Social Networking Websites as an Innovative Framework for Connectivism

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 234 - 245, 01.09.2012

Hasan Tinmaz

Öz

With the Internet’s innate structure, new generations have increased their abilities on finding new people whom they have something in common and networking with them. Web 2.0 technologies have altered the ways how new generations manage their learning activities. Many studies showed that most of the social networking websites have created different learning networks and online communities on their bodies. As a result, many educational institutions have taken advantages of social networking websites for maintaining their teaching and learning activities. On the other hand, institutions suffer from the deficiency of guiding learning theories and their effective implementation. This article discusses Connectivism as an alternative platform for instructional processes on social networking websites. Connectivism explains learning in terms of interactions on a network where the learners exchange their knowledge. Social networking websites which offer connections in the form of friendships provide a context for the implementation of Connectivism. Therefore, the article aims to depict a relationship between educational activities on social networking websites and the contemporary Connectivist Learning Theory. The article also presents suggestions on integration of social networking websites’ into education

Anahtar Kelimeler

Connectivism, Social Networking Websites, Facebook, Web 2.0

Kaynakça

• Baggaley, J. (2012).Thesis and antithesis. Distance Education, 33(1), 117–123.
• Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in
• technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and
• Distance Learning, 12(3), 98-118.
• Boitshwarelo, B. (2011). Proposing an integrated research framework for connectivism: Utilising theoretical synergies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 161-179.
• Boyd, D. M. & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Retrieved on 11 May 2008 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
• Cook, V. (2012).Learning everywhere, all the time. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, Spring, 48-51.
• Dede, C. (2008, May/June). A seismic shift in epistemology. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(3), 80–81.
• Donath, J. (2008). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 231-251.
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
• Fonseca, D. E. L. (2011). EduCamp Colombia: Social networked learning for teacher training. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 60-79.
• Global faces and networked places (2011, March). A Nielsen report on social networking’s new global footprint. Retrieved on 15 October 2011 from http://blog.nielsen.com/ nielsenwire/ wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ nielsen_globalfaces_mar11.pdf
• Guder, C. (2010). Patrons and pedagogy: A look at the theory of connectivism. Public Services Quarterly, 6, 36–42.
• Kerr, B. (2007, February). A challenge to connectivism. Transcript of Keynote Speech, Online Connectivism Conference. University of Manitoba. Retrieved from http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/wiki/index.php?title=Kerr_Presentation
• Kop, R. & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past?. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3), 1-13.
• Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project (2008, November). MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning. Retrieved on 21 May 2009, from http://www.macfound.org/
• Mattar, J. A. (2010). Constructivism and Connectivism in Education Technology: Active, Situated, Authentic, Experiential, and Anchored Learning. Retrieved on 21 July 2011 from http://www.joaomattar.com/ Constructivism%20and%20Connectivism%20 in%20Education%20Technology.pdf
• McBride, M. F. (2012). Reconsidering information literacy in the 21st century: The redesign of an information literacy class. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(3), 287-300.
• McWilliam, E. & Haukka, S. (2008). Educating the creative workforce: New directions for twenty-first century schooling. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 651– 666.
• Muñoz, C.L. & Towner, T. L. (2009). Opening Facebook: How to use Facebook in the college classroom. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Conference in Charleston, South Carolina: USA. Retrieved on 10 April 2010, from http://www46.homepage.villanova.edu/john.immerwahr/TP101/ Facebook.pdf
• Palloff, R. M. & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). San Francisco: John Willey & Sons.
• Ravenscroft, A. (2011). Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 139-160.
• Rousseau, J. J. (2007). Historical case study of the Supernet consortium: Investigating change management and the concepts of Connectivism and distributed professional learning communities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 234. (UMI No. 3273647)
• Siemens, G. (2004a). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved on 14 June 2010 from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
• Siemens, G. (2004b). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved on 14 September 2008 from http://www.connectivism.ca
• Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning and knowledge today. Paper presented at Global Summit 2006: Technology Connected Features, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved on 14 May 2011 from http://www.educationau.edu.au/sites/default/files/gs2006_ siemens.pdf
• Siemens, G. & Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook for emerging technologies for learning. Retrieved on 25 July 2011 from http://umanitoba.ca/ learning_technologies/ cetl/HETL.pdf
• Sims, R. (2008). Rethinking (e)learning: a manifesto for connected generations. Distance Education, 29(2), 153–164.
• Starkey, L. (2010). Teachers’ pedagogical reasoning and action in the digital age. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(2), 233–244.
• Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis‘placement’ of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 502-51.
• Tracey, R. (2009). Instructivism, constructivism or connectivism?. Training & Development in Australia, 36(6), 8-9.
• Tu, C.-H., Sujo-Montes, L. E., Yen, C.-J., Chan, J.-Y. & Blocher, J. M. (2012). The integration of personal learning environments & open network learning environments. TechTrends, 56(3), 13-19.
• Wan, M. H. W. H., Mohd, N. A. R., Zinatul, A. Z., Wan, K. M. & Noor, I. Y. (2012). A method for finding investor through internet marketing strategy. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1841-1849.
• Williams, M. (2008, February). Connectivism from design. Retrieved on 11 November 2009 from http://design.test.olt.ubc.ca/Connectivism
• Williams, R., Karousou, R. & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 39-59.
• Correspondence: Hasan Tinmaz, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Istanbul
• Kultur University, Atakoy Campus, Bakırkoy, Istanbul, Turkey