EN
Early Clinical Outcomes of Congenital Encephalocele and Mortality Risk Factors: A Tertiary Center Experience
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the early clinical outcomes of infants with congenital encephalocele
Methods: We investigated newborns diagnosed with congenital encephalocele and treated in our hospital. We recorded data of the patients regarding the delivery history, anthropometric features, and clinical outcomes. We used conventional statistical methods and Bayesian models.
Results: We included 18 patients (%61.1 female, 38.9% male) in the study. The median birth week was 38 (36.3-39) weeks, and the mean birth weight was 2837+/-816 grams. 83.3% of the patients had undergone an operation with a median of 5 days. The defect diameter was more than 5 cm in 61.1% of the patients, and brain parenchyma was positive in the sac in half of the patients. 22.2% of the patients needed ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. The overall survival resulted in 61.1% in all patients and 73.3% in operated. There were statistically significant differences in terms of birth weight (p<0.001, 3150 v.s 2470 grams) and birth week (38.6 v.s 34.6 weeks, p=0.021), as deceased patients had lower birth weight and birth week.
In Bayesian Kendall’s tau calculations, Neural tissue involvement, defect diameter more than 5 cm, birth weight (very strong evidence), operation within three days of life and birth week (strong evidence), and shunt need and seizures (moderate evidence) had an impact on mortality. There was no significant risk factor for hydrocephalus development, but there was a correlation between hydrocephalus and shunt need. Also, Dandy walker deformity correlated with shunt need (moderate evidence), but the birth week and neural tissue involvement were independent of shunt need (moderate evidence).
Conclusion: The poor prognostic factors for mortality were defect diameter larger than 5 cm, neural tissue involvement in the sac, lower birth week, lower birth weight, and seizures, and the good prognostic factor was operation before postnatal three days of life.
Keywords
References
- Sadler TW. Langman's Medical Embryology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 1990. p.352.
- Naidich TP, Altman NR, Braffman BH, McLone DG, Zimmerman RA. Cephaloceles and related malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992;13(2):655-690.
- Lo BW, Kulkarni AV, Rutka JT, et al. Clinical predictors of developmental outcome in patients with cephaloceles. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;2(4):254-257. doi:10.3171/PED.2008.2.10.254
- Mai CT, Isenburg JL, Canfield MA, et al. National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014. Birth Defects Res. 2019;111(18):1420-1435. doi:10.1002/bdr2.1589
- Siffel C, Wong LY, Olney RS, Correa A. Survival of infants diagnosed with encephalocele in Atlanta, 1979-98. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003;17(1):40-48. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00471.x
- Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, et al. Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(12):1008-1016. doi:10.1002/bdra.20735
- Czeizel AE, Dudás I. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(26):1832-1835. doi:10.1056/NEJM199212243272602
- Tirumandas M, Sharma A, Gbenimacho I, et al. Nasal encephaloceles: a review of etiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentations, diagnosis, treatment, and complications. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29(5):739-744. doi:10.1007/s00381-012-1998-z
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Intensive Care
Journal Section
Clinical Research
Publication Date
June 14, 2024
Submission Date
March 25, 2024
Acceptance Date
May 15, 2024
Published in Issue
Year 2024 Volume: 1 Number: 2
APA
Yaman, A., & Kandemir, İ. (2024). Early Clinical Outcomes of Congenital Encephalocele and Mortality Risk Factors: A Tertiary Center Experience. Cerasus Journal of Medicine, 1(2), 124-130. https://izlik.org/JA83AD75YA
AMA
1.Yaman A, Kandemir İ. Early Clinical Outcomes of Congenital Encephalocele and Mortality Risk Factors: A Tertiary Center Experience. Cerasus J Med. 2024;1(2):124-130. https://izlik.org/JA83AD75YA
Chicago
Yaman, Akan, and İbrahim Kandemir. 2024. “Early Clinical Outcomes of Congenital Encephalocele and Mortality Risk Factors: A Tertiary Center Experience”. Cerasus Journal of Medicine 1 (2): 124-30. https://izlik.org/JA83AD75YA.
EndNote
Yaman A, Kandemir İ (June 1, 2024) Early Clinical Outcomes of Congenital Encephalocele and Mortality Risk Factors: A Tertiary Center Experience. Cerasus Journal of Medicine 1 2 124–130.
IEEE
[1]A. Yaman and İ. Kandemir, “Early Clinical Outcomes of Congenital Encephalocele and Mortality Risk Factors: A Tertiary Center Experience”, Cerasus J Med, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 124–130, June 2024, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA83AD75YA
ISNAD
Yaman, Akan - Kandemir, İbrahim. “Early Clinical Outcomes of Congenital Encephalocele and Mortality Risk Factors: A Tertiary Center Experience”. Cerasus Journal of Medicine 1/2 (June 1, 2024): 124-130. https://izlik.org/JA83AD75YA.
JAMA
1.Yaman A, Kandemir İ. Early Clinical Outcomes of Congenital Encephalocele and Mortality Risk Factors: A Tertiary Center Experience. Cerasus J Med. 2024;1:124–130.
MLA
Yaman, Akan, and İbrahim Kandemir. “Early Clinical Outcomes of Congenital Encephalocele and Mortality Risk Factors: A Tertiary Center Experience”. Cerasus Journal of Medicine, vol. 1, no. 2, June 2024, pp. 124-30, https://izlik.org/JA83AD75YA.
Vancouver
1.Akan Yaman, İbrahim Kandemir. Early Clinical Outcomes of Congenital Encephalocele and Mortality Risk Factors: A Tertiary Center Experience. Cerasus J Med [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 1;1(2):124-30. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA83AD75YA