Haematological, Biochemical, and Serological Differences Between Haemodialysis Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study
Retraction Note
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare haematological, biochemical, and serological parameters in haemodialysis (HD) patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) in order to identify distinctive laboratory patterns with potential clinical relevance. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 77 patients undergoing HD at a tertiary centre: 45 with AKI and 32 with CKD. Demographic characteristics and a broad panel of laboratory parameters encompassing haematological indices, inflammatory markers, liver and cholestatic enzymes, electrolyte and mineral metabolism, iron parameters, and serological markers were analysed. Group comparisons were performed using appropriate statistical tests. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted for Helicobacter pylori (HP) IgA and IgG. Results: Patients with AKI were significantly older than those with CKD (p=0.001), while sex distribution was similar. Compared with CKD patients, the AKI group demonstrated a laboratory profile characterised by higher inflammatory and tissue injury markers, including white blood cell count, neutrophils, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-dimer (all p<0.05). In contrast, CKD patients exhibited higher levels of creatinine, parathyroid hormone, ferritin, iron indices, and alkaline phosphatase, consistent with chronic kidney disease–related metabolic alterations (all p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in HP IgA or IgG levels, and ROC analyses showed no discriminative value for distinguishing AKI from CKD. Conclusion: HD patients with AKI and CKD exhibit distinct multisystem laboratory patterns reflecting acute inflammatory activity versus chronic metabolic adaptation. Recognising these differences may improve contextual interpretation of laboratory findings and support more individualised clinical decision-making in the HD setting.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Ferenbach DA, Bonventre JV. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease: from the laboratory to the clinic. Nephrol Ther. 2016;12(Suppl 1):S41–8. doi:10.1016/j.nephro.2016.02.005.
- 2. Chawla LS, Kimmel PL. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease: an integrated clinical syndrome. Kidney Int. 2012;82(5):516–24. doi:10.1038/ki.2012.208.
- 3. Yeh TH, Tu KC, Wang HY, Chen JY. From acute to chronic: unraveling the pathophysiological mechanisms of the progression from acute kidney injury to acute kidney disease to chronic kidney disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(3):1755. doi:10.3390/ijms25031755.
- 4. Strauß C, Booke H, Forni L, Zarbock A. Biomarkers of acute kidney injury: from discovery to the future of clinical practice. J Clin Anesth. 2024;95:111458. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111458.
- 5. Koh ES, Chung S. Recent update on acute kidney injury-to-chronic kidney disease transition. Yonsei Med J. 2024;65(5):247-56. doi:10.3349/ymj.2023.0306.
- 6. Ozmen S, Akin D, Ozmen CA. A review to differentiate acute kidney injury from chronic kidney disease. J Adv Med Med Res. 2016;18(9):1–7. doi:10.9734/BJMMR/2016/29879.
- 7. Lu Z, Ni W, Wu Y, Zhai B, Zhao Q, Zheng T, et al. Application of biomarkers in the diagnosis of kidney disease. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025;12:1560222. doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1560222.
- 8. Coca SG. Acute kidney injury in elderly persons. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(1):122–31. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.12.034.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Internal Diseases
Journal Section
Retraction
Authors
Mehmet Yıldız
*
0000-0003-0706-0906
Türkiye
Ali Muhtaroğlu
0000-0001-5412-2175
Türkiye
Berkan Acar
0000-0001-9798-295X
Türkiye
Ahmet Dülger
0000-0002-9328-5185
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
February 5, 2026
Publication Date
February 5, 2026
Submission Date
December 11, 2025
Acceptance Date
January 23, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 3 Number: 2