Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets

Ahmet Yıldırım

doi:10.65022/clindentres.1782679

Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets

Abstract

Background and Aim: This study aims to evaluate the compatibility between the manufacturer-declared and the actual measured slot dimensions of different commercially available orthodontic brackets. Materials and Methods: In this study, the vertical slot dimensions of orthodontic brackets produced from different materials and manufacturing techniques were comparatively analyzed. Measurements were obtained from microscopic images of 15 metal and 15 ceramic brackets, and slot height was measured both near the base and at the open edge of the brackets. The data were subsequently evaluated through intragroup analyses as well as by comparison with the manufacturerstated dimensions. Results: In the study, the upper edges of the slots in both bracket groups were found to be significantly wider than the base, indicating a statistically significant difference. These findings suggest that the slots exhibit a slightly divergent configuration. Moreover, the mean slot heights of both metal and ceramic brackets were found to be significantly greater than the manufacturer-specified value of 0.022 inches (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The findings of the study indicate that orthodontic bracket slots may be wider than the dimensions stated by the manufacturers, which may lead to unintended deviations in the three-dimensional positioning of teeth. This highlights the need for clinicians to exercise caution. In this context, considering that increased slot dimensions can compromise tooth movement control, it is recommended to use archwires that better fill the slot or to implement compensatory measures such as wire bending.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval was not required for this study as it did not involve the use of any human or animal materials.

References

1. Brown P, Wagner W, Choi H. Orthodontic bracket slot dimensions as measured from entire bracket series. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 678-682.
2. O’Higgins E, Kirschen R, Lee R. The influence of maxillary incisor inclination on arch length. Br J Orthod 1999; 26: 97-102.
3. Joch A, Pichelmayer M, Weiland F. Bracket slot and archwire dimensions: manufacturing precision and third order clearance. J Orthod 2010; 37: 241-249.
4. Meling TR, Ødegaard J. The effect of cross-sectional dimensional variations of square and rectangular chrome-cobalt archwires on torsion. Angle Orthod 1998; 68: 239-248.
5. Siatkowski RE. Loss of anterior torque control due to variations in bracket slot and archwire dimensions. J Clin Orthod 1999; 33: 508-510.
6. Fischer-Brandies H, Orthuber W, Es-Souni M, Meyer S. Torque transmission between square wire and bracket as a function of measurement, form and hardness parameters. J Orofac Orthop 2000; 61: 258-265.
7. Gioka C, Eliades T. Materials-induced variation in the torque expression of preadjusted appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 323-328.
8. Miethke RR, Melsen B. Effect of variation in tooth morphology and bracket position on first and third order correction with preadjusted appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 329-335.

9. Meling TR, Ødegaard J, Meling EØ. On mechanical properties of square and rectangular stainless steel wires tested in torsion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111: 310-320.
10. Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP. Fundamentals of orthodontic treatment mechanics. Le Grande Publishing: London and Dubai; 2014.
11. Tang, Z., Dai, J., Yu, A., Li, P., Liu, C., & Shen, X. 3D-printed zirconia orthodontic brackets: Effect of printing method on dimensional accuracy. Orthod Craniofac Res 2024; 27, 147-154.
12. Park JS, Song IT, Bae JH, Gil SM, Kang KH. Comparison of slot sizes and parallelism of metal brackets manufactured through metal injection molding and computerized numerical control. Korean J Orthod 2020; 50: 401-406.
13. Cash A, Good S, Curtis R, McDonald F. An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets—are standards as expected? Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 450-453.
14. Brucculeri, L., Carpanese, C., Palone, M., & Lombardo, L. Inhouse 3D-printed vs. conventional bracket: an in vitro comparative analysis of real and nominal bracket slot heights. Appl Sci 2022; 12, 10120.
15. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Assessment of second-order clearances between orthodontic archwires and bracket slots via the critical contact angle for binding. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 71-80.
16. Bhalla NB, Good SA, McDonald F, Sherriff M, Cash AC. Assessment of slot sizes in self-ligating brackets using electron microscopy. Aust Orthod J 2010; 26: 38-41.
17. Bauer, C. A., Scheurer, M., Bourauel, C., Kretzer, J. P., Roser, C. J., Lux, C. J., & Hodecker, L. D. Precision of slot widths and torque transmission of in-office 3D printed brackets : An in vitro study. J Orofac Orthop 2024; 85, 327-339.
18. Wichelhaus A, Guggenbühl S, Hötzel L, Seidel CL, Sabbagh H, Hoffmann L. Comparing torque transmission of different bracket systems in combination with various archwires considering play in the bracket slot: an in vitro study. Materials 2024; 17: 684.
19. Harikrishnan P, Magesh V, Ajayan AM, JebaSingh DK. Finite element analysis of torque induced orthodontic bracket slot deformation in various bracket-archwire contact assembly. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2020; 197: 105748.
20. Alexander RG. The 20 principles of the Alexander discipline. 2008.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ahmet Yıldırım ^*
0009-0005-6804-1276
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 29, 2026

Submission Date

September 12, 2025

Acceptance Date

October 28, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 50 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.65022/clindentres.1782679

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA29PE97MW

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Yıldırım, A. (2026). Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets. Clinical Dentistry and Research, 50(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.65022/clindentres.1782679

AMA

1.Yıldırım A. Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets. Clin Dent Res. 2026;50(1):23-29. doi:10.65022/clindentres.1782679

Chicago

Yıldırım, Ahmet. 2026. “Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets”. Clinical Dentistry and Research 50 (1): 23-29. https://doi.org/10.65022/clindentres.1782679.

EndNote

Yıldırım A (April 1, 2026) Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets. Clinical Dentistry and Research 50 1 23–29.

IEEE

[1]A. Yıldırım, “Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets”, Clin Dent Res, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 23–29, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.65022/clindentres.1782679.

ISNAD

Yıldırım, Ahmet. “Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets”. Clinical Dentistry and Research 50/1 (April 1, 2026): 23-29. https://doi.org/10.65022/clindentres.1782679.

JAMA

1.Yıldırım A. Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets. Clin Dent Res. 2026;50:23–29.

MLA

Yıldırım, Ahmet. “Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets”. Clinical Dentistry and Research, vol. 50, no. 1, Apr. 2026, pp. 23-29, doi:10.65022/clindentres.1782679.

Vancouver

1.Ahmet Yıldırım. Assessment of Slot Dimension Variability in Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets. Clin Dent Res. 2026 Apr. 1;50(1):23-9. doi:10.65022/clindentres.1782679