Background and Aims: Dry socket is the most common
complication of dental extractions and consequence in a
remarkable reduction in quality of life. The primary objective of
this investigation is to compare the effectiveness of Platelet
Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Xeroform as remedies for dry socket.
Materials and Methods: This retrospective study utilized the
follow-up records of patients with a history of dry socket. The
first group underwent PRF treatment (n=15), while the second
group received Xeroform gauze packing for the management
of dry socket (n=16). Pain, gingival index (GI), rate of exposed
bone walls, halitosis, and dysgeusia status were assessed
preoperatively and 1 day, 3, 7, and 14 days postoperatively.
Results: Evaluations indicated that PRF outperformed
Xeroform in minimizing pain and GI scores on the 1st (P=
0.021 and 0.001, respectively) and 3rd (P=0.001 and 0.003,
respectively) postoperative days. PRF achieved statistically
greater exposed bone wall coverage than Xeroform on days
1, 3, and 7 postoperatively (P=0.000, 0.000, and 0.005,
respectively). PRF led to a significant reduction in halitosis
prevalence on the 14th day postoperatively, as compared to
the preoperative measurements (P=0.004), and on the 3rd day
postoperatively, as compared to Xeroform (P=0.029).
Conclusions: PRF may be a more suitable option for the
treatment of dry socket than Xeroform gauze packing
in patients with severe pain, excess perisocket gingival
inflammation, and halitosis.
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 28, 2024 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA35CA29WF |
| Published in Issue | Year 2024 Volume: 48 Issue: 2 |