BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Finite element analysis of stress distribution on canal walls while preparation of curved canals

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 14 - 18, 29.01.2014

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine stress evaluation of root canal wall during shaping curved canals with ProTaper and HeroShaper systems by using three-dimensional finite element universal. 

Methods: The geometries of the ProTaper Universal and HeroShaper Ni-Ti rotary systems’ selected files were created using three-dimensional finite element modelsThe three-dimensional FEA model within a curved canal was established by integrating a simulated canal and natural tooth. A micro-focus CT scanner was used to scan the models. After integration and modification a final three-dimensional model with a smooth surface and mostly centered canal was established. The stresses on the instrument during simulated shaping of a root canal were analyzed numerically by using a three-dimensional finite element package, LS-DYNA, taking into account the nonlinear mechanical behavior of the nickel-titanium material. Stress distribution in the instruments and the canal walls was recorded during simulated shaping. 

Results: With ProTaper file system, stress concentrations were determined towards the outer aspect of the curvature in the apical portion of the canal but in HeroShaper system stress was more concentrated in the middle portion of the canal and were less than ProTaper model. 

Conclusion: HeroShaper files cut more efficiently and generated less stress on the canal walls than ProTaper files because of their possitive rake angle. It was observed that there was stress concentration towards the outer aspect of the curvature in the apical portion of the canal with the ProTaper file system. This shows us that these files are more feasible for apical transportation.


Key words: Curved canals, HeroShaper, ProTaper, finite element analysis, stress

Kaynakça

  • Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. Dent Clin North Am.1974; 18(2): 269-96.
  • Schafer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2004; 37: 239-248.
  • Wein FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation prosedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod. 1975; 1: 255-2
  • Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Profile .04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. Int Endod J. 1997; 30: 1- 7.
  • Zmener O, Banegas G. Comparision of three instrumentation techniques in the preperation of simulated curved root canals. Int Endod J. 1996; 29: 315- 319.
  • Schirrmeister JF, Strohl C, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT, Hellwig E. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel- titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 101: 807-813.
  • Bryant ST, Dummer PMH, Pitoni C, Bourbo M, Moghal S. Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canal. Int Endod J. 1999; 32: 155-164.
  • Peters OA, Peters CI. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 10 th ed, 2006 St Louis, Missouri, Mosby Elsevier. 2011; 299-302.
  • Calas P. Hero Shapers: The adapted pitch concept. Endodontics Topics. 2005; 10: 155-163.
  • Schafer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod. 2004; 30: 432-435.
  • Garip Y, Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2001; 34: 452-457.
  • Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titenium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 92: 215-220.
  • Ruddle CJ. The ProTaper technique. Endodontic Topics, 2005; 10: 187-1
  • Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM. Impact of two theoretical crosssections on torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument models. J Endod. 2000; 26: 414-417.
  • Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsiyonal and bending stress in two mathematical models of nickeltitanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus Profile. J Endod. 2003; 29(1): 15-19.
  • Tripi TR, Bonaccorso A, Condorelli GG. Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102: 106-114.
  • Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments. J Endod. 2004; 30(4): 228-230.
  • Schafer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickeltitanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2004; 37: 229-238.
  • Paque F, Musch U, Hülsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 8-16.
  • Veltri M, Mollo A, Mantovani L, Pini P, Balleri P, Grandini S. A comparative study Endoflare-HeroShaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 610-616. Yang GB, Zhou XD, Zhang H, Wu HK. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals. Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 791-799.
  • Yang GB, Zhou XD, Zheng YL, Zhang H, Shu Y, Wu HK. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 707-714.
  • Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, Haznedaroğlu F, Tanalp J, Bayırlı G. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 100: 636-642.
  • Uyanık MO, Cehreli ZC, Mocan BO, Daglı FT. Comparative evaluation of three nickel-titanium instrumentation systems in human teeth using computed tomography. J Endod. 2006; 32: 668-671.
  • Aydin C, Inan U, Yasar S, Bulucu B, Tunca YM. Comprasion of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105: 92Günday M. Eğri kök kanallarının preparasyonunda kanal aletleri üzerinde oluşan kuvvetler. Dişhekimliğinde Klinik. 1996; 3: 145-148.

Eğri kök kanallarında şekillendirme sırasında oluşan streslerin sonlu elemanlar yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 14 - 18, 29.01.2014

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı eğri kök kanallarında ProTaper Universal ve HeroShaper sistemleri ile şekillendirme yapılırken kanal duvarlarında oluşan streslerin üç boyutlu sonlu elemanlar analizi ile belirlenmesidir. 

Yöntem: ProTaper Universal ve HeroShaper Ni-Ti döner alet sistemlerine ait eğelerin geometrileri üç boyutlu sonlu elemanlar yöntemi ile oluşturulmuştur. Eğri kök kanalına sahip dişin üç boyutlu sonlu elemanlar modeli, doğal diş ve yapay kanalın birleştirilmesi ile oluşturulmuştur. Modellerin taranması için mikro-fokus CT kullanılmıştır. Birleştirme ve modifikasyondan sonra düzgün yüzeyli ve kanalı merkezde seyreden üç boyutlu model elde edilmiştir. Şekillendirme benzetimi sırasında kanal duvarlarında oluşan stresler LS-DYNA sonlu elemanlar programı ile ve nikel titanyum materyalinin non-lineer mekanik özellikleri dikkate alınarak kayıt edilmiştir. 

Bulgular: ProTaper eğe sistemi ile şekillendirmede kanalın apikal kısmında eğimin dışına doğru stres yoğunluğu oluştuğu ancak HeroShaper ile yapılan şekillendirme benzetiminde orta kısımda ve ProTaper modelinden daha az stres oluştuğu belirlenmiştir. 

Sonuçlar: HeroShaper eğe modelleri kanal duvarlarında ProTaper eğe modellerine göre daha az stres oluşturmuştur. HeroShaper eğe modellerinin kesme etkinliğinin yüksek olması sebebiyle dentin direnci azalmaktadır. ProTaper eğe modelleri ile şekillendirme benzetimi yapılan kanalarda stres oluşumunun, özellikle apikal alanda eğriliğin dışına doğru artmış olduğu görülmüştür. Bu da ProTaper eğelerinin apikal transportasyona daha yatkın olduğunu göstermektedir.


Anahtar Kelimeler : Eğri kök kanalları, HeroShaper, ProTaper, sonlu elemanlar analizi, stres

Kaynakça

  • Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. Dent Clin North Am.1974; 18(2): 269-96.
  • Schafer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2004; 37: 239-248.
  • Wein FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation prosedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod. 1975; 1: 255-2
  • Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Profile .04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. Int Endod J. 1997; 30: 1- 7.
  • Zmener O, Banegas G. Comparision of three instrumentation techniques in the preperation of simulated curved root canals. Int Endod J. 1996; 29: 315- 319.
  • Schirrmeister JF, Strohl C, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT, Hellwig E. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel- titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 101: 807-813.
  • Bryant ST, Dummer PMH, Pitoni C, Bourbo M, Moghal S. Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canal. Int Endod J. 1999; 32: 155-164.
  • Peters OA, Peters CI. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 10 th ed, 2006 St Louis, Missouri, Mosby Elsevier. 2011; 299-302.
  • Calas P. Hero Shapers: The adapted pitch concept. Endodontics Topics. 2005; 10: 155-163.
  • Schafer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod. 2004; 30: 432-435.
  • Garip Y, Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2001; 34: 452-457.
  • Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titenium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 92: 215-220.
  • Ruddle CJ. The ProTaper technique. Endodontic Topics, 2005; 10: 187-1
  • Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM. Impact of two theoretical crosssections on torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument models. J Endod. 2000; 26: 414-417.
  • Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsiyonal and bending stress in two mathematical models of nickeltitanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus Profile. J Endod. 2003; 29(1): 15-19.
  • Tripi TR, Bonaccorso A, Condorelli GG. Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102: 106-114.
  • Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments. J Endod. 2004; 30(4): 228-230.
  • Schafer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickeltitanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2004; 37: 229-238.
  • Paque F, Musch U, Hülsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 8-16.
  • Veltri M, Mollo A, Mantovani L, Pini P, Balleri P, Grandini S. A comparative study Endoflare-HeroShaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 610-616. Yang GB, Zhou XD, Zhang H, Wu HK. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals. Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 791-799.
  • Yang GB, Zhou XD, Zheng YL, Zhang H, Shu Y, Wu HK. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 707-714.
  • Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, Haznedaroğlu F, Tanalp J, Bayırlı G. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 100: 636-642.
  • Uyanık MO, Cehreli ZC, Mocan BO, Daglı FT. Comparative evaluation of three nickel-titanium instrumentation systems in human teeth using computed tomography. J Endod. 2006; 32: 668-671.
  • Aydin C, Inan U, Yasar S, Bulucu B, Tunca YM. Comprasion of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105: 92Günday M. Eğri kök kanallarının preparasyonunda kanal aletleri üzerinde oluşan kuvvetler. Dişhekimliğinde Klinik. 1996; 3: 145-148.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Dilek Erbay Türkaydın

Mahir Günday Bu kişi benim

Bülent Ekici Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Ocak 2014
Gönderilme Tarihi 29 Ocak 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Erbay Türkaydın, D., Günday, M., & Ekici, B. (2014). Eğri kök kanallarında şekillendirme sırasında oluşan streslerin sonlu elemanlar yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 3(1), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.5455/musbed.20130124112218
AMA Erbay Türkaydın D, Günday M, Ekici B. Eğri kök kanallarında şekillendirme sırasında oluşan streslerin sonlu elemanlar yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. Şubat 2014;3(1):14-18. doi:10.5455/musbed.20130124112218
Chicago Erbay Türkaydın, Dilek, Mahir Günday, ve Bülent Ekici. “Eğri kök kanallarında şekillendirme sırasında oluşan Streslerin Sonlu Elemanlar yöntemi Ile değerlendirilmesi”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 3, sy. 1 (Şubat 2014): 14-18. https://doi.org/10.5455/musbed.20130124112218.
EndNote Erbay Türkaydın D, Günday M, Ekici B (01 Şubat 2014) Eğri kök kanallarında şekillendirme sırasında oluşan streslerin sonlu elemanlar yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 3 1 14–18.
IEEE D. Erbay Türkaydın, M. Günday, ve B. Ekici, “Eğri kök kanallarında şekillendirme sırasında oluşan streslerin sonlu elemanlar yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi”, Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, c. 3, sy. 1, ss. 14–18, 2014, doi: 10.5455/musbed.20130124112218.
ISNAD Erbay Türkaydın, Dilek vd. “Eğri kök kanallarında şekillendirme sırasında oluşan Streslerin Sonlu Elemanlar yöntemi Ile değerlendirilmesi”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 3/1 (Şubat 2014), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.5455/musbed.20130124112218.
JAMA Erbay Türkaydın D, Günday M, Ekici B. Eğri kök kanallarında şekillendirme sırasında oluşan streslerin sonlu elemanlar yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2014;3:14–18.
MLA Erbay Türkaydın, Dilek vd. “Eğri kök kanallarında şekillendirme sırasında oluşan Streslerin Sonlu Elemanlar yöntemi Ile değerlendirilmesi”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, c. 3, sy. 1, 2014, ss. 14-18, doi:10.5455/musbed.20130124112218.
Vancouver Erbay Türkaydın D, Günday M, Ekici B. Eğri kök kanallarında şekillendirme sırasında oluşan streslerin sonlu elemanlar yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2014;3(1):14-8.

14639   14640