Colorimetric Assessment of Surface Sealants for Discoloration of a Nanofilled Resin Composite

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 4, 448 - 453, 30.12.2020

Bora Korkut

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.808644

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study was aimed to assess the effect of different surface sealants on discoloration of a nonofilled resin-based composite quantitatively, using a colorimeter.

Methods: 40 specimens were prepared using nanofilled resin composite, Filtek Universal Restorative (A2 shade, 3M, USA). Sprecimens were polymerized from both sides, polished using polishing discs (SofLex, 3M, USA) and divided by test groups (n = 10 for each), regarding the sealant used; Permaseal (Ultradent Products, USA), Biscover LV (Bisco, USA), Optiglaze Clear (GC Corp., Japan) and control group. Samples were discolored for 144 hours in coffee solution, and color measurements were performed using colorimeter (ShadeStar, Dentsply Sirona, USA). Nominal color codes of specimens regarding Vita Classical Shade Guide, were converted to corresponding numerical values. Level of color change after sealant application (∆Vita1) and after discoloration (∆Vita2) were calculated. Shapiro Wilk and Kruskal Wallis tests were used for

statistical analyses.

Results: Color changes in Permaseal, Optiglaze and control groups were significant (p < 0.001) compared to Biscover, for ∆Vita1 scores. Remarkable level of darkening was observed for all groups, for ∆Vita2 scores. Permaseal revealed significantly the highest level of darkening, among all (p < 0.001), but no difference with control group. Optiglaze showed significantly lower level of darkening compared to the control group (p < 0.001), whereas no difference with Biscover (p ≥ 0.05). Biscover group showed similar level of darkening with Optiglaze and control groups (p ≥ 0.05).

Conclusion: Permaseal sealant presented significantly the highest discoloration, whereas Biscover and Optiglaze sealants presented similar and lower. Colorimeter might be determined as repeatable method for measuring discoloration in vitro.

Keywords

Sealant, Biscover, Optiglaze, Permaseal, discoloration, nanocomposite

Project Number

Yok

References

• 1. Khalaj K, Soudi A, Tayefi-Nasrabadi M, Keshvad, M. The evaluation of surface sealants’ effect on the color stability of Nano-hybrid composite after polishing with One-Step system (in-vitro). J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10(9):927-932.
• 2. Beltrami R, Ceci M, De Pani G, Vialba L, Frederico R, Poggio C, Colombo M. Effect of different surface finishing/polishing procedures on color stability of esthetic restorative materials: a spectrophotometric evaluation. Eur J Dent 2018; 12(1):49-56.
• 3. Poggio C, Ceci M, Beltrami R, Mirando M, Wassim J, Colombo M. Color stability of esthetic restorative materials: a spectrophotometric analysis. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2016; 2(1):95-101.
• 4. Halacoglu D, Yamanel K, Basaran S, Tuncer D, Celik C. Effects of staining and bleaching on a nano-hybrid composite with or without surface sealant. Eur J Dent 2016; 10(3):361-365.
• 5. Nikolaidis A, Vouzara T, Koulaouzidou E. Pit and fissure nanocomposite sealants reinforced with organically modified montmorillonite: A study of their mechanical properties, surface roughness and color stability. Dent Mater 2020; 1:1-11.
• 6. Ruschel VC, Bon VS, Baratieri LN, Maia HP. Effect of Surface Sealants and Polishing Time on Composite Surface Roughness and Microhardness. Oper Dent 2018; 43(4):408-415.
• 7. Hepdeniz OK, Temel UB, Ugurlu M, Koskan O. The effect of surface sealants with different filler content on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Eur J Dent 2016; 10(2):163-169.
• 8. Tekçe N, Pala K, Tuncer S, Demirci M. The effect of surface sealant application and accelerated aging on posterior restorative surfaces: An SEM and AFM study. Dent Mater 2017; 36(2):182-189.
• 9. Spina DR., Grossi JR, Cunali RS, Filho FB, da Cunha LF, Gonzaga CC, Correr CM. Evaluation of Discoloration Removal by Polishing Resin Composites Submitted to Staining in Different Drink Solutions. Int Sch Res Notices 2015; 2015:1-5.
• 10. Pustina-Krasniqi T, Shala K, Staka G, Bicaj T, Ahmedi E, Dula L. Lightness, chroma, and hue distributions in natural teeth measured by a spectrophotometer. Eur J Dent 2017; 11(1):36-40.
• 11. He WH, Park CJ, Byun S, Tan D, Lin CY, Chee W. Evaluating the relationship between tooth color and enamel thickness, using twin flash photography, cross‐polarization photography, and spectrophotometer. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 1:1-11.
• 12. Lee YK. Comparison of CIELAB ΔE* and CIEDE2000 color-differences after polymerization and thermocycling of resin composites. Dent Mater 2005; 21(7):678-682.
• 13. Doray PG, Eldiwany MS, Powers JM. Effect of resin surface sealents on improvement of stain resistance for a composite provisional material. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15:244-249.
• 14. Rajkumar K, Kumar S, Mahalaxmi S, Ragavi P, Mageshwaran TA. Colour stability of resin composites after emersing in coffee of different temperature - an in vitro study. SRM Univ J Dent Sci 2011; 2(2):91-95.
• 15. Hepdeniz OK, Temel UB, Ugurlu M, Koskan O. The effect of surface sealants with different filler content on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Eur J Dent 2016; 10(2):163-169.
• 16. Tuncer S, Demirci M, Tiryaki M, Ünlü N, Uysal Ö. The effect of a modeling resin and thermocycling on the surface hardness, roughness, and color of different resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013; 25(6):404-419.
• 17. Barutcigil Ç, Yildiz M. Intrinsic and extrinsic discoloration of dimethacrylate and silorane based composites. J Dent 2012; 40(1):57-63.
• 18. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent 2005; 33(5):389-398.
• 19. Khokhar ZA, Razzoog ME. Yaman P. Color stability of restorative resins. Quintessence Int 1991; 22(9):733-777.
• 20. Mundim FM, Garcia LDFR, Pires-de-Souza FDC. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18(3):249-254.
• 21. Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk T, Guler E, Kurt S. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94(2):118-124.
• 22. Reddy PS, Tejaswi KL, Shetty S, Annapoorna BM, Pujari SC, Thippeswamy HM. Effects of commonly consumed beverages on surface roughness and color stability of the nano, micro-hybrid and hybrid composite resins: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14(4):718-723.
• 23. Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, Subbarao CV. Color stability of microfilled, micro-hybrid and nanocomposite resins-an in vitro study. J Dent 2010; 38(2):137-142.
• 24. Ardu S, Duc O, Di Bella E, Krejci I, Daher R. Color stability of different composite resins after polishing. Odontology 2018; 106(3):328-333.
• 25. Kalachandra S, Turner DT. Water sorption of polymethacrylate networks: bis-GMA/TEGDM copolymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21:329-338.
• 26. Şahin O, Dede DÖ, Köroğlu A, Yılmaz B. Influence of surface sealant agents on the surface roughness and color stability of artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114(1):130-137.
• 27. Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17:102-108.
• 28. Corcodel N, Hassel AJ, Sen S, Saure D, Hum S, Rammelsberg P, Lux CJ, Zingler S. Effects of staining and polishing on different types of enamel surface sealants. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30(6):580-586.