Yıl 2021, Cilt 11 , Sayı 1, Sayfalar 1 - 8 2021-03-31

Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation.

Işıl KALYONCU [1] , Figen EREN GİRAY [2] , Basak DURMUS [3] , Yildiz GARİP BERKER [4] , İlknur TANBOĞA [5]


Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of MTAD (a mixture of a tetracycline isomer, an acid, and a detergent), Er:YAG laser, 17% EDTA, and 5.25% NaOCl in removing the smear layer from the surface of instrumented root canals. Materials and Methods: Various organic acids, instruments and lasers have been used to remove the smear layer from the surface of instrumented root canals. Twenty-eight extracted maxillary and mandibular incisors were prepared with rotary files. The teeth were randomly allocated to four treatment groups for final irrigation as follows: (1) 17% EDTA (followed by NaOCl), (2) 5.25% NaOCl, (3) Er:YAG laser, and (4) MTAD. All teeth were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the removal of the smear layer was examined in the apical, middle and coronal thirds. Results: At coronal location, NaOCl(2.2±0.4) group had significantly higher scores than MTAD(0.0±0.0), EDTA(0.6±0.4) and Er:YAG laser(0.6±0.4) groups (p<0.001, p=0.039, and p=0.039, respectively). At the middle third, NaOCl(2.6±0.5) scores were significantly higher than MTAD(0.0±0.0) and EDTA(0.8±0.4) groups (p<0.001 and p=0.036 respectively). At apical MTAD (0.4±0.3) group had significantly better scores (p<0.001). Conclusion: The results of this suggest that MTAD is an effective final irrigator agent, particularly in the apical segment of the root canal, which presents challenges during cleaning.
MTAD, Er:YAG laser, smear layer, scanning electron microscope
  • 1. Gupta PK, Mahajan UP, Gupta K, Sheela NV. Comparative evaluation of a new endodontic irrigant - mixture of a tetracycline isomer, an Acid, and a detergent to remove the intracanal smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Int Oral Health Apr 2015;7(4):1-6.
  • 2. Susila A, Minu J. Activated Irrigation vs. Conventional non-activated Irrigation in Endodontics - A Systematic Review. Eur Endod J 2019;4(3):96-110.
  • 3. Charlie KM, Kuttappa MA, George L, Manoj KV, Joseph B, John NK. A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Jan-Feb 2018;8(1):62-69.
  • 4. Kumar P, Prasad N, Darawade A, Bhagat SK, Narayana N, Darawade P. The Effect of Four Commonly used Root Canal Irrigants on the Removal of Smear Layer: An In-vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study. J Int Oral Health Sep 2015;7(9):88-93.
  • 5. Karunakaran JV, Kumar SS, Kumar M, Chandrasekhar S, Namitha D. The effects of various irrigating solutions on intra-radicular dentinal surface: An SEM analysis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci Aug 2012;4(Suppl 2):S125-130.
  • 6. Dotto L, Sarkis Onofre R, Bacchi A, Rocha Pereira GK. Effect of Root Canal Irrigants on the Mechanical Properties of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Scoping Review. J Endod May 2020;46(5):596-604.e593.
  • 7. Kalyoncuoglu E, Demiryurek EO. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal from teeth with different irrigation solutions and lasers. Microsc Microanal Dec 2013;19(6):1465-1469.
  • 8. Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, et al. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod Mar 2003;29(3):170-175.
  • 9. Zhou H, Li Q, Wei L, Huang S, Zhao S. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with chitosan and MTAD. Niger J Clin Pract Jan 2018;21(1):76-80.
  • 10. Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Yaripour S, et al. Smear Layer Removing Ability of Root Canal Irrigation Solutions: A Review. J Contemp Dent Pract Mar 1 2019;20(3):395-402.
  • 11. Deari S, Mohn D, Zehnder M. Dentine decalcification and smear layer removal by different ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 1-hydroxyethane-1,1-diphosphonic acid species. Int Endod J Feb 2019;52(2):237-243.
  • 12. Zehnder M, Kosicki D, Luder H, Sener B, Waltimo T. Tissue-dissolving capacity and antibacterial effect of buffered and unbuffered hypochlorite solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Dec 2002;94(6):756-762.
  • 13. Andrabi SM, Kumar A, Kumar Tewari R, Kumar Mishra S, Iftekhar H. An In Vitro SEM Study on the Effectiveness of Smear Layer Removal of Four Different Irrigations. Iran Endod J Fall 2012;7(4):171-176.
  • 14. Yadav HK, Yadav RK, Chandra A, Tikku AP. A Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Etidronic Acid, SmearClear and MTAD in Removing the Intracanal Smear Layer. J Dent (Shiraz) Jun 2017;18(2):118-126.
  • 15. Paul ML, Mazumdar D, Niyogi A, Baranwal AK. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different irrigants including MTAD under SEM. J Conserv Dent Jul 2013;16(4):336-341.
  • 16. Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, Lin PS. A scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions: Part 3. J Endod Apr 1983;9(4):137-142.
  • 17. Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Int Endod J May 2005;38(5):285-290.
  • 18. Ashraf H, Asnaashari M, Darmiani S, Birang R. Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study. Iran Endod J Summer 2014;9(3):210-214.
  • 19. Guidotti R, Merigo E, Fornaini C, Rocca JP, Medioni E, Vescovi P. Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: a help in removing smear layer. Lasers Med Sci Jan 2014;29(1):69-75.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Sağlık Bilimleri ve Hizmetleri
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0003-3840-0272
Yazar: Işıl KALYONCU (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: Marmara Üniversitesi Dişhelimliği Fakültesi
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0001-8359-5377
Yazar: Figen EREN GİRAY
Kurum: Marmara Üniversitesi Dişhelimliği Fakültesi
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0002-5870-0021
Yazar: Basak DURMUS
Kurum: Marmara Üniversitesi Dişhelimliği Fakültesi
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0001-8361-9295
Yazar: Yildiz GARİP BERKER
Kurum: İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0003-1383-5819
Yazar: İlknur TANBOĞA
Kurum: Marmara Üniversitesi Dişhelimliği Fakültesi
Ülke: Turkey


Tarihler

Başvuru Tarihi : 14 Eylül 2020
Kabul Tarihi : 14 Aralık 2020
Yayımlanma Tarihi : 31 Mart 2021

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { clinexphealthsci794726, journal = {Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences}, issn = {}, eissn = {2459-1459}, address = {}, publisher = {Marmara Üniversitesi}, year = {2021}, volume = {11}, pages = {1 - 8}, doi = {10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726}, title = {Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation.}, key = {cite}, author = {Kalyoncu, Işıl and Eren Giray, Figen and Durmus, Basak and Garip Berker, Yildiz and Tanboğa, İlknur} }
APA Kalyoncu, I , Eren Giray, F , Durmus, B , Garip Berker, Y , Tanboğa, İ . (2021). Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation. . Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences , 11 (1) , 1-8 . DOI: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
MLA Kalyoncu, I , Eren Giray, F , Durmus, B , Garip Berker, Y , Tanboğa, İ . "Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation." . Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11 (2021 ): 1-8 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/clinexphealthsci/issue/61072/794726>
Chicago Kalyoncu, I , Eren Giray, F , Durmus, B , Garip Berker, Y , Tanboğa, İ . "Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation.". Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11 (2021 ): 1-8
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation. AU - Işıl Kalyoncu , Figen Eren Giray , Basak Durmus , Yildiz Garip Berker , İlknur Tanboğa Y1 - 2021 PY - 2021 N1 - doi: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726 DO - 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726 T2 - Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 1 EP - 8 VL - 11 IS - 1 SN - -2459-1459 M3 - doi: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726 UR - https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726 Y2 - 2020 ER -
EndNote %0 Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation. %A Işıl Kalyoncu , Figen Eren Giray , Basak Durmus , Yildiz Garip Berker , İlknur Tanboğa %T Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation. %D 2021 %J Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences %P -2459-1459 %V 11 %N 1 %R doi: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726 %U 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
ISNAD Kalyoncu, Işıl , Eren Giray, Figen , Durmus, Basak , Garip Berker, Yildiz , Tanboğa, İlknur . "Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation.". Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11 / 1 (Mart 2021): 1-8 . https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726
AMA Kalyoncu I , Eren Giray F , Durmus B , Garip Berker Y , Tanboğa İ . Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation.. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021; 11(1): 1-8.
Vancouver Kalyoncu I , Eren Giray F , Durmus B , Garip Berker Y , Tanboğa İ . Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation.. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021; 11(1): 1-8.
IEEE I. Kalyoncu , F. Eren Giray , B. Durmus , Y. Garip Berker ve İ. Tanboğa , "Efficacy of MTAD solution and Er:YAG laser in smear layer removal from extracted root canals: a sem evaluation.", Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, c. 11, sayı. 1, ss. 1-8, Mar. 2021, doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.794726