Prenatal Psychosocial Profile: Validity and Reliability Study to Its Use in Turkey

Year 2021, Volume: 11 Issue: 4, 856 - 864, 26.10.2021

Sevil Günaydın , Neriman Zengin

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.842126

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Objective: This study was planned to test the statistical properties of the prenatal psychosocial profile assessment tool in Turkish sample and to examine its validity and reliability on healthy pregnant women.
Methods: This reliability and validity study was conducted in the gynecology and obstetrics outpatient clinic of a training and research hospital with 440 healthy pregnant women between March and June 2017.
Results: In the analysis performed for internal consistency in the Prenatal Psychosocial Profile (PPP) reliability study, Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient was found to be μ=.75 for the stress subscale, μ = .94 for the social support-partner subscale, μ = .96 for the social support-other people subscale, and μ= .80 for the self-esteem subscale. In the construct validity of the PPP-stress subscale, loads of all items except one item were found to be sufficient, and in the social support-partner, social support-other people, and self-esteem subscales, loads of all items were found to be sufficient.
Conclusion: The Prenatal Psychosocial Profile-Turkish Version is a valid and reliable assessment tool that can be used to determine the psychosocial profile of women during pregnancy.

Keywords

Prenatal psychosocial profile, stress, social support, self-esteem

Project Number

YOK

References

• [1] Uçar H. Relationship between psychosocial health status of pregnant women and role of motherhood. T. C. Atatürk University Institute of Health Sciences, Master Thesis, Erzurum; 2014.
• [2] Weissheimer AM, Mamede MV. Prenatal psychosocial profile: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation to its use in Brazil. Midwifery. 2015; 31 (12): 1157-1162.
• [3] Demirbaş H, Kadıoğlu H. Adaptation to pregnancy in prenatal period women and factors associated with adaptation. Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences. 2014; 4(4): 200-206.
• [4] Daş Z, Psychosocial and Cultural Aspects of Pregnancy. In: Taşkın, L. (Ed.), Maternity and Women 's Health Nursing. Ankara: 2012. pp. 211-223.
• [5] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion No. 343: psychosocial risk factors: perinatal screening and intervention. Obstet Gynecol 2006 ;108(2): 8.
• [6] Curry MA, Burton D, Fields J. The prenatal psychosocial profile: A research and clinical tool. Res Nurs Health 1998; 21(3): 211-219.
• [7] Woods SM, Melville JL, Guo Y, et al. Psychosocial stress during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 2010; 202(1): 61.e1-7.
• [8] Gümüşdaş M, Apay SE, Özorhan E. Comparison of psycho-social health in pregnant women with and without risk. HSP. 2014; 1(2): 32-42.
• [9] Mermer G, Bilge A, Yücel U, Çeber E. Evaluation of perceived social support levels in pregnancy and postpartum periods. J Psychiatr Nurs 2010; 1(2): 71-76.
• [10] Kim TH, Connolly JA, Tamim H. The effect of social support around pregnancy on postpartum depression among canadian teen mothers and adult mothers in the maternity experiences survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14(1): 162.
• [11] Yıldırım A, Hacıhasanoğlu R, Karakurt P. The relationship between postpartum depression and social support and affecting factors. IJHS 2011; 8(1): 31-46.
• [12] Anık Y. Relation of Psycho-Social Health Status of Pregnant Women with the Risk of Depression. T.C. Necmettin Erbakan University Health Sciences Institute, Master Thesis, Konya; 2017.
• [13] Karamustafa FC. Examination of marital satisfaction and selfesteem in postpartum depression. T.C. Isik University Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis, Istanbul; 2017.
• [14] Taşpınar A. Characteristics associated with self-esteem and body image in pregnancy. T. C. Haliç University Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis, Istanbul; 2015.
• [15] Kumcağız H. Pregnant women, body image and self-esteem according to the examination of some of the variables. IJHS 2012; 9(2): 691-703.
• [16] Santos PC, Ferreira MI, Teixeira RJ, et al. Physical activity and self-esteem during pregnancy. International Journal of Psychology Neuroscience. 2016; 2(6): 112-136.
• [17] Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Prenatal Care. İçinde Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. (Eds.), Williams Obstetrics, 23rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York; 2010. 195.
• [18] Taşkın L, Kukul K. Introduction to Women's Health. In: Taşkın L. (Ed.), Maternity and Women 's Health Nursing. Ankara; 2012. pp. 1-16.
• [19] Curry MA, Campbell RA, Christian M. Validity and reliability testing of the prenatal psychosocial profile. Res Nurs Health 1994; 17(2): 127-135.
• [20] Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000; 25(24): 3186–3191.
• [21] Talbot LA. Principles and Practice of Nursing Research. Mosby Year Book, USA; 1995.
• [22] Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Guidelines for crosscultural adaptation of scales II: psychometric properties and cross-cultural comparison. HEMAR-GE. 2003; 4(2): 9-20.
• [23] Akgül A, Çevik O. Statistical Analysis Techniques. Emek Ofset, Ankara; 2005.
• [24] Karasar N. Scientific Research Method. 7th Edition. Ankara; 1995.