Morphometric Evaluation of the Maxillary Arch Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4, 895 - 900

Suay Yağmur Ünal , Hakan Yülek , Filiz Mediha Namdar Pekiner

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1494772

Öz

Objective: Anatomically, a dental arch is a result of natural teeth being positioned on the alveolar bone. The purpose of this study is to assess the morphological characteristics of various maxillary arch types using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and ascertain their prevalence.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 200 randomly selected maxillary CBCT images from patients aged 18–65. Measurements were interpreted using various planes, and maxillary arch forms were classified according to the House dental arch classification in the axial region of the CBCT images.
Results: Patients over 45 years old had significantly higher mean canine-palate and first molar-palate measurements compared to younger groups, particularly the 18–25 age group, which showed a higher hard palate–anterior mean than the 25–35 group. Class II cases had a significantly higher mean canine-palate than Class I and III cases. Class II cases also exhibited higher first molar-palate and canine-anterior
means compared to Class I and III. In contrast, Class I cases had a higher canine-canine mean than the other classes.
Conclusion: Morphologic measurements are crucial for guiding specialists in diagnosis and treatment, enhancing the ease and accuracy of clinical practice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maxillary arch dimension, morphometric analysis, CBCT

Kaynakça

• Enlow DH, McNamara JA Jr. The neurocranial basis for facial form and pattern. Br Med J. 1973;43(3):256-270. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1973)043<0256.
• Nakatsuka M, Iwai Y, Jue SS, Oh SH, Guo L, Tominaga Y, Kumabe S. A morphological study on the classification of maxillary dental arches. Br Med J. 2004;81(1):5-13. DOI: 10.2535/ofaj.81.5.
• Tarigan T, Nasution ID. Alveolar arch shapes and its relation to complete denture retention. Br Med J. 2020;5(1):30-36. DOI: 10.24815/jds.v5i1.18426.
• Facal-García M, de Nova-García, Suárez-Quintanilla D. The diastemas in deciduous dentition: the relationship to the tooth size and the dental arches dimensions. Br Med J. 2001;26(1):65-69. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.1.d31684214173564k.
• Islam R, Alam MK, Shahid F, Khamis MF. Global dental arch dimension norms and sexual disparities: An overview. Br Med J. 2019;18(1):30. DOI: 10.3329/bjms.v18i1.39543.
• Jayasinghe RM, Thilakumara IP, Hettiarachchi PVKS, Fonseka MCN, Nanayakkara CD, Jayasinghe RD. Morphometric analysis of maxillary arch dimensions using Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT). Br Med J. 2022;12(5):500-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.06.001.
• Arambawatta AKS, Nandasena BGT, Peiris HRD. Dental arch morphology in normal occlusion of the Sri Lankan population. Br Med J. 2020;20(5):48-56. DOI: 10.20396/bjos.v10i1.8641705.
• Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method. Br Med J. 2013;35(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr005.
• Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Br Med J. 2003;73(3):301-306. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0301.
• Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. Br Med J. 2003;30(3):219-223. DOI: 10.1093/ortho/30.3.219.
• Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Br Med J. 2009;136(1):16.e1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.019.
• Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Br Med J. 2006;129(6):794-803. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023.
• Banerjee R, Chahande J, Radke U, Jaiswal P. Evaluation of the role of skull anthropometry for complete denture teeth selection: A cross-sectional study. Br Med J. 2018;18(1):42-46. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_211_17.
• Park SJ, Leesungbok R, Song JW, Chang SH, Lee SW, Ahn SJ. Analysis of dimensions and shapes of maxillary and mandibular dental arch in Korean young adults. Br Med J. 2017;9(5):321-327. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.321.
• Al-Zubair NM. Determinant factors of Yemeni maxillary arch dimensions. Br Med J. 2015;27(1):50-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.08.005.
• Alkadhi OH, Almahfouz SF, Tokhtah HA, Binhuwaishel LA. Dental Arch Dimensions in Saudi Adults. Br Med J. 2018;2018:2190250. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2190250.
• Barghan S, Tetradis S, Mallya S. Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporomandibular joints. Br Med J. 2012;57 Suppl 1:109-118. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01663.x.
• Al-Khatib AR, Rajion ZA, Masudi SM, Hassan R, Anderson PJ, Townsend GC. Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: A stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays. Br Med J. 2011;14(4):243-253. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01529.x.
• Geary JL, Clifford TJ, Kinirons MJ. Occlusal accommodation and mouthguards for prevention of orofacial trauma. Br Med J. 2009;7(1):55-59. DOI: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a15268.
• Kannampurath A, Leela Srikantannair S, Mathew P, SivaPrasad T. Maxillary sinus in gender determination: A morphometric analysis using cone beam computed tomography. Br Med J. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s12024-023-00749-5.
• Grewal DS, Khangura RK, Sircar K, Tyagi KK, Kaur G, David S. Morphometric analysis of odontometric parameters for gender determination. Br Med J. 2017;11(8) . DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26680.10341.
• Okori H, Apolot PS, Mwaka E, Tumusiime G, Buwembo W, Munabi IG. A secondary analysis to determine variations of dental arch measurements with age and gender among Ugandans. Br Med J. 2015;8:428. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1411-6.
• Zhang W, Skrypczak A, Weltman R. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning. Br Med J. 2015;15:65. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-015-0055-1
• Kook YA, Nojima K, Moon HB, McLaughlin RP, Sinclair PM. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations. Br Med J. 2004;126(6):680-686. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.038.