A CULTURAL ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF KARL MARX'S POLITICAL ECONOMY AND MAX WEBER'S SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION: TAKVA

Abstract

The subject of religion in Turkish cinema has been handled with different dimensions from the past to the present and has been one of the most important main materials of our cinema in every period. The 2006 film Takva stands at a different point in terms of dealing with religion in a realistic way in terms of economy and politics. Movies are visual products in terms of their narrative structure, and the ideological messages they want to convey are conveyed largely through images. This study consists of two parts. In the first part of the study, the analysis of the movie Takva according to Greimas' Acting Example was made. In this context, subject-object opposition on the will axis, sender-receiver opposition on the communication axis, and auxiliary-blocker opposition on the power axis are put forward. It has been tried to explain how the meaning is constructed by revealing the syntactic and serial elements in the film. In the second part of the study, an ideological analysis was made in the context of Karl Marx's political economy and Max Weber's sociology of religion. It has been tried to explain the ideologies underlying the syntactic and serial elements of the film.

Keywords

• taqwa
• religion
• Karl Marx
• Max Weber
• political economy
• Turkish cinema

References

1. Bottomore, T. (1993). Marxist Düşünce Sözlüğü, (Trans). Mete Tunçay. İstanbul: İletişim Pub.
2. Bozkurt, V. (2012). Değişen Dünyada Sosyoloji- Temeller Kavramlar Kurumlar. Bursa: Ekin Pub.
3. Cevizci, A. (1999). Felsefe Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Paradigma Pub. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı (2009). Dini Terimler Sözlüğü: İmam-Hatip ve Anadolu İmam-Hatip Lisesi Öğrencileri İçin, Ankara: MEB Pub.
4. Durkheim, E. (2005). Dini Hayatın İlkel Biçimleri. (Trans.) Fuat Aydın. İstanbul: Ataç Pub.
5. Fiske, J. (2014). İletişim Çalışmalarına Giriş. (Trans.) Süleyman İrvan. Ankara: Ark Pub.
6. Giddens, A. (2012). Sosyoloji. İstanbul: Kırmızı Pub.
7. Giddens, A. (2020). Modernliğin Sonuçları. (Trans.) Ersin Kuşdil. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Pub.
8. Hançerlioğlu, O. (1984). İslam İnançları Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Remzi Pub.

9. Hançerlioğlu, O. (2021). Düşünce Tarihi- Dört Bin Yılık Düşün, Sanat ve Bilim Tarihinin Klasik Yapıtları Üstüne Eleştirel Bir İnceleme. İstanbul: Remzi Pub.
10. Hayward, S. (2012). Sinemanın Temel Kavramları. (Trans.) Uğur Kutay ve Metin Çavuş. İstanbul: Es Pub.
11. Karakaya, H. (2016). Kırsal hayatta modernite karşıtı olarak din adamı imajının Türk sinemasına yansımaları. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2(1). 57-75.
12. Karakaya, H. (2018). Türk sinemasında din adamı tiplemesi. Munzur Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (12), 48-69.