Yıl 2019, Cilt 5 , Sayı 1, Sayfalar 34 - 54 2019-05-31

Yazma Başarısı Düşük Olan İleri Seviye Öğrencilerin Yazma Becerisi Problemlerinin Nitel bir Araştırması
A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey

Özkan KIRMIZI [1] , Emine AYDIN [2]


Bu çalışma lisans öğrencilerinin lisans eğitimi sırasında yazma becerileri ile ilgili karşılaştıkları problemleri nitel olarak belirlemek ve bu problemlere yönelik çözümlerini tespit etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmaya, Türkiye'de bir devlet üniversitesinde kayıtlı on İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı bölümü lisans öğrencisi katılmıştır. Bu çalışma bir durum çalışması olarak tasarlanmıştır. Katılımcıları seçmek için ölçüt örneklem ve maksimum çeşitlilik örnekleme yöntemleri birlikte kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya katılım için belirlenen ölçüt öğrencilerin Yazma Becerileri I ve Yazma Becerileri II derslerini almış ve birinden veya her ikisinden başarısız olmuş olmaktır. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formlarıyla toplanmıştır ve içerik analizi ve betimsel analiz teknikleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, İDE öğrencilerinin eleştirel düşünme konusundaki problemlerini çoğunlukla akademik yazılarda yaşadıklarını ve bu problemlerin daha çok yazma endişesinden kaynaklandığını ve problemlerin çözülmesinde en önemli etkenin olumlu geribildirim olduğunu ortaya koydu. Ayrıca öğretim üyelerinin yazma derslerinde farklı stratejiler uygulamalarının öğrencilere çok büyük katkı sağlayacağı tespit edilmiştir.

The present study was undertaken in order to qualitatively determine the problems that undergraduate students encountered during their undergraduate education and to detect their solution for these problems. Ten undergraduate English Language and Literature department students enrolled at a state university in Turkey participated the study. The study was designed as a case study. Criterion sampling and maximum variation sampling were used in tandem to select the participants. The criterion was to attend Writing Skills I and Writing Skills II courses and fail from one or both. The data were gathered through semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed through content and descriptive analysis. Results revealed that ELL students experience problems in critical thinking mostly in academic writing and that these problems are more often caused by writing anxiety, and that positive feedback is the most important factor in solving the problems. It was also found that lecturers’ applying a variety of strategies in writing courses makes a great contribution to students.

  • Ahmed, A. (2010). Students' problems with cohesion and coherence in EFL essay writing in Egypt: Different perspectives. Literary Information and Computer Education Journal, 1(4), 211-221.
  • Abdel Latif, M. M. (2012), Sources of L2 writing apprehension: a study of Egyptian university students. Journal of Research in Reading. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01549.
  • Alpaslan, Ö. (2002). The Writing strategies of three freshman students at Middle East Technical, Unpublished master’s thesis, University. Ankara
  • Atay, D. and Kurt, G. (2006). Prospective teachers and L2 writing anxiety. Asian EFL Journal, 8(4):100-118.
  • Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive view. Eaglewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  • Brown, S. C., Stevens, R. A., Jr., Troiano, P. F., & Schneider, M. K. (2002). Exploring complex phenomena: Grounded theory in student affairs research. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 173-183.
  • Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35 (1), 25-37.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (7. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Byram, M. (1989). Cultural Studies in Foreign Language Education: Clevedan Multilingual Matters.
  • Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical basis of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1, 1-47.
  • Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Csizér, K., & Tankó, G. (2017). English majors’ self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 38, 386-404.
  • Cheng, Y. S., Horwitz, E. K., and Schallert, D. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49(3):417-446.
  • Cheng, Y. S. (2002). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annuals, 35(5), 647-56.
  • Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4):313-335.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Doğanay, A. , Taş Akbulut, M. & Erden Ş. (2007) . Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Bir Güncel Tartışmalı Konu Bağlamında Eleştirel Düşünme Becerilerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 13(52):511-546.
  • Erkan, D. Y., & Saban, A. I. (2011). Writing Performance Relative to Writing Apprehension, Self-Efficacy in Writing, and Attitudes towards Writing: A Correlational Study in Turkish Tertiary-Level EFL. Asian EFL journal, 5(4), 164-192
  • Fatemi, A. H., and Vahidnia, F. (2013). An Investigation into Iranian EFL Learners’ Level of Writing Self-efficacy, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), pp. 1698-1704
  • Fukao, A. & Fujii, T. (2001). Investigating difficulties in the academic writing process: Interview as a research tool. ICU Language Research Bulletin, 16, 29-40.
  • Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266-272.Gere, A. R. (1987). Writing groups: History, theory and implications. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Glesne, C. (2012). Nitel araştırmaya giriş. A. Ersoy ve P. Yalçınoğlu (Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Anı.
  • Golshan, M. and Karbalaei, A. (2009). Grammatical Problems in the Writings of EFL Undergraduate Learners, South Asian Language Review, 19(1-2), 1-11.
  • Johns, A. M. (2011). The future of genre in L2 writing: Fundamental, but contested, instructional decisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 56–68.
  • Hammad, E.A. (2014). Palestinian University Students' Problems with EFL Essay Writing in an Instructional Setting, Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition, 2(1), 1-21.
  • Hassan, B. (2001). The Relationship of Writing Apprehension and Self-Esteem to the Writing Quality and Quantity of EFL University Students. Mansoura Faculty of Education Journal, 39, 1-36.
  • Hawthorne, K. A., Bol, L., & Pribesh, S. (2017). Can providing rubrics for writing tasks improve developing writers' calibration accuracy? The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(4), 689–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.129908.
  • Hilgard, E. Atkinson, R. L., & Atkinson, R. C. (1979). Introduction to psychology (7th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Kara, S. (2013). Writing Anxiety: A Case study on students' reasons for anxiety in writing process. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1),103-111.
  • Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 261–278.
  • Kırmızı, Ö., & Kırmızı, G. (2015). An Investigation of L2 Learners’ Writing Self-Efficacy, Writing Anxiety and Its Causes at Higher Education in Turkey. International Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 4, No. 2 57-66
  • Kramsch, C. (2001). Language, culture and voice in the teaching of English as a foreign language. NovELTy: A Journal of English Language Teaching and Cultural Studies in Hungary, 8(1), 4-21.
  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • Lavelle, E. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy for writing. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(4-1), 73-84
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Language anxiety: Its relation to other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language Learning, 41, 513-534.
  • Matsuda, A., & Matsuda, P. K. (2010). World Englishes and the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 369-374.
  • McCarthy, P., Meier, S., & Rinderer, R. (1985). Self-efficacy and writing: A different view of self-evaluation. College Composition and Communication, 36(4), 465-471.
  • Mojica, L. (2010). An investigation on self-reported writing problems and actual writing deficiencies of EFL learners in the beginners' level. TESOL Journal, 2, 24-38
  • Negari, G.M. (2011). A study on strategy instruction EFL learners’ writing. International journal of English linguistics. 1(2), 299-307.
  • Negretti, R. (2017). Calibrating genre: Metacognitive judgments and rhetorical effectiveness in academic writing by L2 graduate students. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 512–539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv051 First published online Oct. 29, 2015.
  • Negrettia, R. and McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course, Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12-31.
  • Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation and achievement in writing. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139-158.
  • Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426-443.
  • Pineteh, E.A. (2014). The Academic Writing Challenges of Undergraduate Students: A South African Case Study, International Journal of Higher Education 3(1), 12-22.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
  • Rezaei, M.M., Jafari, S.M. and Younas, M. (2014). Iranian EFL Students’ Writing Anxiety: Levels, Causes and Implications, English for Specific Purposes World, 42(15), 1-10.
  • Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal, 61 (2).
  • Sawyer, R., Graham. S., & Harris, K.R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on learning disabled students‟ compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340- 352
  • Schweiker-Marra, K. E. & Marra, W. T. (2000). Investigating the effects of prewriting activities on writing performance and anxiety of at-risk students. Reading Psychology, 21, 99–114.
  • Staples, S. & Reppen, R. (2016). Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings, Journal of Second Language Writing 32, 17–35.
  • Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., & Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 91–100.
  • Şaraplı, O. (2013). Academic essay writing in Turkish higher education system: critical thinking or readymade structure? International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(2)
  • Walters, J. & Bozkurt N. (2009). The effect of keeping vocabulary notebooks on vocabulary acquisition. Language Teaching Research 13(4), pp. 403–423.
  • Wette, R. (2010). Evaluating student learning in a university-level EAP unit on writing using sources. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 158–177.
  • Woodrow, L. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39, 510-522.
  • Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 111-33.
  • Yasuda, S. (2015). Exploring changes in FL writers’ meaning-making choices in summary writing: A systemic functional approach, Journal of Second Language Writing 27, 105–121.
  • Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Sosyal
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0003-3419-8257
Yazar: Özkan KIRMIZI (Sorumlu Yazar)
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0002-6613-6731
Yazar: Emine AYDIN

Tarihler

Yayımlanma Tarihi : 31 Mayıs 2019

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { crd547622, journal = {Current Research in Education}, issn = {2149-6285}, address = {}, publisher = {Aizonia Publishing}, year = {2019}, volume = {5}, pages = {34 - 54}, doi = {}, title = {A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey}, key = {cite}, author = {KIRMIZI, Özkan and AYDIN, Emine} }
APA KIRMIZI, Ö , AYDIN, E . (2019). A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey. Current Research in Education , 5 (1) , 34-54 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/crd/issue/45590/547622
MLA KIRMIZI, Ö , AYDIN, E . "A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey". Current Research in Education 5 (2019 ): 34-54 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/crd/issue/45590/547622>
Chicago KIRMIZI, Ö , AYDIN, E . "A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey". Current Research in Education 5 (2019 ): 34-54
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey AU - Özkan KIRMIZI , Emine AYDIN Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - DO - T2 - Current Research in Education JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 34 EP - 54 VL - 5 IS - 1 SN - 2149-6285- M3 - UR - Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Current Research in Education A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey %A Özkan KIRMIZI , Emine AYDIN %T A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey %D 2019 %J Current Research in Education %P 2149-6285- %V 5 %N 1 %R %U
ISNAD KIRMIZI, Özkan , AYDIN, Emine . "A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey". Current Research in Education 5 / 1 (Mayıs 2019): 34-54 .
AMA KIRMIZI Ö , AYDIN E . A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey. Current Research in Education. 2019; 5(1): 34-54.
Vancouver KIRMIZI Ö , AYDIN E . A Qualitative Analysis of Writing Problems of Low Achieving Advanced Learners in Turkey. Current Research in Education. 2019; 5(1): 54-34.