Hassasiyet Giderici Diş Macunlarının Farklı Restoratif Materyallerin Kron ve Kök Dentinine Bağlanma Kuvveti Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2018, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 93 - 102, 29.07.2018

Kıvanç Yamanel Neslihan Arhun

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.408762

Öz

Amaç: Bu
çalışmanın amacı, iki farklı hassasiyet giderici diş macununun kompozit rezin
ve cam iyonomer restoratif materyallerin kron ve kök dentinine makaslama
bağlanma dayanımları üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: 108
adet insan üçüncü molar dişinin meziyal veya distal yüzeyleri zımpara yardımıyla
düzleştirildi. Örnekler aşağıdaki diş macunlarıyla fırçalanmak üzere rastgele 3
ana gruba ayrıldı (N=36): A Grubu: Sensodyne Rapid Relief; B Grubu: Colgate
Sensitive Pro-Relief; C Grubu: Colgate Total 12. Fırçalama
işlemi, bir fırçalama simülatöründe toplam 10 gün süreyle, günde 2 kez ve her
fırçalamada 10 fırça darbesi şeklinde gerçekleştirildi. Örnekler daha sonra
kron ve kök dentinine aşağıdaki adezyon protokollerinin uygulanması için üçer
alt gruba (n=12) ayrıldı. Grup 1: Clearfil SE Bond + Filtek
Z250 kompozit; Group2: Adper Single Bond2 + Filtek
Z250 kompozit; Group3: Riva cam iyonomer siman. Örnekler 24 saat süreyle
distile suda bekletildi. Makaslama bağlanma dayanımı testi üniversal test
cihazıyla gerçekleştirildi(kafa hızı 0.5 mm/s). Elde edilen veriler
istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi.

Bulgular:  Bütün restoratif teknikler
değerlendirildiğinde en düşük makaslama bağlanma dayanımı değerleri, Sensodyne
Rapid Relief kullanımından sonra elde edilmiştir. Riva cam iyonomer siman,
kompozit rezinden istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük makaslama
bağlanma dayanımı değerleri sergilemiştir.

Sonuç:Hassasiyet
giderici diş macunu kullanımı sonrası self etch sistemlerin kullanılması
adezyon açısından daha uygun olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hassasiyet giderici diş macunu, kron dentini, kök dentini, bağlanma dayanımı.

The Effect of Desensitizing-Toothpastes on the Bond Strength of Different Restoratives on Coronal/Root Dentin

Öz

Aim: The aim
of the study was to evaluate the effects of two desensitizing tooth-pastes on
the shear bond strength of resin composite and glass ionomer restorative
materials to coronal and root dentin.

Materials
and Methods: 108 human third molars’ distal or mesial sides
were ground flat with a silicon-carbide paper. The samples were randomly
divided into 3-major groups (N=36) to be brushed with: Group A: Sensodyne Rapid
Relief; Group B: Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief; Group C: Colgate Total 12
toothpastes. Brushing was performed with tooth brushing simulator 2 times/day
for 10 days with 10 strokes/brushing. They were further divided into three
sub-groups (n=12) to receive the following adhesion protocols to coronal/root
dentin. Group 1: Clearfil SE Bond + Filtek Z250 Composite; Group 2: Adper
Single Bond2 + Filtek Z250Composite; Group 3: Riva Glass Ionomer Cement.
Samples were kept in distilled water for 24 hours. Shear bond strength test was
performed with Universal Test Machine (cross head speed: 0.5 mm/sec). The data
were evaluated statistically.

Results:
For all restorative techniques evaluated, the least shear
bond strength values were obtained after Sensodyne Rapid Relief usage. Riva
Glass Ionomer Cement demonstrated statistically significant inferior shear bond
strength values than resin composite.

Conclusion:
Self-etch systems may be the choice for adhesion
after desensitizing toothpaste usage.

Anahtar Kelimeler

desensitizing tooth paste, coronal dentin, root dentin, bond strength

Kaynakça

• 1. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity.Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity.J Can Dent Assoc. 2003 Apr;69(4):221-6.
• 2. Chu CH, Lo ECM. Dentin hypersensitivity: a review. Hong Kong Dent J 2010;7:15-22.
• 3. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D.Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine.J Clin Periodontol. 1987 May;14(5):280-4.
• 4. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity. The development and evaluation of a replica technique to study sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine.J Clin Periodontol. 1989 Mar;16(3):190-5.
• 5. Cummins D. Dentin Hypersensitivity: From Diagnosis to a Breakthrough Therapy for Everyday Sensitivity Relief. J Clin Dent 20 (Spec Iss):1–9, 2009.
• 6. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity.J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Jul;137(7):990-8.
• 7. Cortiano FM, Rached RN, Mazur RF, Vieira S, Freire A, de Souza EM. Effect of desensitizing agents on the microtensile bond strength of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2016; 124: 309-315.
• 8. Sabatini C, Wu Z. Effect of desensitizing agents on the bond strength of mild and strong self-ethching adhesives. Oper Dent. 2015; 40: 548-57.
• 9. Kobler A, Schaller HG, Gernhardt CD. Effects of the desensitizing agents Gluma and Hyposen on the tensile bond strength of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2008, 21:388-392.
• 10. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Danser MM, Van der Velden U.Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 May;25(5):413-6.
• 11. Volpenhein DW, Walsh ME, Dellerman PA, Burkett TA.A new method for in vitro evaluation of the interproximal penetration of manual toothbrushes. J Clin Dent. 1994;5(1):27-33.
• 12. ISO. Dental materials—guidance on testing of wear resistance. Part 1. Wear by tooth brushing. Technical Specification 1999; No. 14569-1.
• 13. Neme, A.L., Frazier, K.B., Roeder, L.B., Debner, T.L. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2002;27:50–58.
• 14. dos Santos, P.H., Consani, S., Correr Sobrinho, L., Coelho Sinhoreti, M.A. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on roughness of posterior composite resins. Am J Dent. 2003;16:197–201.
• 15. Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Vergani EC, Pavarina AC, Salles DSL, Jorge JH. Weight loss and changes in surface roughness of denture base and reline materials after simulated toothbrushing in vitro. Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e121-7.
• 16. Volpenhein DW,Walsh ME, Dellerman PA, Burkett TA. A new method for in vitro evaluation of the interproximal penetration of manual toothbrushes. J Clin Dent 1994;5:27–33.
• 17. Macgregor ID, Rugg-Gunn AJ. Toothbrushing duration in 60 uninstructed young adults. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985;13:121–2.
• 18. Saxer UP, Barbakow J, Yankell SL. New studies on estimated and actual toothbrushing times and dentifrice use. J Clin Dent 1998;9:49–51.
• 19. da Costa J, Adams-Belusko A, Riley K, Ferracane JL. The effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2010;38:E123–8.
• 20. Arnold WH, Prange M, Naumova EA. Effectiveness of various toothpastes on dentine tubule occlusion. J Dent 2015;43;440-9.
• 21. Addy, M., Mostafa, P. Dentine hypersensitivity. I. Effects produced by the uptake in vitro of metal ions, fluoride and formaldehyde onto dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 1988;15:575–585.
• 22. Addy, M., Mostafa, P. Dentine hypersensitivity. II. Effects produced by the uptake in vitro of toothpastes onto dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 1989;16:35–48.
• 23. Joshi, S., Gowda, A.S., Joshi, C. Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Perio & Implant Sci. 2013;43:269–275.
• 24. Petrou, I., Heu, R., Stranick, M., Lavender, S., Zaidel, L., Cummins, D. et al, A breakthrough therapy for dentin hypersensitivity: how dental products containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate work to deliver effective relief of sensitive teeth. JClin Dent. 2009;20:23–31.
• 25. Lavender, S.A., Petrou, I., Heu, R., Stranick, M.A., Cummins, D., Kilpatrick-Liverman, L. et al, Mode of action studies on a new desensitizing dentifrice containing 8.0% arginine, a high cleaning calcium carbonate system and 1450 ppm fluoride. Am J Dent. 2010;23:14A–19A.
• 26. Parkinson CR, Butler A, Wilson RJ. Development of an acid-challange based in vitro dentin disc occlusion model. J Clin Dent. 2010;21:31-36.
• 27. Parkinson CR, Wilson RJ. An in vitro investigation of two currently marketed dentin tubule occlusion dentifrices. J Clin Dent. 2011; 22: 6-10.
• 28. Ayad, F., Ayad, N., Zhang, Y.P., DeVizio, W., Cummins, D., Mateo, L.R. Comparing the efficacy in reducing dentin hypersensitivity of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride to a commercial sensitive toothpaste containing 2% potassium ion: an eight-week clinical study on Canadian adults. J Clin Dent. 2009;20:10–16.
• 29. Docimo, R., Montesani, L., Maturo, P., Costacurta, M., Bartolino, M., Zhang, Y.P. et al, Comparing the efficacy in reducing dentin hypersensitivity of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride to a benchmark commercial desensitizing toothpaste containing 2% potassium ion: an eight-week clinical study in Rome, Italy. JClin Dent. 2009;20:137–143.
• 30. Earl, J.S., Leary, R.K., Muller, K.H., Langford, R.M., Greenspan, D.C. Physical and chemical characterization of dentin surface following treatment with NovaMin technology. J Clin Dent. 2011;22:62–67.
• 31. Akagawa, H., Nikaido, T., Takada, T., Burrow, M.F., Tagami, J. Shear bond strengths to coronal and pulp chamber floor dentin. Am J Dent. 2002;15:383–388.
• 32. Foxton, R.M., Nakajima, M., Tagami, J., Miura, H. Bonding of photo and dual-cure adhesives to root canal dentin. Oper Dent. 2003;28:543–551.
• 33. Pereira, P.N., Okuda, M., Sano, H., Yoshikawa, T., Burrow, M.F., Tagami, J. Effect of intrinsic wetness and regional difference on dentin bond strength. Dent Mater. 1999;15:46–53.
• 34. Yoshikawa, T., Sano, H., Burrow, M.F., Tagami, J., Pashley, D.H. Effect of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res. 1999;78:898–905.
• 35. Giannini, M., Carvalho, R.M., Martins, L.R., Dias, C.T., Pashley, D.H. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. J Adhes Dent.2001;3:315–324.
• 36. De Goes MF, Giannini M, Foxton RM, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strengthbetween crown and root dentin and two adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97: 223-8.
• 37. Powis DR, Folleras T, Merson AS & Wilson AD. Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. J Dent Res. 1982; 61: 1416–1422.
• 38. Lin A, Mcintyre NS & Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res. 1992; 71: 1836-1841.