Number of File Usage on Dentinal Defect Incidence of WaveOne GOLD and Reciproc NiTi Instruments

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3, 216 - 223, 17.10.2018

Koray Yılmaz Taha Özyürek Gülşah Uslu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.423644

Öz

Abstract

Objectives:To compare the incidences of dentinal defects caused by Reciproc and WaveOne GOLD NiTi files during root canal preparation and to exam the effect of number of file usage on the incidence of dentinal defect. 

Materials and Methods:Two hundred seventy mandibular incisor teeth were randomly divided into 3 different groups as follows: negative control (no preparation performed) (n: 30), Reciproc (n: 120) and WaveOne GOLD (n: 120) groups. The specimens were sliced at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. Microscopic pictures of the specimens were taken with the aid of light emitting diode and the dentinal defects were examined. 

Results:There was no statistically difference among the WaveOne GOLD, Reciproc and control groups in terms of dentinal defect formation. The number of dentinal defects occurred in apical region in Reciproc group following 4^thuse was found to be statistically higher than 1^st, 2^nd, and 3^rduse in WaveOne GOLD group (P< .05).

Conclusion:All the NiTi files tested in present study were found to cause defect in root canal dentin but there were not significant difference among the WaveOne GOLD, Reciproc and control groups in term of total dentinal defect formation

Anahtar Kelimeler

Reciproc; WaveOne GOLD; Usage; Crack; Dentinal Defect

Kaynakça

• 1. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30:559-67.2. Blum J, Cohen A, Machtou P, Micallef JP. Analysis of forces developed during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth using Profile NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 1999;32:24-31.3. Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. J Endod 20042012;38:232-5.4. Kiefner P, Ban M, De‐Deus G. Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments? Int Endod J 2014;47:430-6.5. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 2012;45:449-61.6. WaveOne GOLD brochure. https://www.dentsply.com/content/dam/dentsply/pim/manufacturer/Endodontics/Obturation/Gutta_Percha_Points/WaveOne_Gold_Gutta_Percha_Points/W1G_Brochure_EN.pdf (Access in November 2016).7. Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after prolonged clinical use. Int Endod J 2001;34:386-9.8. Bahia MGA, Buono VTL. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:249-55.9. Yared G, Dagher F, Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after clinical use. Int Endod J 2000;33:204-7.10. Wolcott S, Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S, et al. Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation. J Endod 2006;32:1139-41.11. Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Uysal B. Effects of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin. J Endod 2014;40:1482-84.12. Shemesh H, Bier C, Wu MK, Tanomaru‐Filho M, Wesselink P. The effects of canal preparation and filling on the incidence of dentinal defects. Int Endod J 2009;42:208-13.13. Hin ES, Wu M-K, Wesselink PR, Shemesh H. Effects of self-adjusting file, Mtwo, and ProTaper on the root canal wall. J Endod 2013;39:262-4.14. Capar ID, Uysal B, Ok E, Arslan H. Effect of the size of the apical enlargement with rotary instruments, single-cone filling, post space preparation with drills, fiber post removal, and root canal filling removal on apical crack initiation and propagation. J Endod 2015;41:253-6.15. De-Deus G, Silva EJNL, Marins J, Souza E, de Almeida Neves A, Belladonna FG, et al. Lack of causal relationship between dentinal microcracks and root canal preparation with reciprocation systems. J Endod 2014;40:1447-50.16. American Association of Endodontists. Transillumination: The “Light Detector.” Chicago: AAE; 2008:1–2.17. Coelho MS, Card SJ, Tawil PZ. Visualization Enhancement of Dentinal Defects by Using Light-Emitting Diode Transillumination. J Endod 2016;42:1110-3.18. Coelho MS, Card SJ, Tawil PZ. Light-emitting Diode Assessment of Dentinal Defects after Root Canal Preparation with Profile, TRUShape, and WaveOne Gold Systems. J Endod 2016;42:1393-6.19. Kim H-C, Kwak S-W, Cheung GS-P, Ko D-H, Chung S-M, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012;38:541-4.20. Plotino G, Grande N, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 2012;45:614-8.21. Yamazaki‐Arasaki A, Cabrales R, Santos MD, Kleine B, Prokopowitsch I. Topography of four different endodontic rotary systems, before and after being used for the 12th time. Micros Res Tech 2012;75:97-102.22. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-5.23. Pirani C, Paolucci A, Ruggeri O, Bossù M, Polimeni A, Gatto MRA, et al. Wear and metallographic analysis of WaveOne and Reciproc NiTi instruments before and after three uses in root canals. Scanning 2014;36:517-25.24. Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Sannino G, Di Giorgio F, Piasecki L, Al-Sudani D, et al. Cutting efficiency of nickel–titanium rotary and reciprocating instruments after prolonged use. Odontology 2016;104:77-81.25. Peng B, Shen Y, Cheung G, Xia T. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: longitudinal examination. Int Endod J 2005;38:550-7.26. Arantes WB, da Silva CM, Lage‐Marques JL, Habitante S, da Rosa LCL, de Medeiros JMF. SEM analysis of defects and wear on Ni–Ti rotary instruments. Scanning 2014;36(4):411-418.27. El Nasr HMA, El Kader KGA. Dentinal damage and fracture resistance of oval roots prepared with single-file systems using different kinematics. J Endod 2014;40:849-51.28. Plotino G, Rubini AG, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cutting efficiency of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2014;40:1228-30.29. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2006;39:196-202.30. Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P. Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Am J Dent 2001;14:324-33.31. Karataş E, Gündüz H, Kırıcı D, Arslan H. Incidence of dentinal cracks after root canal preparation with ProTaper Gold, Profile Vortex, F360, Reciproc and ProTaper Universal instruments. Int Endod J 2016;49:905-10.32. Kim H-C, Lee M-H, Yum J, Versluis A, Lee C-J, Kim B-M. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture. J Endod 2010;36:1195-9.33. Versluis A, Messer H, Pintado M. Changes in compaction stress distributions in roots resulting from canal preparation. Int Endod J 2006;39:931-9.34. Bürklein S, Tsotsis P, Schäfer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2013;39:501-4.35. Coelho MS, Card SJ, Tawil PZ. Light-emitting Diode Assessment of Dentinal Defects after Root Canal Preparation with Profile, TRUShape, and WaveOne Gold Systems. J Endod 2016;42:1393-6.