Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2019, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 241 - 248, 31.05.2019
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.517566

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Masters DH, Tatum H Jr. Dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 1210.
  • 2. Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 80-90.
  • 3. Berge TI. Public awareness, information sources, and evaluation of oral implant treatment in Norway. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000: 11; 401-8.
  • 4. Albrektsson, T, Zarb G, Worthington P. Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986: 1; 11–25.
  • 5. Nearby B, Bagewitz IC, Soderfeldt B. Factors explaining the desire for dental implant therapy: Analysis of the results from a longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24: 437-44.
  • 6. Nearby B, Kronström M, Söderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Changes in attitudes toward a desire for implant treatment: A longitudinal study of a middle-aged and older Swedish population. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 481-5.
  • 7. Grogono AL, Lancaster DM, Finger IM. Dental implants: a survey of patients’ attitudes. J Prosthet Dent 1989: 62; 573-6.
  • 8. Al-Hamdan K. Patients’ satisfaction with dental implants in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2007: 19; 6-11.
  • 9. Zimmer CM, Zimmer WM, William J, Liesener J. public awareness and acceptance of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 228-32.
  • 10. Al-Johany S, Al Zoman HA, Al Juhaini M, Al Refeai M. Dental patients’ awareness and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: A survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2010: 22; 183-8.
  • 11. Kohli S, Bhatia S, Kaur A, Rathakrishnan T. Public knowledge and acceptance of dental implant treatment in Malaysian Population. J Interdiscip Dent 2014: 4; 76-80.
  • 12. Salonen MA. Assessment of states of dentures and interest in implant-retained prosthetic treatment in 55-year-old edentulous Finns. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994; 22: 130-5.
  • 13. Best, H.A., 1993. Awareness and needs of dental implants by patients in New South Wales. Aust. Prosthodont. J. 7, 9–12.
  • 14. Guyatt GH, Cook DJ. Health status, quality of life, and the individual. JAMA 1994; 272: 630-1.
  • 15. Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, et al. Progress and trends in patients’ mindset on dental implants. I: Level of information, sources of information and the need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 223-9.
  • 16. Chowdhary R, Mankani N, Chandraker NK. Awareness of dental implants as a treatment choice in urban Indian populations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 305-8.
  • 17. Tepper G, Haas R, Mailath G, et al. Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population. I. Level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 621-33.
  • 18. Ceyda ÖT, Zeynep ÖK, Kemal Ş. Patients’ knowledge and awareness of dental implants in a Turkish subpopulation. J Adv Prosthodont 2014; 6: 133-7
  • 19. Moghadam M, Dias R, Kuyinu E, Ferguson MB, Mucciolo T, Jahangiri L. “Pre-doctoral fixed implant patient satisfaction and challenges of a clinical implant competency.” J Dent Educ 2012: 76; 437-42.
  • 20. Al-Radha ASD. Impact of Anxiety on the Satisfaction of Dental Implant Patients. J Prosthodont 2017 Dec 14. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12729. [Epub ahead of print].

Explore and compare the knowledge, attitude, and acceptance of dental implant as a treatment option among sub-population of Saudi Arabia

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 241 - 248, 31.05.2019
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.517566

Öz

Objectives: Implant
therapy has gained wide popularity in the recent years. A complete information
on implant therapy should be provided to
patient by the dentist. The aim of present study is to evaluate the knowledge,
attitude, source of information and
acceptance of dental implants among the general population in the Southern region of Saudi Arabia.

Methods:
A total of 712 patients were randomly selected from the OPD of dental hospitals
across the southern region of Saudi
Arabia. The designed questionnaire comprised of 15 open-ended questions. Only Saudi national population was selected
for the survey. The questionnaire was divided into demographic data, knowledge,
attitude and participant’s acceptance towards implant therapy. The collected
data were statistically analyzed using the
Statistical Package for Social Sciences.

Results:
Out of 712 participants, 675 complete the survey. 59.1% were male and 41.9%
were females with an average age of 39.6
years old. All variables except for age
showed statistically significant
difference in the knowledge about implant among the study groups (p<0.05). The knowledge score was directly related to
education and professional status of the participants. Majority of the patients
(66%) with a history of implant therapy
were satisfied with the placed implant. 41% of the participants reported high
cost as a limiting factor for selecting an implant
treatment.







Conclusions: Population
from the southern region of Saudi Arabia
has moderate knowledge about dental
implant treatment. Dentists were found to be the most important source of
information to the patient. The major barrier for not selecting implant
treatment was the high cost of the
implant therapy.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Masters DH, Tatum H Jr. Dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 1210.
  • 2. Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 80-90.
  • 3. Berge TI. Public awareness, information sources, and evaluation of oral implant treatment in Norway. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000: 11; 401-8.
  • 4. Albrektsson, T, Zarb G, Worthington P. Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986: 1; 11–25.
  • 5. Nearby B, Bagewitz IC, Soderfeldt B. Factors explaining the desire for dental implant therapy: Analysis of the results from a longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24: 437-44.
  • 6. Nearby B, Kronström M, Söderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Changes in attitudes toward a desire for implant treatment: A longitudinal study of a middle-aged and older Swedish population. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 481-5.
  • 7. Grogono AL, Lancaster DM, Finger IM. Dental implants: a survey of patients’ attitudes. J Prosthet Dent 1989: 62; 573-6.
  • 8. Al-Hamdan K. Patients’ satisfaction with dental implants in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2007: 19; 6-11.
  • 9. Zimmer CM, Zimmer WM, William J, Liesener J. public awareness and acceptance of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 228-32.
  • 10. Al-Johany S, Al Zoman HA, Al Juhaini M, Al Refeai M. Dental patients’ awareness and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: A survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2010: 22; 183-8.
  • 11. Kohli S, Bhatia S, Kaur A, Rathakrishnan T. Public knowledge and acceptance of dental implant treatment in Malaysian Population. J Interdiscip Dent 2014: 4; 76-80.
  • 12. Salonen MA. Assessment of states of dentures and interest in implant-retained prosthetic treatment in 55-year-old edentulous Finns. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994; 22: 130-5.
  • 13. Best, H.A., 1993. Awareness and needs of dental implants by patients in New South Wales. Aust. Prosthodont. J. 7, 9–12.
  • 14. Guyatt GH, Cook DJ. Health status, quality of life, and the individual. JAMA 1994; 272: 630-1.
  • 15. Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, et al. Progress and trends in patients’ mindset on dental implants. I: Level of information, sources of information and the need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 223-9.
  • 16. Chowdhary R, Mankani N, Chandraker NK. Awareness of dental implants as a treatment choice in urban Indian populations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 305-8.
  • 17. Tepper G, Haas R, Mailath G, et al. Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population. I. Level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 621-33.
  • 18. Ceyda ÖT, Zeynep ÖK, Kemal Ş. Patients’ knowledge and awareness of dental implants in a Turkish subpopulation. J Adv Prosthodont 2014; 6: 133-7
  • 19. Moghadam M, Dias R, Kuyinu E, Ferguson MB, Mucciolo T, Jahangiri L. “Pre-doctoral fixed implant patient satisfaction and challenges of a clinical implant competency.” J Dent Educ 2012: 76; 437-42.
  • 20. Al-Radha ASD. Impact of Anxiety on the Satisfaction of Dental Implant Patients. J Prosthodont 2017 Dec 14. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12729. [Epub ahead of print].
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Research Articles
Yazarlar

Shahabe Saquib 0000-0002-5223-2167

Nabeeh Alqahtani 0000-0001-5064-7556

Ahmed Al-ahmari 0000-0002-4770-5281

Saad Alqahtani 0000-0003-4724-4021

Yunis Saleem Bhat 0000-0002-6931-9381

Muhammed Abid Khan

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Mayıs 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 25 Ocak 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Saquib S, Alqahtani N, Al-ahmari A, Alqahtani S, Bhat YS, Abid Khan M (01 Mayıs 2019) Explore and compare the knowledge, attitude, and acceptance of dental implant as a treatment option among sub-population of Saudi Arabia. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22 2 241–248.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.