Usage of Rotary Instruments in Root Canal Therapy of Deciduous Teeth - Review

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 351 - 357, 09.09.2019

İnci Kırmızıgül Pınar Demir

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.554999

Cited By: 2

Öz

Maintaining the deciduous teeth in the mouth until
the time of physiological exfoliation is of great importance for the health of
the permanent dentition. Root canal treatment, also called pulpectomy,
performed in cases of inflammation or necrosis of the deciduous teeth pulp, is
indicated as a successful method to preserve the tooth functionally. Conventional
pulpectomy procedure is performed with stainless steel files, however, the low
elasticity of these files may cause undesirable canal shapes and the
time-taking treatment period may lead to deterioration of the patient's
cooperation, especially in pedodontics. Ni-Ti rotary instrument systems
eliminate these disadvantages and provide better quality canal fillings in a
shorter duration. The present article reviewed the studies that are comparing
the traditional stainless steel files and Ni-Ti rotating instrument for the
root canal treatment of deciduous teeth.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Deciduous teeth, root canal treatment, stainless steel files, rotary instruments

Kaynakça

• 1. Brustolin JP, Mariath AA, Ardenghi TM, Casagrande L. Survival and factors associated with failure of pulpectomies performed in primary teeth by dental students. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(1):121-8.
• 2. Garip G, Nur BG, Altunsoy M, Ok E. Süt dişlerinde nikel titanyum döner aletlerinin kullanımının değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;25(2):249-57.
• 3. George S, Anandaraj S, Issac JS, John SA, Harris A. Rotary endodontics in primary teeth - a review. Saudi Dent J. 2016;28(1):12-7.
• 4. Katge F, Chimata VK, Poojari M, Shetty S, Rusawat B. Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time between rotary and manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(2):124-7.
• 5. Arıkan V, Akçay M, Zeren AE, Sarı Ş, Çelik BN. Süt dişi kök kanal tedavisinde Hero 642 Protaper Ni-Ti döner sistemler ve K tipi eğenin preparasyon güvenliği ve süresi açısından in-vitro olarak karşılaştırılması. AÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2010;37(2):89-96.
• 6. Asgary S, Fazlyab M. Endodontic management of an infected primary molar in a child with agenesis of the permanent premolar. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(1):119-22.
• 7. Kuo C, Wang Y, Chang H, Huang G, Lin C, Li U, Guo M. Application of Ni-Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars. J Dent. 2006;1(1):10.
• 8. Nagaratna PJ, Shashikiran ND, Subbareddy VV. In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006;24(4):186-91.
• 9. de Melo Ribeiro MV, Silva-Sousa YT, Versiani MA, Lamira A, Steier L, Pecora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of self-adjusting file and rotary systems in the apical third of oval-shaped canals. J Endod. 2013;39(3):398-401.
• 10. Ramezanali F, Afkhami F, Soleimani A, Kharrazifard MJ, Rafiee F. Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time in primary molars: Mtwo rotary instruments vs. hand K-files. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(4):240-3.
• 11. Ramazani N, Mohammadi A, Amirabadi F, Ramazani M, Ehsani F. In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(1):49-56.
• 12. Pinheiro SL, Araujo G, Bincelli I, Cunha R, Bueno C. Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars. Int Endod J. 2012;45(4):379-85.
• 13. Pinheiro SL, Silva JN, Goncalves RO, Villalpando KT. Manual and rotary instrumentation ability to reduce Enterococcus Faecalis associated with photodynamic therapy in deciduous molars. Braz Dent J. 2014;25(6):502-7.
• 14. Subramaniam P, Tabrez TA, Babu KL. Microbiological assessment of root canals following use of rotary and manual instruments in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;38(2):123-7.
• 15. Selvakumar H, Kavitha S, Thomas E, Anadhan V, Vijayakumar R. computed tomographic evaluation of K3 rotary and stainless steel K file instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(1):5-8.
• 16. Kaya E, Elbay M, Yigit D. Evaluation of the Self-Adjusting File system (SAF) for the instrumentation of primary molar root canals: a micro-computed tomographic study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017;18(2):105-10.
• 17. Canoglu H, Tekcicek MU, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Pediat Dent. 2006;28(6):518-23.
• 18. Musale PK, Mujawar SA. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(2):113-20.
• 19. Deshpande AN, Joshi NH, Naik KS. In vitro comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy and volumetric filling in primary molars: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8(1):33-7.
• 20. Katge F, Patil D, Poojari M, Pimpale J, Shitoot A, Rusawat B. Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(4):311-6.
• 21. Subramaniam P, Girish Babu KL, Tabrez TA. Effectiveness of rotary endodontic instruments on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):141-6.
• 22. Azar MR, Safi L, Nikaein A. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and ProTaper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth. Dental Res J (Isfahan). 2012;9(2):146-51.
• 23. Azar MR, Mokhtare M. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(2):363.
• 24. Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;32(4):295-8.
• 25. Zeren AE, Çelik BN, Arıkan V, Akçay M, Sarı Ş. Dört farklı döner alet sistemi ve K tipi eğe ile prepare edilen süt azı dişlerinde apikal mikrosızıntının in vitro olarak karşılaştırılması. AÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2012;39(1):7-15.
• 26. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(3):376-9.
• 27. Poornima P, Disha P, Nagaveni NB, Roopa KB, Bharath KP, Neena IE. Volumetric analysis of hand and rotary root canal instrumentation and filling in primary teeth using Spiral Computed Tomography - an invitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(3):193-8.
• 28. Makarem A, Ravandeh N, Ebrahimi M. Radiographic assessment and chair time of rotary instruments in the pulpectomy of primary second molar teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014;8(2):84-9.
• 29. Topçuoğlu G, Topçuoğlu HS, Akpek F. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(5):357-63.
• 30. Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S, Saygili G, Uysal B. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems in primary teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(11):864-8.
• 31. Singh A, Arunagiri D, Pushpa S, Sawhny A, Misra A, Khetan K. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: an ex vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(5):405-8.
• 32. Topcuoglu G, Topcuoglu HS, Delikan E, Aydinbelge M, Dogan S. Postoperative pain after root canal preparation with hand and rotary files in primary molar teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39(3):192-6.
• 33. Arıkan V, Akçay M, Zeren A, Sarı Ş. Comparison of A Ni-Ti rotary system (ProTaper) with K Files in primary tooth root canal preparation: an in vitro study. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2011;17(2):170.
• 34. Prabhakar AR, Yavagal C, Dixit K, Naik SV. Reciprocating vs rotary instrumentation in pediatric endodontics: cone beam computed tomographic analysis of deciduous root canals using two single-file systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(1):45-9.
• 35. Jeevanandan G. Kedo-S paediatric rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth - case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):3-5.
• 36. Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: a randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37(1):75-9.
• 37. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(1):77-8.