Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Usage Of Duckweeds Mixture For Treatment Of Leachate : II. COD, pH and EC

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1, 21 - 32, 29.04.2013

Öz

In this sudy, the mixture of duckweeds of Lemna gibba L., Lemna minor L., Spirodela polyrrhiza and Wolffia arrhiza was used for treatment of leachate and changes of COD, pH and Electrical Conductivity (EC) were investigated in the planted batch system. Experimental studies were maintained in 4 reactors at room temperature. The maximum COD removal efficiency was determined as 62.2% and 60.1% in the reactors with 5 cm and 10 cm depth, respectively. The pH with an initial value of 7.91 was between 7.91-8.49 at various hydraulic retention times. The electrical conductivity with an initial value of 5.59 mS/cm was reached to a maximum of 9.46 mS/cm.

Kaynakça

  • Nordin, N.I.A.B.A. (2006). Leachate Treatment Using Constructed Wetland with Magnetic Field, Master Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 88p.
  • Wojciechowska, E. and Obarska- Pempkowiak, H. (2008). Land fill Leachated Treatment at a Plot Plant Using Hydrophyte Systems. In: Pawlowska, M. and Pawlowski, L. (Ed), Management of Pollutants from Land fills and Sludge. Taylor and Francis, London, UK, 205-2
  • Lavrova, S. and Koumanova, B. (2010). Influence of recirculation in a lab-scale vertical flow constructed wetland on the treatment efficiency of land fill leachate, Bioresorce Technology, Vol. 101, 1756-1761.
  • Martin, C.D. andMoshiri, G.A. (1994). Nutrient reduction in an in-series constructed wetland system terating land fill leachate, Water Science Technology, Vol. 29, 267-272.
  • Bulc, T.,Vrhovsek, D. and Kukanja, V. (1997). The use of constructed wetland for land fill leachate treatment, Water Sci. Technol.,Vol. 35, 301-306.
  • Mathewson, C.C. and Mathewson, H.A. (1998). Designing a Wetland for a Wastewater Treatment-A Truly Interdisciplinary Effort., International Assciation for Engineering Geologyand the Environment, International Congress, Vol. 5, No.8, Vancouver.
  • Tchobanoglous, G. and Burton, F.L. (1991). Waste water Engineering Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1334p.
  • Polprasert, C., Kongsricharoern, N. and Kanjanaprarpin, W. (1994). Production of feed and fertiliser from water hyacinth plants in the tropics, Waste Management and Research, 3-11. Aalbers, H. (1999). Resource Recovery from Faecal Sludge Using Constructed Wetlands, A Survey of the Litrerature, UWEP Working Document, The Netherlands.
  • Topal, M., Karagözoğlu, B., Öbek, E. (2013). Sızıntı Suyunun Arıtımı İçin Su Mercimekleri Karışımının Kullanılması: I. Nutrientler, Cumhuriyet University Science Journal, Vol.34, No.1, 1-20.
  • AWWA, APHA and WPCF.(1989). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington.
  • Krishna, K.C.B. and Polprasert, C. (2008). An integrated kinetic model for organic and nutrient removal by dickweed-based waste water treatment (DUBWAT) system, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 34, 243-250.
  • Masbough, A., Frankowski, K., Hall, K.J. and Duff, S.J.B. (2005). The Effectiveness of Constructed Wetland for Treatment of Wood waste Leachate, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 25, 552-566.
  • Bulc, G.T. (2006). Longterm performance of a constructed wetland for land fill leachate treatment, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 26, 365-374.
  • Nivala, J.,Hoos, M.B., Cross, C., Wallace, S. and Parkin, G. (2007). Treatment of land fill leachate using an aerated, horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland, Sci. of theto. Env. Vol. 380, 19-27.
  • Chiemchaisri, C.,Chiemchaisri, J.J., Threedeach, S. and Wicranarachchi, P.N. (2009). Leachate treatment and green house gas emisssion in subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetland, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 100, 3808-3814.
  • Yalcuk, A. and Uğurlu, A. (2009). Comparison of horizontal and vertical constructed wetland systems for land fill leachate treatment, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 100, 252125
  • Sawaittayothin, V. and Polprasert, C. (2007). Nitrogen mass balance and microbial analysis of constructed wetlands treating municipal land fill leachate, BioresorceTechnology, Vol. 98, 565-570.
  • Woods, A. (1995). Constructed wetlands in water pollution control: fundamentals to their understanding, WaterSci. Technol. Vol. 32, 21-29.
  • Martinez Cruz, P., Hernandez Martinez, A., Soto Castor, R., Esquivel Herrera, A. and Rangel Levairo, J. (2006). Use of constructed wetlands for the treatment of water from an experimental channel at xochimilco, Mexico, Hidrobiologica, Vol. 16- 211-219.
  • Körner, S.,Das, S.K., Veenstra, S. and Vermatt, J.E. (2001). The effect of pH variation at the ammonium / ammonia equilibrium in waste water and its toxicity to Lemnagibba, Aquatic Botany, Vol. 71, 71-78.
  • Platzer, C. (1996). Enhanced Nitrogen Elimination in Subsurface Flow Artifical WetlandsA Multi Stage Concept., Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, Vienna, Austria, September 15-19, I/7-1-I/7-9.
  • Vermaat, J.E. and Hanif, M.K. (1998). Performance of common duckweed species (Lemnagibba) and the waterfern Azollafiliculoides on different tips of waste water, Wat. Res.,Vol. 32, 2569-2576.
  • El-Shafai, S.A., El-Gohary, F.A., Nasr, F.A., Van der Steen, N.P. and Gijzen, H.J. (2007). Nutrient recovery from domestic waste water using a UASB-duckweedpond system, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 98, 798-807.
  • Schulz, C.,Gelbrecht, J. and Rennert, B. (2003). Treatment of rainbow trout farm effluents in constructed wetland with emergend plants and subsurface horizontal waterflow, Aquaculture, Vol. 217, 207-221.

SIZINTI SUYUNUN ARITIMI İÇİN SU MERCİMEKLERİ KARIŞIMININ KULLANILMASI: II. DİĞER PARAMETRELER

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1, 21 - 32, 29.04.2013

Öz

Bu çalışmada, sızıntı suyu arıtımı için Lemna gibba L., Lemna minor L., Spirodela polyrrhiza ve Wolffia arrhiza’dan oluşan su mercimekleri karışımı kullanılmış ve bitkili kesikli sistemde KOİ, pH ve elektriksel iletkenlik değişimleri araştırılmıştır. Deneysel çalışmalar, 4 adet reaktörde oda sıcaklığında gerçekleştirilmiştir. En yüksek KOİ giderim verimi, 5 ve 10 cm derinlikteki reaktörlerde sırasıyla %62,2 ve %60,1 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Başlangıçta 7,91 değerinde olan pH, farklı hidrolik bekletme sürelerinde 7,91-8,49 arasında olmuştur. Başlangıçta 5,59 mS/cm değerinde olan elektriksel iletkenlik, en yüksek 9,46 mS/cm değerine ulaşmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Nordin, N.I.A.B.A. (2006). Leachate Treatment Using Constructed Wetland with Magnetic Field, Master Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 88p.
  • Wojciechowska, E. and Obarska- Pempkowiak, H. (2008). Land fill Leachated Treatment at a Plot Plant Using Hydrophyte Systems. In: Pawlowska, M. and Pawlowski, L. (Ed), Management of Pollutants from Land fills and Sludge. Taylor and Francis, London, UK, 205-2
  • Lavrova, S. and Koumanova, B. (2010). Influence of recirculation in a lab-scale vertical flow constructed wetland on the treatment efficiency of land fill leachate, Bioresorce Technology, Vol. 101, 1756-1761.
  • Martin, C.D. andMoshiri, G.A. (1994). Nutrient reduction in an in-series constructed wetland system terating land fill leachate, Water Science Technology, Vol. 29, 267-272.
  • Bulc, T.,Vrhovsek, D. and Kukanja, V. (1997). The use of constructed wetland for land fill leachate treatment, Water Sci. Technol.,Vol. 35, 301-306.
  • Mathewson, C.C. and Mathewson, H.A. (1998). Designing a Wetland for a Wastewater Treatment-A Truly Interdisciplinary Effort., International Assciation for Engineering Geologyand the Environment, International Congress, Vol. 5, No.8, Vancouver.
  • Tchobanoglous, G. and Burton, F.L. (1991). Waste water Engineering Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1334p.
  • Polprasert, C., Kongsricharoern, N. and Kanjanaprarpin, W. (1994). Production of feed and fertiliser from water hyacinth plants in the tropics, Waste Management and Research, 3-11. Aalbers, H. (1999). Resource Recovery from Faecal Sludge Using Constructed Wetlands, A Survey of the Litrerature, UWEP Working Document, The Netherlands.
  • Topal, M., Karagözoğlu, B., Öbek, E. (2013). Sızıntı Suyunun Arıtımı İçin Su Mercimekleri Karışımının Kullanılması: I. Nutrientler, Cumhuriyet University Science Journal, Vol.34, No.1, 1-20.
  • AWWA, APHA and WPCF.(1989). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington.
  • Krishna, K.C.B. and Polprasert, C. (2008). An integrated kinetic model for organic and nutrient removal by dickweed-based waste water treatment (DUBWAT) system, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 34, 243-250.
  • Masbough, A., Frankowski, K., Hall, K.J. and Duff, S.J.B. (2005). The Effectiveness of Constructed Wetland for Treatment of Wood waste Leachate, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 25, 552-566.
  • Bulc, G.T. (2006). Longterm performance of a constructed wetland for land fill leachate treatment, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 26, 365-374.
  • Nivala, J.,Hoos, M.B., Cross, C., Wallace, S. and Parkin, G. (2007). Treatment of land fill leachate using an aerated, horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland, Sci. of theto. Env. Vol. 380, 19-27.
  • Chiemchaisri, C.,Chiemchaisri, J.J., Threedeach, S. and Wicranarachchi, P.N. (2009). Leachate treatment and green house gas emisssion in subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetland, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 100, 3808-3814.
  • Yalcuk, A. and Uğurlu, A. (2009). Comparison of horizontal and vertical constructed wetland systems for land fill leachate treatment, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 100, 252125
  • Sawaittayothin, V. and Polprasert, C. (2007). Nitrogen mass balance and microbial analysis of constructed wetlands treating municipal land fill leachate, BioresorceTechnology, Vol. 98, 565-570.
  • Woods, A. (1995). Constructed wetlands in water pollution control: fundamentals to their understanding, WaterSci. Technol. Vol. 32, 21-29.
  • Martinez Cruz, P., Hernandez Martinez, A., Soto Castor, R., Esquivel Herrera, A. and Rangel Levairo, J. (2006). Use of constructed wetlands for the treatment of water from an experimental channel at xochimilco, Mexico, Hidrobiologica, Vol. 16- 211-219.
  • Körner, S.,Das, S.K., Veenstra, S. and Vermatt, J.E. (2001). The effect of pH variation at the ammonium / ammonia equilibrium in waste water and its toxicity to Lemnagibba, Aquatic Botany, Vol. 71, 71-78.
  • Platzer, C. (1996). Enhanced Nitrogen Elimination in Subsurface Flow Artifical WetlandsA Multi Stage Concept., Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, Vienna, Austria, September 15-19, I/7-1-I/7-9.
  • Vermaat, J.E. and Hanif, M.K. (1998). Performance of common duckweed species (Lemnagibba) and the waterfern Azollafiliculoides on different tips of waste water, Wat. Res.,Vol. 32, 2569-2576.
  • El-Shafai, S.A., El-Gohary, F.A., Nasr, F.A., Van der Steen, N.P. and Gijzen, H.J. (2007). Nutrient recovery from domestic waste water using a UASB-duckweedpond system, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 98, 798-807.
  • Schulz, C.,Gelbrecht, J. and Rennert, B. (2003). Treatment of rainbow trout farm effluents in constructed wetland with emergend plants and subsurface horizontal waterflow, Aquaculture, Vol. 217, 207-221.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Editöriyal
Yazarlar

Murat Topal

Bünyamin Karagözoğlu

Erdal Öbek

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Nisan 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Topal, M., Karagözoğlu, B., & Öbek, E. (2013). SIZINTI SUYUNUN ARITIMI İÇİN SU MERCİMEKLERİ KARIŞIMININ KULLANILMASI: II. DİĞER PARAMETRELER. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 34(1), 21-32.
AMA Topal M, Karagözoğlu B, Öbek E. SIZINTI SUYUNUN ARITIMI İÇİN SU MERCİMEKLERİ KARIŞIMININ KULLANILMASI: II. DİĞER PARAMETRELER. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. Nisan 2013;34(1):21-32.
Chicago Topal, Murat, Bünyamin Karagözoğlu, ve Erdal Öbek. “SIZINTI SUYUNUN ARITIMI İÇİN SU MERCİMEKLERİ KARIŞIMININ KULLANILMASI: II. DİĞER PARAMETRELER”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 34, sy. 1 (Nisan 2013): 21-32.
EndNote Topal M, Karagözoğlu B, Öbek E (01 Nisan 2013) SIZINTI SUYUNUN ARITIMI İÇİN SU MERCİMEKLERİ KARIŞIMININ KULLANILMASI: II. DİĞER PARAMETRELER. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 34 1 21–32.
IEEE M. Topal, B. Karagözoğlu, ve E. Öbek, “SIZINTI SUYUNUN ARITIMI İÇİN SU MERCİMEKLERİ KARIŞIMININ KULLANILMASI: II. DİĞER PARAMETRELER”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 34, sy. 1, ss. 21–32, 2013.
ISNAD Topal, Murat vd. “SIZINTI SUYUNUN ARITIMI İÇİN SU MERCİMEKLERİ KARIŞIMININ KULLANILMASI: II. DİĞER PARAMETRELER”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 34/1 (Nisan 2013), 21-32.
JAMA Topal M, Karagözoğlu B, Öbek E. SIZINTI SUYUNUN ARITIMI İÇİN SU MERCİMEKLERİ KARIŞIMININ KULLANILMASI: II. DİĞER PARAMETRELER. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2013;34:21–32.
MLA Topal, Murat vd. “SIZINTI SUYUNUN ARITIMI İÇİN SU MERCİMEKLERİ KARIŞIMININ KULLANILMASI: II. DİĞER PARAMETRELER”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 34, sy. 1, 2013, ss. 21-32.
Vancouver Topal M, Karagözoğlu B, Öbek E. SIZINTI SUYUNUN ARITIMI İÇİN SU MERCİMEKLERİ KARIŞIMININ KULLANILMASI: II. DİĞER PARAMETRELER. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2013;34(1):21-32.