BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2015, Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 1106 - 1113, 13.05.2015

Mahboobeh Joze Tajareh

Abstract

References

  • Celce-Murcia, M & Hawkins, B (1985). Contrastive Analysis, error analysis, and interlanguage analysis in M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Beyond basics: Issues and Research in TESOL (pp. 64-66). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Connor, U (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing, CUP
  • Di Pietro, J R (1971) Language Structures in Contrast, Newbury House, Rowley, Mass.
  • James C. (1980) Contrastive Analysis, Singapore, LongmanKachru Y, in Cook G and Seidlhofer B (eds) (1995), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics, OUP
  • Lado, R. (1957). Linguistic across cultures: Applied linguistic for language teachers. Ann
  • Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Odlin, T in Doughty C J and Long M H, (2003), The Handbook of second language Acquisition, Blackwell Keshavarz M H (1999), Contrastive
  • Analysis and Error Analysis, Rahnama Publications, Tehran Stockwell, R., J. Bowen, and J. Martin. (1965). The grammatical structure English and Spanish. Chicago: Chicago University Press
  • Swan M and Smith B (2001), Learner English, Cambridge University Press
  • Yamohammadi L, (2002), A Contrastive Analysis of Persian and English, Payame Nour Publications, Tehran
  • Ziahosseini S M, (1999), A contrastive Analysis of Persian and Error Analysis, Nashre Vira, Tehran
  • Ziahosseini S M, (2006), Questions and Answers on Contrastive Analysis and Error
  • Analysis, Rahnama Press, Tehran Wardhaugh, R. (1970). ‘The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis’. TESOL Quaterly.

An Overview of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis

Year 2015, Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 1106 - 1113, 13.05.2015

Mahboobeh Joze Tajareh

Abstract

Abstract. Contrastive analysis of hypothesis also called CA is the comparison of the linguistic system of two or more languages and it is based on the main difficulties in learning a new language that caused by interference from the first language. Teaching materials can make use of contrastive analysis and the difficulties between the two languages can predict by CA. This study is investigated that Theoretical foundations of CA. Contrastive analysis hypothesis is distinguished between two types: theoretical and applied CA and is investigated traditional versus Modern CA. CA offered some strong claims in the area of language teaching which are characterized as the contrastive analysis hypothesis that is discussed by this article, and strong versus weak and moderate are investigated too. CA cannot be overlooked in syllabus design and it is a valuable source of information for the purposes of translation and interpretation.

Keywords

contrastive analysis hypothesis applied Contrastive analysis; modern CA; Strong version; weak version

References

  • Celce-Murcia, M & Hawkins, B (1985). Contrastive Analysis, error analysis, and interlanguage analysis in M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Beyond basics: Issues and Research in TESOL (pp. 64-66). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Connor, U (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing, CUP
  • Di Pietro, J R (1971) Language Structures in Contrast, Newbury House, Rowley, Mass.
  • James C. (1980) Contrastive Analysis, Singapore, LongmanKachru Y, in Cook G and Seidlhofer B (eds) (1995), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics, OUP
  • Lado, R. (1957). Linguistic across cultures: Applied linguistic for language teachers. Ann
  • Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Odlin, T in Doughty C J and Long M H, (2003), The Handbook of second language Acquisition, Blackwell Keshavarz M H (1999), Contrastive
  • Analysis and Error Analysis, Rahnama Publications, Tehran Stockwell, R., J. Bowen, and J. Martin. (1965). The grammatical structure English and Spanish. Chicago: Chicago University Press
  • Swan M and Smith B (2001), Learner English, Cambridge University Press
  • Yamohammadi L, (2002), A Contrastive Analysis of Persian and English, Payame Nour Publications, Tehran
  • Ziahosseini S M, (1999), A contrastive Analysis of Persian and Error Analysis, Nashre Vira, Tehran
  • Ziahosseini S M, (2006), Questions and Answers on Contrastive Analysis and Error
  • Analysis, Rahnama Press, Tehran Wardhaugh, R. (1970). ‘The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis’. TESOL Quaterly.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Special
Authors

Mahboobeh Joze Tajareh

Publication Date May 13, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 36 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Joze Tajareh, M. (2015). An Overview of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(3), 1106-1113.
AMA Joze Tajareh M. An Overview of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. May 2015;36(3):1106-1113.
Chicago Joze Tajareh, Mahboobeh. “An Overview of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36, no. 3 (May 2015): 1106-13.
EndNote Joze Tajareh M (May 1, 2015) An Overview of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36 3 1106–1113.
IEEE M. Joze Tajareh, “An Overview of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1106–1113, 2015.
ISNAD Joze Tajareh, Mahboobeh. “An Overview of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36/3 (May 2015), 1106-1113.
JAMA Joze Tajareh M. An Overview of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;36:1106–1113.
MLA Joze Tajareh, Mahboobeh. “An Overview of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 36, no. 3, 2015, pp. 1106-13.
Vancouver Joze Tajareh M. An Overview of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;36(3):1106-13.