OONDescriptive and executive profile comparison in physical education lesson on public and non-public institutes from trainer and principals’ view

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3, 2752 - 2755, 13.05.2015

Mohammad Reza Anjomshoa Maryam Kiani Mohammad Atitork Safdar Soltani

Öz

Abstract. The object of this study is to compare descriptive and applicable profile of physical education lesson in public and un-public institutes from teachers and principals view in Mashhad city. Current study is descriptive one and has been done by measurement method. Statistical society includes all teachers of boy public and un-public schools in which among them we have selected 163 persons (91 teachers and 72 principals) randomly from success and semi-success district as research sample. We have used of principal and teachers special questionnaires in gathering information in which has been set by physical education management views. Questionnaire stability through testing study and cronbach alpha is 0.83, 0.91 for teachers and principals. Research findings analysis has been done by descriptive static and kolmogrove- smirnove test and k- skother by the aid of SPSS software and version 15 in meaningful level of (p<0.05).the result of study shows, there is no meaningful differences among teachers satisfaction of their job, using cooperative lesson design, sport community success in attracting talented students, physical education lesson evaluation based on official directive and the amount of physical education importance by principals in public and un-public schools. meaningful level is( (p>0.51), (p>0.01), (p>0.00), (p>0.036), (p>0.35), (p>0.53), respectively. in current study, meaningful level and the amount of using cooperative lesson design by physical education teachers in public schools is higher than un-public one but we have evaluated their success in attracting talented students to sport community, too. by looking other studies, it has been clear low level of physical educations’ educational level is mental disturbance of researchers and responsible. Current research findings showed the amount of teachers education in physical education in public schools is better than un public one.(75.9 % bachlor degree and higher) in this regard, education level and teachers expert and having sport space and facilities related are important factors in improving physical education lesson from principals view.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Physical education lesson, physical education teachers in public and un-public institutes

Kaynakça

• Banar, Noshin (2001) examining students’ object of activity in physical education class of high and guidance schools in Rasht, master degree thesis, Gilan university.
• Alam, shahram, (2001) examining influential factors in efficiency of physical education lesson from schools’ principals and teachers in elementary schools, high and guidance schools in Ahvaz, master degree thesis, Tehran center Islamic azad university.
• Gharekhani, hasan and et,al. (2008) examining stimulant and maintenance factors in physical activity teachers, movement science magazine and sport, number14, pages 151-161.
• Coustible, et, al. (2007) An immersion professional development program in environmental science for in-service elementary schools teachers. Journal of geosciences education, 55(2):72-79.
• Pecheone, Raymond l &chung ruth R (2006) evidence in teacher education:the performance assessment for California teacher(PACT):journal of teacher education, v(57), n0(1), pp:22- 36.
• Ramzani neghad, rahim and et,al. (2007) describing executing physical education lesson and sport in Irans’ high school. Research in sport science magazine. Number 23, page 13-30
• Mozaffari, amir ahmad and et,al. (2008) describing executing state of physical education lesson and sport in three levels of elementary schools in country from teachers and principals view, number23, page 13-30.
• Hemmatinezhad, ali and et,al. (2008) examining comparatively evaluation system of physical education teachers performance and none physical education one. Research in sport science magazine, number 23, page 31- 46.
• Ephtekhari, seyyed jabraeel (1998) considering and comparing facilities, budget and human resource of physical education in boy high schools in public and non public in Karaj city, master degree thesis, Isfahan university.
• Peirovy, farooji, abbas, (1996) examining the situation of physical education lesson in non public schools in Mashhad city, master degree thesis, Tehran university
• Kaldani moghaddam, mahdi (1996) examining and comparing physical education factors educating from principals and teachers’ view in public guidance school and non profit in Tehran. Master degree thesis, Tehran tarbiat Modarres University.
• Peimani zad and et,al. (1006) examining the problems of physical education lesson in khorasan province schools, expert study of physical education in khorasans’ education and training institute.
• Brien. Randy o. (2003)”effective motivational factors for Thai employee.” Faculty of business administration at Asian university of science and technology. 89, 111-126.
• Ma. Li, Qi. Shnanghog (2005),”customer satisfaction and service system based on motive- hygiene theory.” Social and Behacior sciences psychology. 45,289-304.