Arthur, P. Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding: People, Signs, and Architecture, Ontario: McGraw- Hill Ryerson Ltd. Reissued as a collector’s edition in 2002 by Focus Strategic Communications, Inc.
Allen, G. (1999) Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding: Bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior. In R. G.
Dellinger, B. (2010), Healing Environments. In C. Mc.Cullough (Ed.), Evidence Based Design for healthcare facilities (pp. 45-80), Indianapolis: Renee Wilmeth
Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 46–80). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Hunt, e, Waller, d. (1999). Orientation and wayfinding: a review. university of washington
Hsiung Chen, C, Chih Chang, W, Te Chang, W. (2009). Gender differences in relation to wayfinding strategies, navigational support design, and wayfinding task difficulty. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29: 220-226
Hund, A. M, Padgitt, A. J. (2010). Direction giving and following in the service of wayfinding in a complex indoor environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30: 553-564
Ho ِlscher, C,. Tenbrink, T,. & Wiener, J. M. (2011). Would you follow your own route description? Cognitive strategies in urban route planning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 121: 228-247
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Raubal, M. (2001) Human wayfinding in unfamiliar buildings: A simulation with a cognizing agent. Cognitive Processing, 2–3, 363–388
Rousek, J. B, Hallbeck, M. S. (2011). The use of simulated visual impairment to identify hospital design elements that contribute to wayfinding difficulties. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41: 447-458
Salmi, P. (2005), Wayfinding Design: Hidden Barriers to Universal Access, Implications (Where Research Informs Design), 5(8), 1-6
Tolman, E. C. (1948). COGNITIVE MAPS IN RATS AND MEN, The Psychological Review, 55(4), 189-208
Wiener, J.M, Büchner, S. J, Hölscher, C. (2009). Taxonomy of Human Wayfinding Tasks: A Knowledge-Based Approach. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 9:152–165
Wright. F.L. (2000).Brodacre city: Anew community plan, in: city Reader (Legate, R.T. and stout. F.Eds) Rutledge. London and New York.
Review on wayfinding performance by identification key factors influence
Year 2015,
Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 3949 - 3955, 13.05.2015
Abstract. An environment of understanding means that how to collect, store and process an information about the physical environment around us. Process and categories to recognize individuals successful in the environment and wayfinding, It is challenging. This article reviews the literature on important issues in wayfinding them; This article main theorists, Lynch, Kaplan and Pasini beginning stages of formation and development of wayfinding and analysis put forward their ideas and then wayfinding to the new research focuses on different issues. The main working paper focuses on the research, which was conducted by the library and the main study, explaining the concept of wayfinding, wayfinding strategy, wayfinding of different people, different individual, gender, age and cultural group different components and wayfinding components, and finally check the wayfinding conceptual models.
Arthur, P. Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding: People, Signs, and Architecture, Ontario: McGraw- Hill Ryerson Ltd. Reissued as a collector’s edition in 2002 by Focus Strategic Communications, Inc.
Allen, G. (1999) Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding: Bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior. In R. G.
Dellinger, B. (2010), Healing Environments. In C. Mc.Cullough (Ed.), Evidence Based Design for healthcare facilities (pp. 45-80), Indianapolis: Renee Wilmeth
Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 46–80). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Hunt, e, Waller, d. (1999). Orientation and wayfinding: a review. university of washington
Hsiung Chen, C, Chih Chang, W, Te Chang, W. (2009). Gender differences in relation to wayfinding strategies, navigational support design, and wayfinding task difficulty. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29: 220-226
Hund, A. M, Padgitt, A. J. (2010). Direction giving and following in the service of wayfinding in a complex indoor environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30: 553-564
Ho ِlscher, C,. Tenbrink, T,. & Wiener, J. M. (2011). Would you follow your own route description? Cognitive strategies in urban route planning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 121: 228-247
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Raubal, M. (2001) Human wayfinding in unfamiliar buildings: A simulation with a cognizing agent. Cognitive Processing, 2–3, 363–388
Rousek, J. B, Hallbeck, M. S. (2011). The use of simulated visual impairment to identify hospital design elements that contribute to wayfinding difficulties. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41: 447-458
Salmi, P. (2005), Wayfinding Design: Hidden Barriers to Universal Access, Implications (Where Research Informs Design), 5(8), 1-6
Tolman, E. C. (1948). COGNITIVE MAPS IN RATS AND MEN, The Psychological Review, 55(4), 189-208
Wiener, J.M, Büchner, S. J, Hölscher, C. (2009). Taxonomy of Human Wayfinding Tasks: A Knowledge-Based Approach. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 9:152–165
Wright. F.L. (2000).Brodacre city: Anew community plan, in: city Reader (Legate, R.T. and stout. F.Eds) Rutledge. London and New York.
Emamı, A., & Karımı, M. (2015). Review on wayfinding performance by identification key factors influence. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(3), 3949-3955.
AMA
Emamı A, Karımı M. Review on wayfinding performance by identification key factors influence. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. May 2015;36(3):3949-3955.
Chicago
Emamı, Ali, and Mahdie Karımı. “Review on Wayfinding Performance by Identification Key Factors Influence”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36, no. 3 (May 2015): 3949-55.
EndNote
Emamı A, Karımı M (May 1, 2015) Review on wayfinding performance by identification key factors influence. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36 3 3949–3955.
IEEE
A. Emamı and M. Karımı, “Review on wayfinding performance by identification key factors influence”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 3949–3955, 2015.
ISNAD
Emamı, Ali - Karımı, Mahdie. “Review on Wayfinding Performance by Identification Key Factors Influence”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36/3 (May 2015), 3949-3955.
JAMA
Emamı A, Karımı M. Review on wayfinding performance by identification key factors influence. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;36:3949–3955.
MLA
Emamı, Ali and Mahdie Karımı. “Review on Wayfinding Performance by Identification Key Factors Influence”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 36, no. 3, 2015, pp. 3949-55.
Vancouver
Emamı A, Karımı M. Review on wayfinding performance by identification key factors influence. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;36(3):3949-55.