Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Electric Bus Roof Frame Optimization With Different Materials and Thicknesses

Year 2025, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 63 - 70, 29.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.70395/cunas.1826764

Abstract

On electric bus ceilings; Because high-mass energy storage systems are also positioned on the ceiling compared to traditional internal combustion engine bus roofs, it significantly affects both static and dynamic loads in the ceiling area. The carrying capacity, rigidity and weight optimization of the profiles under the batteries with high mass are critical design parameters. In this study, the ceiling carcass structure of an electric bus was analyzed with a systematic approach using the finite element method under different thickness scenarios and different material configurations. The main purpose of the study is to obtain a design configuration that will provide the balance between structural strength and weight while providing weight optimization in the ceiling carcass and to quantitatively examine the mechanical behavior of profile structures made of different materials under the same boundary and loading conditions.
For this purpose, three different thickness scenarios were modeled. In Scenario-1, the main carrier body profiles and profiles carrying high-mass batteries are designed to be 3 mm thick and the other profiles are designed to be 2 mm thick and the maximum von Mises stresses are examined. In Scenario-2, it is the scenario where only the main carrier profiles are left at a thickness of 3 mm, and all remaining profiles are modeled as 2mm. In this scenario, it was observed that there was an increase in stress value, but the S460MC high-strength structural steel used was below the yield stress of 460 MPa; He states that the scenario has a significant potential in terms of weight optimization. In Scenario-3, it is the scenario where all profiles in the ceiling carcass have a wall thickness of 2 mm. In this scenario, it has been observed that stresses reach 200 MPa levels. Although it structurally showed a value below the yield limit, it was interpreted as a design close to the limit due to rigidity losses and potential fatigue risks.
In the second stage of the study, the safety coefficient of the structure was examined using high-strength S460MC steel and X2CrN12 materials in the ferritic stainless-steel class on this scenario, taking Scenario-3, which is the lightest configuration, as a reference. Considering the stresses of approximately 205 MPa for S460MC structural steel and the yield strength of the material, it has been observed that it has an average safety of 2.4 for the same limit and loading conditions, while it has been observed that it has an average of 1.4 times the safety for the same limit and loading conditions based on the stress of approximately 230 MPa in X2CrNi12 material. In this case, it can be stated that the X2CrNi12 material, which is in the ferritic stainless-steel class, offers less safety in lightness studies.

Ethical Statement

Not applicable

Supporting Institution

Sakarya University of Applied Sciences

References

  • [1] Arslan, T.A., & Solmaz, H. (2018). Design and Structural Analysis of an M3 Category Bus. International Conference on Tech-nology and Science, Antalya, 343–351.
  • [2] Budak, S. (2022). Deformation and Stress Analysis of a Connecting Rod Manufactured from Different Materials. European Journal of Science and Technology, (37), 12–16.
  • [3] Chen, Q., Zhao, Y., Wang, D., Chen, Z., Wang, Q., & Yuan, X. (2025). Multi-Level Matching Optimization Design of Thin-Walled Beam Cross-Section for Vehicle Frame Applications. Forests, 16(1), 69.
  • [4] Croccolo, D., De Agostinis, M., & Vincenzi, N. (2011). Structural Analysis of an Articulated Urban Bus Chassis via FEM: A Methodology Applied to a Case Study. Strojniški Vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 57(11), 799–809.
  • [5] Fu, C.L., Bai, Y.C., Lin, C., Wang, W.W., 2019. Design Optimization of a Newly Developed Aluminum-Steel Multi-Material Electric Bus Body Structure. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 60, 2177-2187.
  • [6] Gümüş, F., & Durmuş, A. (2025). Production of Bus Seat Brackets Using Composite Materials and Mechanical Analysis with the Finite Element Method. 21st International Istanbul Scientific Research Congress on Life, Engineering, Architecture, and Mathematical Sciences.
  • [7] Jung, Y., Lim, S., Kim, J., & Min, S. (2020). Lightweight Design of Electric Bus Roof Structure Using Multi-Material Topology Optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 61, 1273–1285.
  • [8] Karamert, S., & Demir, A. (2022). Topology Optimization Study on Commercial Bus Body Structure. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, 34(2), 229–234.
  • [9] Kongwat, S., Jongpradist, P., & Hasegawa, H. (2020). Lightweight Bus Body Design and Optimization for Rollover Crashwor-thiness. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 21, 981–991.
  • [10] Magnucki, K. (2002). Optimization of the Open Cross-Section of Thin-Walled Beams. Thin-Walled Structures.
  • [11] Özcan, A., & Yüce, C. (2024). Lightweighting of an M3 Class Electric Bus under Different Scenarios Using Finite Element Analysis. Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, 39(1), 9–22.
  • [12] Prosgolitis, C. G., et al. (2022). Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Plastically Pre-Strained HSLA Steels (S355MC and S460MC). Materials.
  • [13] Raj, A., Ahamed, S., Rajath, H.G., Byregowda, H.V., 2020. Structural Analysis of Bus Body Frame Using Fea for Static and Dynamic Analysis. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 7(8), pp. 2975-2979.
  • [14] Swiss Steel Group. (2023). X2CrNi12 (1.4003) Ferritic Stainless Steel – Technical Datasheet.
  • [15] Taban, E., et al. (2010). Laser and Plasma Welding Behaviour of Modified 12% Cr Ferritic Stainless Steels. Welding Journal.
  • [16] Thyssenkrupp. (2023). S460MC High-Strength Steel – Technical Datasheet.
  • [17] Wang, P., Bai, Y., Fu, C., & Lin, C. (2023). Lightweight Design of an Electric Bus Body Structure with Analytical Target Cas-cading. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering.
  • [18] Yang, Z. (2018). A Study on Finite Element Analysis of Electric Bus Frame for Lightweight Design. MATEC Web of Confer-ences.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Metals and Alloy Materials
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Gaye Zorlu 0009-0006-0246-0782

Can Haşimoğlu 0000-0002-5313-1229

Submission Date November 19, 2025
Acceptance Date December 9, 2025
Publication Date December 29, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Zorlu, G., & Haşimoğlu, C. (2025). Electric Bus Roof Frame Optimization With Different Materials and Thicknesses. Cukurova University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 4(2), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.70395/cunas.1826764
AMA 1.Zorlu G, Haşimoğlu C. Electric Bus Roof Frame Optimization With Different Materials and Thicknesses. CUNAS. 2025;4(2):63-70. doi:10.70395/cunas.1826764
Chicago Zorlu, Gaye, and Can Haşimoğlu. 2025. “Electric Bus Roof Frame Optimization With Different Materials and Thicknesses”. Cukurova University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 4 (2): 63-70. https://doi.org/10.70395/cunas.1826764.
EndNote Zorlu G, Haşimoğlu C (December 1, 2025) Electric Bus Roof Frame Optimization With Different Materials and Thicknesses. Cukurova University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 4 2 63–70.
IEEE [1]G. Zorlu and C. Haşimoğlu, “Electric Bus Roof Frame Optimization With Different Materials and Thicknesses”, CUNAS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 63–70, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.70395/cunas.1826764.
ISNAD Zorlu, Gaye - Haşimoğlu, Can. “Electric Bus Roof Frame Optimization With Different Materials and Thicknesses”. Cukurova University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 4/2 (December 1, 2025): 63-70. https://doi.org/10.70395/cunas.1826764.
JAMA 1.Zorlu G, Haşimoğlu C. Electric Bus Roof Frame Optimization With Different Materials and Thicknesses. CUNAS. 2025;4:63–70.
MLA Zorlu, Gaye, and Can Haşimoğlu. “Electric Bus Roof Frame Optimization With Different Materials and Thicknesses”. Cukurova University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, Dec. 2025, pp. 63-70, doi:10.70395/cunas.1826764.
Vancouver 1.Zorlu G, Haşimoğlu C. Electric Bus Roof Frame Optimization With Different Materials and Thicknesses. CUNAS [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 1;4(2):63-70. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA49UB65AJ