Genel Yetkinlik İnancı Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3, 93 - 104, 01.09.2008

Arş. Gör. Öner Çelikkaleli Yrd. Doç. Dr. Burhan Çapri

Öz

The purpose of this study is to make the validity and reliability studies of the General Self efficacy Scale GSES developed by Jerusalem and Schwarzer 1992 The data was collected from 753 university students According to results GSES revealed one factor which explained 45 78 of variance In criterion related validity study correlation between GSES and AÖKİYİÖ was found as 46 and item total correlation of the scale changed between 47 66 In the cross validation analysis obtained same result from all grups In reliability analysis the internal consistency was 87; item total correlations changed between 47 and 66 test retest reliability coefficients were found as 92 The findings of the study were discussed and interpreted based on related literature Key Words: Self efficacy general self efficacy validity reliability

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Genel Yetkinlik İnancı Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Jerusalem ve Schwarzer 1992 tarafından geliştirilen Genel Yetkinlik İnancı Ölçeği’nin GYİÖ geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarını yapmaktır Bu amaç ile eğitim fakültesinde okumakta olan toplam 753 üniversite öğrencisinden veri toplanmıştır Bulgulara göre GYİÖ tek boyuttan oluşmakta ve bu boyut varyansın 45 78 açıklamaktadır Ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik çalışmasında GYİÖ ile Aday Öğretmenin Kendine İlişkin Yeterlik İnancı Ölçeği arasındaki korelasyon 46; madde toplam test korelasyonlarının ise 47 ile 66 arasında değişmekte olduğu bulunmuştur Yapılan çapraz geçerleme çalışmasında ise tüm grup ve alt gruplardan benzer bulgular elde edilmiştir Ayrıca ölçeğin güvenirlik çalışmalarında ise ölçeğin iç tutarlık katsayısı 87 test tekrar test korelasyon katsayısı ise 92 olarak bulunmuştur Bulgular literatür ışında tartışılıp yorumlanmıştır Anahtar Kelimeler: Yetkinlik genel yetkinlik geçerlik güvenirlik

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yetkinlik, genel yetkinlik, geçerlik, güvenirlik

Kaynakça

• Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. ve Stair, R. M. (2000). Research report: the evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy–an empirical assessment. Information Systems Research 11(4), 418-430.
• Baer, J. S., Holt, C. S. ve Lichtenstein, E. (1986). Self-efficacy and smoking reexamined: Construct validity and clinical utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(6), 846-852.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
• Bandura, A. (1988). Perceived self-efficacy: Exercise of control through self-belief. In J. P. Dauwalder, M. Perrez, & V. Hobi (Eds.). Annual series of Europen research in behavior therapy (Vol. 2, pp. 27-59). Amsterdam/Lise: Swets & Zeitlenger.
• Bandura, A. (1997), Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
• Bandura, A.(1986). Social foundations of thought and actions, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V. ve Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy belief as shaper of children’s aspiration and career trajectories. Child Development, 72 (1), 187-206.
• Betz, N. E. ve Hackett, G. (1997). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the career assessment of women. Journal of Career Assessment, 5 (4), 383-402.
• Biran, M., ve Wilson, G. T. (1981). Treatment of phobic disorders using cognitive and exposure methods: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 (6), 886-899.
• Brown, B. L. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs and career development. ERIC Digest No. 205 (ED 429 187) [Online], 2 pages. http://ericacve.org/docs/dig205.pdf [2000, December 21].
• Choi, N. (2004). Sex role group differences in specific, academic, and general self- efficacy. The Journal of Psychology, 138 (2), 149–159.
• Çakır, Ö., Erkuş, A. ve Kılıç, F. (2004). Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi 1999- 2000 yılı öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi programının çeşitli değişkenler açısından değerlendirilmesi. MEÜ. Eğitim Fakültesi Ders Notu: 21, Mersin Üniversitesi Araştırma Fonu Destekli Proje.
• Eden, D. ve Kinnar, J.(1991). Modeling Galatea: boosting self-efficacy to increase volunteering, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (6), 770-780.
• Erci B. (2005). Genel Algılanan Öz-Yeterlilik Ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonu, 3.
• Uluslararası-10. Ulusal Hemşirelik Kongresi Özet Kitabı, İzmir.
• Grau, R., Salanova, M. ve Peiro, J. M (2001). Moderator effects of self-efficacy on occupational stress. Psychology in Spain, 5 (1), 63-74.
• Jerusalem, M. ve Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarder (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought Control of Action (pp. 195–213). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
• Johnson, R. ve Marakas, G. (2000). Research Report. The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition-toward refinement of the model, Information Systems Research, 11 (4), 402-417.
• Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U. ve Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139 (5), 439-457.
• Luszczynska. A., Gibbons. F. X., Piko, B. ve Tckozel. M. (2004). Self-regulatory cognitions, social comparison, perceived peers behaviors as predictors of nutrition and physical activity: A comparison among adolescents in Hungary. Poland, Turkey, and USA. Psychology and Health. 19. 577-593.
• Maddux, J. (Ed.) (1995). Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. New York: Plenum.
• Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y. ve Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.
• Pajares, F. ve Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in
• mathematical problem-solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (2), 193-203.
• Rimm, H, ve Jerusalem, M. (1999). Adaptation validation of an Estonian version of the General Self-Effıcacy Scale (Eses). Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 12 (3), 329-345.
• Schwarzer R, BaBler, J., Kwiatek P, Schroder K ve Zhang J. X. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the General Self-Efficacy scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46 (1), 69-88.
• Schwarzer R, ve Schroder K. E. E. (1997). Effects of self-efficacy and social support on postsurgical recovery of heart patients. Irish Journal of Psychology, 18, 88 103.
• Schwarzer, R. (1993). Measurement of perceived self-efficacy. Psychometric scales for cross-cultural research. Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin.
• Schwarzer, R. (1994). Optimism, vulnerability, and self-beliefs as health-related cognitions: A systematic overview. Psychology and Health: An International Journal, 9, 161-180.
• Schwarzer, R. ve Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, and M. Johnston, Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER- NELSON
• Schwarzer, R. ve Jerusalem, M. (Eds.) (1994). Gesellschaftlicher Umbruch als kritisches Lebensereignis [Macrosocial change as critical life event]. Weinheim, Germany: Juventa.
• Schwarzer, R. ve Scholz, U. (2000). Cross-cultural assessment of coping resources: The general perceived self-efficacy scale. Paper presented at the Asian Congress of Health Psychology Health Psychology and Culture, Tokyo, Japan, August 28-29.
• Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., ve Rogers, R. W. (1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671.
• Tipton, R. M., ve Worthington, E. (1984). The measurement of generalized self- efficacy: A study of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 545–548.
• Tong, Y. ve Song, S. (2004). Study on general self-effıcacy and subjectıve well-beıng of low ses college students ın a chınese unıversıty, College Student Journal, 38 (4), 637-644.
• Wang, C., ve Liu, Y. (2000). The relational study on general self-efficacy, trait anxiety, state anxiety, and test anxiety. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 8 (4), 229-230.
• Woodruff, S. L., ve Cashman, J. E. (1993). Task, domain, and general efficacy: A reexamination of the Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports, 72, 423–432.
• Zhang, J. X., ve Schwarzer, R. (1995). Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Chinese adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychologia, 38 (3), 174-181.