Loading [a11y]/accessibility-menu.js
Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Institutional Discourse or Institutionalisation of Discourse

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 10, 101 - 115, 25.03.2025

Öz

We see discourse is institutionalised in patient-doctor, student-teacher interactions, company meetings, workplaces, courtrooms, wedding ceremonies, customer representative meetings, political speeches, meetings of non-governmental organisations, public institutions and organisations, legal/illegal organisations. The language used in these environments where discourse is institutionalised carries a number of different interactional features from daily social conversations. Especially foreign linguists have made institutions or other organised structures the focus of discourse studies since 1960s. In Turkey, except for a few studies at the article level, not enough attention has been paid to the contexts in which discourse is institutionalised. In the studies that have been conducted, there is a blurring of the field and limitations of the concepts of institutional discourse and institutionalisation of discourse due to definitions of institution, institutional and institutionalisation. Institutional discourse and institutionalisation of discourse are not the same term. While institutional discourse emerges in institutions where discourse is institutionalised, the institutionalisation of discourse is not a feature unique to institutions.

Kaynakça

  • Agar, M. (1985). Institutional Discourse. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 5(3), 147-168.
  • Aktan, C. C., & Aktan, S. C. (2019). Organizasyonlar ve Kurumlar Kurallar ve Kurumların Rolü, Fonksiyonları ve Önemi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 65-82.
  • Bayır, M. (2018). Egemenlik ve Gözetimin Çağdaş Biçimleri: Total Kurum, Disiplinci İktidar ve Kamp. Nosyon: Uluslararası Toplum ve Kültür Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1, 46-61.
  • Breeze, R. (2013). Corporate Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Butko, O. (2023). Economic Discourse: Main Peculiarities in English and Spanish. Studia Philologica, (2), 35-45.
  • Donati, P. R. (1992). Political Discourse Analysis. Studying Collective Action, 136-167.
  • Doty, K. L. (2010). 20. Courtroom Discourse. Historical Pragmatics, 621.
  • Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings (3-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brødsgaard, K. E., & Rutten, K. (2017). From Accelerated Accumulation to Socialist Market Economy in China: Economic Discourse and Development from 1953 to the Present. Brill. China Studies Vol. 38.
  • Devran, Y. (2010). Haber-Söylem-İdeoloji. İstanbul: Başlık Yayım Grubu.
  • Drew, P. (2005). Conversation Analysis. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of Language And Social Interaction (71–102). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Drew, P., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2011). Dialogue in Institutional Interactions. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Second Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Duman, S. (2005). Aile Planlaması Danışmanlık Konuşmaları: Kurumsal Söylem Çözümlemesi. İstanbul: Simurg.
  • Ehrlich, S. (2010). Courtroom Discourse. The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistic. London: Sage. 361-375.
  • Elçioğlu, Ö., Duman, S., & Kırımlıoğlu, N. (2007). Bir Kurumu Temsil Eden Hekimin Kullandığı Dildeki Güç Unsurları. Türkiye Klinikleri Tıp Etiği Dergisi, 15(1), 19-29.
  • Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Ferrero, C. L., & Arias, C. G. (2014). Commercial Discourse. In The Routledge Handbook of Hispanic Applied Linguistics (512-530). London: Routledge.
  • Fonte, I., & Williamson, R. (2014). Media Discourse. In The Routledge Handbook of Hispanic Applied Linguistics (495-511). London: Routledge.
  • Freed, A. F. (2015). Institutional Discourse. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social İnteraction, 1-18.
  • Gür, T. (2013). Post-Modern Bir Araştırma Yöntemi Olarak Söylem Çözümlemesi. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks, 5(1), 185-202.Halkowski, T. (2011). Medical Discourse. Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, 321.
  • Hester, S., & Francis, D. (2001). Is Institutional Talk a Phenomenon? Reflections On Ethnomethodology and Applied Conversation Analysis. How To Analyze Talk In Institutional Settings, 206-218.
  • Holmes, J. (2015). Discourse in the Workplace. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 880-901.
  • Jaworska, S. (2020). Corporate Discourse. In: De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou-Nunes, A. (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Studies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kachmar, O. (2021). Economic Discourse as a Type of Institutional Discourse. Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ» 1, no. 11(79), 80–84.
  • Koester, A. (2006). Investigating Workplace Discourse. Routledge.
  • Komisyon (2011), Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara: TDK Yayınları.
  • López-Rocha, S., & Arévalo-Guerrero, E. (2014). Intercultural Communication Discourse. In The Routledge Handbook of Hispanic Applied Linguistics (531-550). Routledge.
  • Mautner, G. (2015). Corporate Discourse. In Ilie C. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (240 - 252). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Mayr, A. (2015). Institutional Discourse. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 755-774). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Oger, C., Ollivier-Yaniv, C. (2003). Analyse du discours institutionnel et sociologie compréhensive : vers une anthropologie des discours institutionnels. Mots. Les langages du politique, 71(1), 125-135.
  • O’Connor, C., & Snow, C. (2017). Classroom Discourse: What Do We Need To Know For Research and For Practice?. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Processes (315-342). Routledge.
  • Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and Institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635-652.
  • Popova, T. P. (2015). Characteristics Of Institutional Discourse. Historical And Socio-Educational Thought, 7(6-2), 295-300.
  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
  • Roberts, C. (2010). Institutional Discourse. In Maybin, J., & Swann, J. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to English Language Studies. London: Routledge.
  • Rymes, B. (2015). Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Tool For Critical Reflection. Routledge.
  • Stamatescu, C. R. (2022). Analysis of the Academic Institutional Discourse-Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Professional Communication and Translation Studies, (15), 51-54.
  • Ten Have, P. (2001). Applied Conversation Analysis. In McHoul, A., & Rapley, M. (Eds.). How to Analyze Talk In Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods, 3-11.
  • Thornborrow, J. (2014). Power Talk: Language And Interaction In Institutional Discourse. London: Routledge. Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11-52.
  • Wilce, J. M. (2009). Medical Discourse. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38(1), 199-215.
  • Wilson, J. (2015). Political Discourse. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 775-794.
  • Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods For Studying Action In Talk And Text. London: Sage.
  • Yıkmış, S. (2021). Türkiye Türkçesinde Empati Dili (Söylem Çözümlemesi). Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.

Kurumsal Söylem ya da Söylemin Kurumsallaşması

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 10, 101 - 115, 25.03.2025

Öz

Hasta- doktor, öğrenci-öğretmen etkileşimleri, şirket toplantıları, iş yerleri, mahkeme salonları, nikah merasimleri, müşteri temsilcisi görüşmeleri, siyasi konuşmalar, sivil toplum kuruluşlarının toplantıları, kamu kurum ve kuruluşları, legal ya da illegal örgütlerde söylemin kurumsallaştığını görmekteyiz. Söylemin kurumsallaştığı bu tür ortamlarda kullanılan dil, günlük sosyal konuşmalardan bir dizi farklı etkileşim özellikleri taşımaktadır. Özellikle yabancı dilbilimciler, 1960’lardan sonra kurum ya da diğer örgütlü yapıları, söylem çalışmalarının odağı haline getirmiştir. Ülkemizde ise makale düzeyinde yapılan birkaç çalışma dışında söylemin kurumsallaştığı bağlamlara henüz yeterince ilgi gösterilmemiştir. Yapılan çalışmalarda da kurum, kurumsal ve kurumsallaşma tanımlarından kaynaklı kurumsal söylem (institutional discourse) ve söylemin kurumsallaşması kavramlarının alanı ve sınırlılıkları hakkında bulanıklaşma söz konusudur. Halbuki kurumsal söylem (institutional discourse) ile söylemin kurumsallaşması aynı kavram değildir. Kurumsal söylem, söylemin kurumsallaştığı kurumlarda ortaya çıkarken, söylemin kurumsallaşması ise yalnızca kurumlara has bir özellik değildir.

Kaynakça

  • Agar, M. (1985). Institutional Discourse. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 5(3), 147-168.
  • Aktan, C. C., & Aktan, S. C. (2019). Organizasyonlar ve Kurumlar Kurallar ve Kurumların Rolü, Fonksiyonları ve Önemi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 65-82.
  • Bayır, M. (2018). Egemenlik ve Gözetimin Çağdaş Biçimleri: Total Kurum, Disiplinci İktidar ve Kamp. Nosyon: Uluslararası Toplum ve Kültür Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1, 46-61.
  • Breeze, R. (2013). Corporate Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Butko, O. (2023). Economic Discourse: Main Peculiarities in English and Spanish. Studia Philologica, (2), 35-45.
  • Donati, P. R. (1992). Political Discourse Analysis. Studying Collective Action, 136-167.
  • Doty, K. L. (2010). 20. Courtroom Discourse. Historical Pragmatics, 621.
  • Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings (3-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brødsgaard, K. E., & Rutten, K. (2017). From Accelerated Accumulation to Socialist Market Economy in China: Economic Discourse and Development from 1953 to the Present. Brill. China Studies Vol. 38.
  • Devran, Y. (2010). Haber-Söylem-İdeoloji. İstanbul: Başlık Yayım Grubu.
  • Drew, P. (2005). Conversation Analysis. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of Language And Social Interaction (71–102). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Drew, P., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2011). Dialogue in Institutional Interactions. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Second Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Duman, S. (2005). Aile Planlaması Danışmanlık Konuşmaları: Kurumsal Söylem Çözümlemesi. İstanbul: Simurg.
  • Ehrlich, S. (2010). Courtroom Discourse. The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistic. London: Sage. 361-375.
  • Elçioğlu, Ö., Duman, S., & Kırımlıoğlu, N. (2007). Bir Kurumu Temsil Eden Hekimin Kullandığı Dildeki Güç Unsurları. Türkiye Klinikleri Tıp Etiği Dergisi, 15(1), 19-29.
  • Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Ferrero, C. L., & Arias, C. G. (2014). Commercial Discourse. In The Routledge Handbook of Hispanic Applied Linguistics (512-530). London: Routledge.
  • Fonte, I., & Williamson, R. (2014). Media Discourse. In The Routledge Handbook of Hispanic Applied Linguistics (495-511). London: Routledge.
  • Freed, A. F. (2015). Institutional Discourse. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social İnteraction, 1-18.
  • Gür, T. (2013). Post-Modern Bir Araştırma Yöntemi Olarak Söylem Çözümlemesi. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks, 5(1), 185-202.Halkowski, T. (2011). Medical Discourse. Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, 321.
  • Hester, S., & Francis, D. (2001). Is Institutional Talk a Phenomenon? Reflections On Ethnomethodology and Applied Conversation Analysis. How To Analyze Talk In Institutional Settings, 206-218.
  • Holmes, J. (2015). Discourse in the Workplace. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 880-901.
  • Jaworska, S. (2020). Corporate Discourse. In: De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou-Nunes, A. (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Studies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kachmar, O. (2021). Economic Discourse as a Type of Institutional Discourse. Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ» 1, no. 11(79), 80–84.
  • Koester, A. (2006). Investigating Workplace Discourse. Routledge.
  • Komisyon (2011), Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara: TDK Yayınları.
  • López-Rocha, S., & Arévalo-Guerrero, E. (2014). Intercultural Communication Discourse. In The Routledge Handbook of Hispanic Applied Linguistics (531-550). Routledge.
  • Mautner, G. (2015). Corporate Discourse. In Ilie C. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (240 - 252). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Mayr, A. (2015). Institutional Discourse. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 755-774). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Oger, C., Ollivier-Yaniv, C. (2003). Analyse du discours institutionnel et sociologie compréhensive : vers une anthropologie des discours institutionnels. Mots. Les langages du politique, 71(1), 125-135.
  • O’Connor, C., & Snow, C. (2017). Classroom Discourse: What Do We Need To Know For Research and For Practice?. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Processes (315-342). Routledge.
  • Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and Institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635-652.
  • Popova, T. P. (2015). Characteristics Of Institutional Discourse. Historical And Socio-Educational Thought, 7(6-2), 295-300.
  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
  • Roberts, C. (2010). Institutional Discourse. In Maybin, J., & Swann, J. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to English Language Studies. London: Routledge.
  • Rymes, B. (2015). Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Tool For Critical Reflection. Routledge.
  • Stamatescu, C. R. (2022). Analysis of the Academic Institutional Discourse-Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Professional Communication and Translation Studies, (15), 51-54.
  • Ten Have, P. (2001). Applied Conversation Analysis. In McHoul, A., & Rapley, M. (Eds.). How to Analyze Talk In Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods, 3-11.
  • Thornborrow, J. (2014). Power Talk: Language And Interaction In Institutional Discourse. London: Routledge. Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11-52.
  • Wilce, J. M. (2009). Medical Discourse. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38(1), 199-215.
  • Wilson, J. (2015). Political Discourse. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 775-794.
  • Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods For Studying Action In Talk And Text. London: Sage.
  • Yıkmış, S. (2021). Türkiye Türkçesinde Empati Dili (Söylem Çözümlemesi). Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
Toplam 43 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Söylem ve Bağlamsal Dilbilim
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ahmet Basatemür 0000-0002-5438-8181

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 22 Mart 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Mart 2025
Kabul Tarihi 12 Mart 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 10

Kaynak Göster

APA Basatemür, A. (2025). Kurumsal Söylem ya da Söylemin Kurumsallaşması. Disiplinler Arası Dil Araştırmaları, 10(10), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.48147/dada.1653589