EN
Assessment of intern doctors' attitudes towards ageism and related factors: A single-center cross-sectional study
Abstract
BACKGROUND
It is well known that ageism, or discrimination against older individuals, is a pervasive issue in healthcare settings, potentially affecting the quality of care provided to this population. In this paper, it was aimed to assess the attitudes of intern doctors toward ageism and to identify the sociodemographic, educational, and experiential factors influencing these attitudes.
MATERIAL and METHODS
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 158 intern doctors at Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine during the 2024–2025 academic year. Data were collected utilizing the Sociodemographic Information Form and the Turkish version of the UCLA Geriatrics Attitudes Scale (UCLA-GA). Multiple linear regression analyses were executed to identify factors associated with UCLA-GA scores.
RESULTS
The mean total UCLA-GA score of participants was 47.5 ± 4.6, indicating generally positive attitudes toward geriatrics. Intern doctors who expressed a preference to live with their parents in the future showed significantly higher total UCLA-GA scores (β = 1.793, 95% CI: 0.198–3.388, p = 0.028). Additionally, willingness to work in institutions providing elder care services was significantly associated with higher scores in the Medical Care (β = 1.078, 95% CI: 0.255–1.900, p = 0.011) and Resource Distribution (β = 1.057, 95% CI: 0.241–1.873, p = 0.011) subscales. Notably, aging was predominantly associated with negative themes such as illness, dependency, and death.
CONCLUSIONS
As a result, intern doctors indicated generally positive attitudes toward ageism. Those who preferred to live with their parents in the future exhibited more favorable perceptions of aging, while willingness to work in elder care institutions was associated with higher scores of medical care and resource distribution subscales. Despite these positive perspectives, aging remains largely perceived through negative lenses, such as illness, dependency, and mortality, emphasizing the need for targeted educational interventions to foster a more balanced and nuanced understanding of aging among future healthcare professionals.
Keywords
References
- 1. Dahlke S. Addressing ageism in healthcare through gerontological nursing. Open Access Government (2024) 41:42–43. doi: 10.56367/OAG-041-11229
- 2. Wyman MF, Shiovitz-Ezra S, Bengel J. Ageism in the Health Care System: Providers, Patients, and Systems. In: Ayalon L, Tesch-Römer C, editors. International Perspectives on Aging. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2018). p. 193–212 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_13
- 3. Simsek H, Bahadir H, Bi̇lgi̇n A. Physicians’ Attitudes Towards The Elderly: Ageism in a University Hospital in Turkey. Turkısh Journal Of Gerıatrics-Turk Gerıatri Dergisi (2019) 22: doi: 10.31086/tjgeri.2019150579
- 4. Altun A, Demirel B. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Yaşlı Ayrımcılığıyla İlgili Tutumları: Keskin MYO Örneği. MJSS (2020) 9:423–434. doi: 10.33206/mjss.679054
- 5. Rudnicka E, Napierała P, Podfigurna A, Męczekalski B, Smolarczyk R, Grymowicz M. The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing. Maturitas (2020) 139:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.018
- 6. Koçak K, Keskin Şimşek H. The Identification of High School Students’ Attitudes Towards Ageism and Related Factors. JBACHS (2024) 8:423–432. doi: 10.30621/jbachs.1374685
- 7. Ben-Harush A, Shiovitz-Ezra S, Doron I, Alon S, Leibovitz A, Golander H, Haron Y, Ayalon L. Ageism among physicians, nurses, and social workers: findings from a qualitative study. Eur J Ageing (2017) 14:39–48. doi: 10.1007/s10433-016-0389-9
- 8. Nemiroff L. We can do better: Addressing ageism against older adults in healthcare. Healthc Manage Forum (2022) 35:118–122. doi: 10.1177/08404704221080882
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Rural Clinical Health
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
July 25, 2025
Submission Date
January 28, 2025
Acceptance Date
February 24, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 39 Number: 3
APA
Arayıcı, M. E. (2025). Assessment of intern doctors’ attitudes towards ageism and related factors: A single-center cross-sectional study. Developments and Experiments in Health and Medicine, 39(3), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.18614/dehm.1751123
AMA
1.Arayıcı ME. Assessment of intern doctors’ attitudes towards ageism and related factors: A single-center cross-sectional study. Dev Exp Health Med. 2025;39(3):165-178. doi:10.18614/dehm.1751123
Chicago
Arayıcı, Mehmet Emin. 2025. “Assessment of Intern Doctors’ Attitudes towards Ageism and Related Factors: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study”. Developments and Experiments in Health and Medicine 39 (3): 165-78. https://doi.org/10.18614/dehm.1751123.
EndNote
Arayıcı ME (July 1, 2025) Assessment of intern doctors’ attitudes towards ageism and related factors: A single-center cross-sectional study. Developments and Experiments in Health and Medicine 39 3 165–178.
IEEE
[1]M. E. Arayıcı, “Assessment of intern doctors’ attitudes towards ageism and related factors: A single-center cross-sectional study”, Dev Exp Health Med, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 165–178, July 2025, doi: 10.18614/dehm.1751123.
ISNAD
Arayıcı, Mehmet Emin. “Assessment of Intern Doctors’ Attitudes towards Ageism and Related Factors: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study”. Developments and Experiments in Health and Medicine 39/3 (July 1, 2025): 165-178. https://doi.org/10.18614/dehm.1751123.
JAMA
1.Arayıcı ME. Assessment of intern doctors’ attitudes towards ageism and related factors: A single-center cross-sectional study. Dev Exp Health Med. 2025;39:165–178.
MLA
Arayıcı, Mehmet Emin. “Assessment of Intern Doctors’ Attitudes towards Ageism and Related Factors: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study”. Developments and Experiments in Health and Medicine, vol. 39, no. 3, July 2025, pp. 165-78, doi:10.18614/dehm.1751123.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Emin Arayıcı. Assessment of intern doctors’ attitudes towards ageism and related factors: A single-center cross-sectional study. Dev Exp Health Med. 2025 Jul. 1;39(3):165-78. doi:10.18614/dehm.1751123