Coffee Solution Effect on Color Differences of Resin Matrix Ceramics

Yıl 2023, , 98 - 105, 29.08.2023

Elif Çelik , Ahmet Serkan Küçükekenci

https://doi.org/10.21306/dishekimligi.1222917

Öz

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effect of soaking in coffee solution on color differences after two polishing processes are applied to three different CAD/CAM ceramics with currently used resin matrix content.
Materials and Methods: A total of 60 samples (1.5 mm ± 0.01 thickness) of three different resin matrix CAD/CAM blocks [polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network (VE, VITA Enamic), nanoparticle-filled ceramic (LU, Lava Ultimate), composite resin nano-ceramic (CE, Cerasmart)] were prepared (n=20). The prepared samples were divided into two subgroups according to the polishing process (n=10); While polishing rubber was applied to one group (D, Diapol Twist), polishing discs were applied to the other group (S, Sof-Lex Disc). The color values of the samples before (L0, a0, b0) and after soaking in the coffee solution (L1, a1, b1) were recorded in the CIE Lab color system with a spectrophotometer device (Vita EasyShade). Color differences were calculated with the formula CIEDE2000 (ΔE00). Then, the values were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests.
Results: As a result of the two-way analysis of variance, it was obtained that only the ceramic type effect significantly on the color differences (p<0.001). Although the samples polished with Sof-Lex discs in all ceramics showed less color difference than the Diapol Twist polishing rubber, there was no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05). Each group showed a clinically unacceptable color differences value (ΔE00> 1.8). Statistically, the lowest color differences were obtained in the VE ceramics (p<0.05). The statistically higher color differences were observed in the CS ceramic groups than in other ceramics (p<0.05) except the LU_D group (p>0.05).
Conclusion: After soaking in a coffee solution, the color of CS ceramic was more affected than other resin matrix ceramics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polishing, Color Stability, Resin Matrix.

Kahve Solüsyonunun Rezin Matriks Seramiklerin Renk Değişimine Etkisi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; güncel olarak kullanılan üç farklı rezin matriks içerikli CAD/CAM seramiğe iki farklı polisaj işlemi uygulandıktan sonra kahve solüsyonda bekletmenin renk değişimine olan etkisini incelemektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Üç farklı rezin matriks CAD/CAM bloktan [Polimer-infiltre ağ yapılı seramik (VE, VITA Enamic), Rezin nanoseramik (LU, Lava Ultimate), Nanopartikülle doldurulmuş nanoseramik (CE, Cerasmart)] toplam 60 örnek (1.5 mm ±0.01 kalınlıkta) hazırlandı (n=20). Hazırlanan örnekler polisaj işlemine göre iki alt gruba ayrıldı (n=10). Birinci gruba polisaj lastiği uygulanırken (D, Diapol Twist) diğer gruba polisaj diskleri uygulandı (S, Sof-Lex Disc). Örneklerin kahve solüsyonunda bekletmeden önceki (L0, a0, b0) ve beklettikten sonraki renk değerleri (L1, a1, b1) spektrofotometre cihazı (Vita EasyShade) ile CIE Lab renk sisteminde kaydedildi. Renk farklılıkları CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) formülü ile hesaplandı. Elde edilen değerler iki yönlü varyans (ANOVA) ve Tukey’s çoklu karşılaştırma testleri ile analiz edildi.
Bulgular: İki yönlü varyans analizi sonucu sadece seramik tipinin renk değişikliği üzerine anlamlı farklılıklar oluşturduğu görüldü (p<0.001). Tüm seramiklerde Sof-Lex diskler ile polisaj işlemi yapılan örnekler Diapol Twist polisaj lastiği uygulanan örneklere göre daha az renk değişimi göstermesine rağmen aralarında istatistiksel olarak fark görülmemiştir (p>0.05). Bütün gruplarda klinik olarak kabul edilebilir değerin üzerinde renk değişikliği oluştuğu görüldü (ΔE00>1.8). İstatistiksel olarak en az renk değişikliği VE gruplarında görüldü (p<0.05). CS seramik örneklere ait gruplarda diğer gruplara göre istatistiksel olarak daha fazla renk değişikliği görülmesine rağmen (p<0.05), LU_D grubu ile arasında istatistiksel olarak fark görülmedi (p>0.05).
Sonuç: CS seramik kahve solüsyonunda bekletilmesi sonucu diğer rezin matriks seramiklere göre daha fazla renk değişimine uğramıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Parlatma, Renk Stabilitesi, Rezin matriks

Kaynakça

• 1. Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hammerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J. 2012; 31:377-83.
• 2. Hatrick CD, Eakle WS. Dental materials clinical applications for dental assistants and dental hygienists. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2016. p. 53
• 3. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28(3):227-35.
• 4. Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater. 2012; 28(5):529-34.
• 5. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114(4):587-93.
• 6. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115(1):71–5.
• 7. de Oliveira AL, Botta AC, Campos JA, Garcia PP. Effects of immersion media and repolishing on color stability and superficial morphology of nanofilled composite resin. Microsc Microanal. 2014; 20:1234-39.
• 8. Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resinbased composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135:587-94.
• 9. Fontes ST, Fernandez MR, de Moura CM, Meireles SS. Color stability of a nanofill composite: effect of different immersion media. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17:388-91.
• 10. Arocha MA, Basilio J, Llopis J, Di Bella E, Roig M, Ardu S. Colour stainability of indirect CAD-CAM processed composites vs. conventionally laboratory processed composites after immersion in staining solutions. J Dent. 2014; 42:831-38.
• 11. Samra AP, Pereira SK, Delgado LC, Borges CP. Color stability evaluation of aesthetic restorative materials. Braz Oral Res. 2008; 22:205-10.
• 12. Motro PF, Kursoglu P, Kazazoglu E. Effects of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 108:231-37.
• 13. Anusavice KJ, Kakar K, Ferree N. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18:218–23.
• 14. Aksoy, G. Effect of various treatment and glazing (coating) techniques on the roughness and wettability of ceramic dental restorative surfaces. Colloids and surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2006; 53(2):254-59.
• 15. Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF. Surface evaluation of polishing techniques for new resilient CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016; 28:56–66.
• 16. Shetty R, Shenoy K, Dandekeri S, Suhaim KS, Ragher M, Francis J. Resin-matrix ceramics – an overview. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2015; 6(11):7414-17.
• 17. Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, Giannini M. Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finishing and polishing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23:34-43.
• 18. İlday NÖ, Erdem V, Bayındır YZ. Farklı bitirme ve parlatma işlemlerinin üç farklı rezin materyalin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkisi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2008; 18:19-24.
• 19. Sarıkaya I, Yerliyurt K, Hayran Y: Effect of surface finishing on the colour stability and translucency of dental ceramics. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18(1):1-8.
• 20. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M.Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27:1-9
• 21. Ghinea R, Perez MM, Herrera LJ, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent. 2010; 38:57-64.
• 22. Johnston W, Kao E. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res. 1989; 68:819-22.
• 23. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010; 38:2-16.
• 24. Ðozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A. Performance of five commercially available tooth color measuring devices. J Prosthodont. 2007; 16:93-100.
• 25. Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101:193-99.
• 26. Mansour CH, Kheiralla LS, Ghanem LA. Color stability and surface roughness of CAD/CAM ceramill composite and cerasmart endocrowns. J Dent Med Sci. 2018; 17:13-24.
• 27. Arif R, Yilmaz B, Johnston WM. In vitro color stainability and relative translucency of CAD-CAM restorative materials used for laminate veneers and complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 122:160-66.
• 28. Quek SHQ, Yap AUJ, Rosa V. Effect of staining beverages on color and translucency of CAD/CAM composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018; 30:9-17.
• 29. Mainjot A, Dupont N, Oudkerk J, Dewael T, Sadoun M. From Artisanal to CAD- CAM Blocks State of the Art of Indirect Composites. J Dent Res. 2016; 95:487-95.
• 30. Koizumi H, Saiki O, Nogawa H, Hiraba H, Okazaki T,Matsumura H. Surface roughness and gloss of current CAD/CAM resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34:881-87.
• 31. Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, Subbarao CV. Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins—an in vitro study. J Dent. 2010;38:137-42.
• 32. Ardu S, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Feilzer AJ, Di Bella E, Dietschi D. Influence of water sorption on resin composite color and color variation amongst various composite brands with identical shade code: an in vitro evaluation. J Dent. 2011;39:37-44.
• 33. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137:22-31.
• 34. Al-Wahadni A. Glazing MMD. Finishing dental porcelain: a literature review. J Can Dent Assoc. 1998; 64:580-83.
• 35. Raimondo RL, Richardson JT, Wiedner B. Polished versus autoglazed dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64:553-57.
• 36. Goldstein GR, Barnhard BR, Penugonda B. Profilometer, SEM, and visual assessment of porcelain polishing methods. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 65:627-34.
• 37. Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin N Am. 2007; 51:380-81.
• 38. Kursoglu P, Karagoz Motro PF, Kazazoglu E. Correlation of surface texture with the stainability of ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(2):306-13.