Measuring Resident Experience Level in an in-vitro Organic Tendon Repair Model
Abstract
Aim: Tendon injuries remain challenging to treat, and successful outcomes depend on surgical precision and experience. Simulation-based models are widely used to develop these skills. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of surgical experience on tendon repair quality using an in vitro chicken tendon model, focusing on tensile strength and repair time.
Material and Methods: The third deep flexors of 60 adult chicken feet were used in this study. Residents were divided into three groups by experience level as novice (Group A), intermediate (Group B), and experienced (Group C), with two residents per group. Each repaired approximately 10 chicken deep flexor tendons using a standardized technique. Repairs exceeding a 5-mm suture boundary or showing excessive bulk were excluded and repeated. Repair duration and ultimate tensile force (N) were recorded. Groups were compared to evaluate the effect of residents’ experience on operative time and tendon repair strength.
Results: Experienced residents achieved significantly higher tensile strength (34.55±6.51 N) compared to intermediate (24.65±6.53 N) and novice (14.91±4.50 N) groups (p<0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences for all groups. Repair time showed a non-significant trend toward shorter duration with 324.75±80.42 s in the experienced group compared to the 385.50±108.41 s in Group A, 370.75±69.38 s in Group B (p=0.082).
Conclusion: Surgical experience was associated with significantly higher tendon repair strength, and repair time also showed a trend favoring experienced residents. The chicken tendon model provides a low-cost, accessible tool for objective training and assessment.
Keywords
References
- Western LF, Roberts PG, Rees J, Howgate D. Construct validation of a novel synthetic tendon model used for assessing surgeon performance in a simulated core suture tendon repair technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;92:111-7. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.057.
- Vinnicombe Z, Asher CM, Super J, Bystrzonowski N, Katsarma E. A qualitative study of seven simulation models for tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021;46(8):847-51. doi:10.1177/1753193421994470.
- Kuronen JAE, Riski B, Leppänen OV, Karjalainen T, Linnanmäki L. The learning curves of adelaide- and gan-modified lim-tsai flexor tendon repair techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 2025;50(1):34-42. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.09.004.
- Western L, Roberts PG, Rees J, Howgate D. Validation of a novel simulated tendon model for core suture tendon repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025;107(5):364-368. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2024.0064.
- Ingraham JM, Weber RA 3rd, Weber RA. Utilizing a simulated tendon to teach tendon repair technique. Hand (N Y). 2009;4(2):150-5. doi:10.1007/s11552-009-9184-9.
- Lin GT, An KN, Amadio PC, Cooney WP 3rd. Biomechanical studies of running suture for flexor tendon repair in dogs. J Hand Surg Am. 1988;13(4):553-8. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(88)80094-7.
- Taras JS, Raphael JS, Marczyk SC, Bauerle WB. Evaluation of suture caliber in flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(6):1100-4. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2001.28946.
- Çolak Ö, Kankaya Y, Sungur N, Özer K, Gürsoy K, Şerbetçi K, et al. Barbed sutures versus conventional tenorrhaphy in flexor tendon repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis. Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(3):228-34. doi:10.5999/aps.2018.00962.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Hand Surgery, Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Ümit Ozan Özlen
0009-0007-1158-0193
Türkiye
Berkalp Berker
0009-0003-9161-324X
Türkiye
Ömer Yiğitalp
0009-0001-2467-7302
Türkiye
Eylem Suveren
0000-0003-1730-6463
Türkiye
Metin Görgü
0000-0001-9077-2976
Türkiye
Publication Date
April 25, 2026
Submission Date
October 23, 2025
Acceptance Date
March 28, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 28 Number: 1
