Comparison of Three Different Treatment Modalities in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Corticosteroid Injection, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Radiofrequency Nerve Ablation
Abstract
Aim: In this study, it was aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of three popular conservative treatment options in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis (PF): corticosteroid injection (CSI), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and radiofrequency nerve ablation (RFNA).
Material and Methods: Patients with chronic PF refractory to other conservative treatment methods were included in this retrospective study. From January 2017 to February 2019, all the patients with the diagnosis of chronic PF who were treated with conservative treatment modalities were evaluated. Forty eight patients who met our eligibility criteria and treated either with CSI, ESWT or RFNA methods were included in the study. Clinical and functional assessments of the patients were done by American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scoring system and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) just before the treatment, at 6th and at 12th weeks of the last session.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference in terms of VAS scores between the groups both for before treatment and for 6th week (both p<0.001), but there was not a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VAS scores at 12th week (p=0.436). Also, there was not a statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of AOFAS scores before treatment, 6th and 12th week assessments (p=0.076, p=0.081, p=0.478 respectively).
Conclusion: Although the three treatment modalities showed significant improvements in the chronic PF treatment, no differences were found among effectiveness of them at the final follow-up period.
Keywords
References
- Riddle DL, Schappert SM. Volume of ambulatory care visits and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis: a national study of medical doctors. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(5):303-10.
- Schwartz EN, Su J. Plantar fasciitis: a concise review. Perm J. 2014;18(1):e105-7.
- Böddeker R, Schäfer H, Haake M. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of plantar fasciitis-a biometrical review. Clin Rheumatol. 2001;20(5):324-30.
- Thomas JL, Christensen JC, Kravitz SR, Mendicino RW, Schuberth JM, Vanore JV, et al. The diagnosis and treatment of heel pain: a clinical practice guideline-revision 2010. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49(3 Suppl):S1-19.
- Ang TW. The effectiveness of corticosteroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Singapore Med J. 2015;56(8):423-32.
- Crawford F, Atkins D, Young P, Edwards J. Steroid injection for heel pain: evidence of short-term effectiveness. A randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38(10):974-7.
- Roos E, Engström M, Söderberg B. Foot orthoses for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(8):606-11.
- Kalaci A, Cakici H, Hapa O, Yanat AN, Dogramaci Y, Sevinç TT. Treatment of plantar fasciitis using four different local injection modalities: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009;99(2):108-13.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Clinical Sciences
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
August 30, 2019
Submission Date
May 31, 2019
Acceptance Date
August 7, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 21 Number: 2
Cited By
A Multi-centered Retrospective Study on the Efficacy of Pulsed Radiofrequency Nerve Ablation in the Treatment of Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Mid-term Outcome
Cureus
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.58021Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, compared to corticosteroid injections, on pain, plantar fascia thickness and foot function in patients with plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Rehabilitation
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241253779Comparison of the Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation and Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis
Cukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1708662
