Discussion About Demographic Distribution And Surgery Technique Of Our Apendectomy Cases

Year 2016, Volume: 18 Issue: 1, 16 - 17, 01.03.2016

Sami Doğan Mehmet Fuat Çetin

Abstract

In this study we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic and openappendectomy with suspected appendicitis from August 2012 to August 2014.In this study data from 131 patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy betweenAugust 2012 and August 2014 in Van Training and Research Hospital were examinedretrospectively for demographic characteristics. In the laparoscopic appendectomy grouphandmade endoloop technique was used for closing the base of the appendix. Mc Burney’sincision was used for open appendectomy.47% of patients were female (n = 62), 53% of patients were male (n = 69). The average age ofthe patients was 27.7 years. According to surgical technique, open appendectomy was performed15% (n = 20), laparoscopic appendectomy was performed 85% (n = 110). For 3 patients,laparoscopic appendectomy was planned but then operation was converted to open techniquedue to device problems. PID has been detected in one patient who underwent diagnosticlaparoscopy so appendectomy was not performed. Postoperative drainage tube was placed to15% of patients (n = 20). Wound infection was seen in 4 open appendectomy performed patients(20%). Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (2.2 days vs 2.8days). Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe and efficient as open appendectomy in the treatment ofacute appendicitis

Keywords

Acute appendicitis, Laparoscopic appendectomy, wound infection

APENDEKTOMİ OLGULARIMIZIN DEMOGRAFİK DAĞILIMI VE CERRAHİ TEKNİK AÇISINDAN İRDELENMESİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmadaki amacımız Ağustos 2012- Ağustos 2014 tarihleri arasında akut apandisit tanısıylalaparoskopik ve açık teknikle apendektomi yapılan olguların irdelenmesi amaçlandı. Çalışmamızda Ağustos 2012 ve Ağustos 2014 tarihleri arasında Van Eğitim AraştırmaHastanesinde akut apandisit ön tanısı ile opere olan 131 hastanın verileri demografik özellikleriretrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Operasyon sırasında laparoskopik yapılan vakalardaekstrakorporeal sütür tekniği ile apendiks güdüğü bağlandı. Açık apendektomilerde Mc Burneykesi yapıldı.Hastaların % 47’ si bayan (n:62), % 53’ü erkekti (n:69). Hastaların yaş ortalaması 27,7. Cerrahiteknik olarak % 15 açık apendektomi (n:20), % 85 laparoskopik apendektomi (n:110) yapıldı.Laparoskopik apendektomi planlanan 3 hastada teknik aksaklıklar nedeniyle açığa dönüldü. 1hastada diagnostik laparoskopi sonrası PID tanısı konmuş olup apendektomi yapılmamıştır.Hastaların %15’ine postop dren konulmuştur (n:20). Yara yeri enfeksiyonu açık apendektomiyapılan 4 olguda görülmüştür (% 20). Laparoskopik apendektomi yapılan hasta grubunda açıkapendektomi yapılanlara göre hastanede ortalama kalış süresi daha kısa bulundu (2,2 gün, 2,8gün). Laparoskopik apendektomi akut apandisitin tedavisinde açık apendektomi kadar güvenilirve uygulanabilir bir tekniktir

Keywords

Akut apandisit, Laparoskopik apendektomi, yara enfeksiyonu

References

• Saia M, Buja A, Baldovin T, Callegaro G, Sandonà P, Mantoan D, et al. Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2353-9.
• Suh YJ, Jeong SY, Park KJ, Park JG, Kang SB, Kim DW, et al. Comparison of surgical-site infection between open and laparoscopic appendectomy. J Korean Surg Soc 2012; 82: 35- 9.
• Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, Ketana N, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, et al. Does Laparoscopic Appendectomy Impart an Advantage over Open Appendectomy in Elderly Patients? World J Surg 2012; 36: 1534-9.
• Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 334-337
• Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, et al. Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1174- 1180
• Khan MN, Fayyad T, Cecil TD, Moran BJ. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: the risk of postoperative infectious complications. JSLS 2007; 11: 363-7.
• Hussain A, Mahmood H, Nicholls J, El-Hasani S. Prevention of intra-abdominal abscess following laparoscopic appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective study. Int J Surg 2008; 6: 374-7.
• Tan-Tam C, Yorke E, Wasdell M, Barcan C, Konkin D, Blair P. The benefits of laparoscopic appendectomies in obese patients. Am J Surg 2012; 203: 609-12.
• Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the Millennium. Radiology 2000;215:337-48.
• Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 6: CD001546.
• Liu Z, Zhang P, Ma Y, Chen H, Zhou Y, Zhang M, et al. Laparoscopy or not: a meta-analysis of the surgical effects of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2010; 20: 362-70.