<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>e-ijer</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">1309-6265</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Erdal TOPRAKCI</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19160/e-ijer.37841</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Studies on Education</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
                                    <trans-title>Determining the Environmental Perceptions of Pre-Service Science Teachers through Word Association / Fen Bilimleri Öğretmen Adaylarının Çevre Algılarının Kelime İlişkilendirme Aracılığıyla Belirlenmesi</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <article-title>Fen Bilimleri Öğretmen Adaylarının Çevre Algılarının Kelime İlişkilendirme Aracılığıyla Belirlenmesi  / Determining the Environmental Perceptions of Pre-Service Science Teachers through Word Association</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Özata Yücel</surname>
                                    <given-names>Arş.grv.dr.elif</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Özkan</surname>
                                    <given-names>Prof.dr.muhlis</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20150324">
                    <day>03</day>
                    <month>24</month>
                    <year>2015</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>5</volume>
                                        <issue>4</issue>
                                        <fpage>41</fpage>
                                        <lpage>56</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20140930">
                        <day>09</day>
                        <month>30</month>
                        <year>2014</year>
                    </date>
                                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2010, e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2010</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                            <p>The correct perception and comprehension of environment by students is influential on developing, in them, interest, awareness, and a positive attitude about acquiring environmental knowledge. Thus, examining the perception of the concept environment is important. The capability of teachers to perceive the environment in a correct and holistic way may contribute to the proper construction of these concepts in students&#039; minds and the development of positive attitudes towards the environment among the students. This study aimed to determine the environmental perceptions of pre-service science teachers. Method: In this study, one of the qualitative research designs – case study design, was used. This study was a holistic single-case design. The Word Association Test (WAT) containing the key concept environment was administered to 122 pre-service science teachers. The students were asked to write their answers about the key concept and then construct sentences in 30 seconds involving the given answers. The answers of the students about the key concept were examined under four main themes: “natural environment”, “artificial environment”, “environmental problems”, and “emotions and situations”. The theme “natural environment” was divided into following sub-themes: “living elements”, “nonliving elements”, and “ecological concepts”.Discussion, Conclusion, and Implications: The analysis of the students&#039; answers about the key concept showed that the perceptions of the students about natural environment varied more in comparison to their perceptions about artificial environment.  It was seen that living beings were featured prominently in the perceptions of the pre-service teachers participating in the study. The research results indicated that most students had an anthropocentric environmental perception. Another observation about living elements was the association of environment with family and society. A limited number of answers were given in regard to nonliving elements. The most frequently given answer was “weather”. Thus, the pre-service teachers had a low-level perception regarding nonliving elements. Under the sub-theme ecological concepts, environment was associated with nature and forest involving living and nonliving beings by many pre-service teachers. The participants associated environment with natural environment to a great degree. Under the theme artificial environment, “house” and “building/apartment” were most frequently stated by the students. The majority of the students associated environment with environmental problems such as pollution and garbage. It was also observed that the students associated environment with many situations and emotions including “cleanness”, “life”, and “happiness”. The literature review indicated that most of the research focusing on perception and comprehension regarding environment was conducted at middle school level. A remarkable aspect of the present study is that the perceptions of the students were highly similar despite the age difference between them. It can be concluded that the environmental perceptions of students continue to be limited even after rise in their educational levels. Especially the fact that the study group consisted of pre-service science teachers, who are expected to lay the foundations of environmental education, reveals that more research should be conducted in this field, and pre-service teachers should be educated effectively about environment. The results obtained in the present study highlight that there are certain deficiencies in efforts to create an environmental perception that is integrated, ordered, and functional within itself as stated in today&#039;s scientific discourse. These results also reveal that the teaching of environmental concepts and situations should be designed and implemented within the framework of environmental science data.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <abstract><p>Bu çalışmada, Fen Bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının çevre algılarını belirlemek için 122 kişiye Kelime İlişkilendirme Testi uygulanmıştır. Uygulamada; “Çevre” anahtar kavram olarak verilmiş ve ayrıca, öğretmen adaylarının bu anahtar kavramla ilgili cümle kurmaları istenmiştir. “Çevre” anahtar kavramına ilişkin sonuçlar doğal çevre”, “yapay çevre”, “çevre sorunları” ve “duygu ve durumlar” olmak üzere dört ana tema altında değerlendirilmiştir. Bunlardan doğal çevre teması; “canlı öğeler”, “cansız öğeler” ve “ekolojik kavramlar” alt temaları altında incelenmiştir. .Araştırmaya katılan öğretmen adaylarının çoğunun hem doğal hem de yapay çevreyle ilgili zihinsel şemalarının mevcut olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Ancak öğretmen adaylarının, doğal çevreyle ilgili algıları yapay çevre ile ilgili algılarından daha fazla çeşitlilik göstermektedir. Canlı varlıklardan özellikle ağaç, insan, hayvan, çiçek ve arkadaş/komşu kelimeleri çevre ile daha fazla ilişkilendirilmiştir. Ayrıca çevre kavramını aile ve toplumla da ilişkilendirmiş oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Birçok öğretmen adayının kurmuş olduğu cümlelerden çevrenin, insan odaklı olarak algılandığı anlaşılmaktadır. Cansız varlıklarla ilgili yanıt sayısının ise az olduğu görülmüştür. Birçok öğretmen adayı tarafından çevrenin hem canlı hem de cansız öğelerden oluşan; tabiat/doğa, orman ve ekosistem olduğu şeklinde yanıtlar verilmiştir. Doğal çevre kadar olmasa da katılıcıların yapay çevreyle ilgili algılarının da çeşitli olduğu söylenebilir. Kirlilik, çöp gibi yanıtların, sıkça verilmesi, zihinlerde çevreyle sorunların da ilişkilendirdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca katılımcıların algılarında çevrenin; temiz, düzen, sevgi, dostluk gibi çevresel durum ve duygularla da ilişkilendirdikleri anlaşılmıştır. Kelime ilişkilendirme yöntemiyle elde edilen sonuçlar, günümüz bilimsel öğretilerinde yer alan bütünleşik, düzenli ve kendi içinde işlevselliği olan bir çevre kavramı algısı konusunda, bir takım eksikliklerin bulunduğu gerçeğinin, bir kez daha vurgulanmasına neden olmaktadır. Çevreyle ilgili kavram ve durumların, çevre bilimi verileri çerçevesinde öğretimlerinin tasarlanması ve uygulamasında, bunların dikkate alınarak sürdürülmesine ihtiyaç olduğu anlaşılmaktadır</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Çevre Algısı</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   Çevre Eğitimi</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   Fen Bilimleri</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   Kelime İlişkilendirme</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                                                    <kwd>Environmental Perception</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Environmental Education</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Sciences</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Word Association</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Pre-Service Teachers</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Atasoy, B. (2004). Fen öğrenimi ve öğretimi. Asil Yayın Dağıtım. 2. baskı: Ankara.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ayas, A. (2005). Kavram öğrenimi. Çepni, S. (Ed). Fen ve teknoloji öğretimi (65-90). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aydın, F. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin “çevre” kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 26,25-44.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bahar, M., Özatlı, N.S. (2003). Kelime iletişim test yöntemi ile lise 1. Sınıf öğrencilerinin canlıların temel bileşenleri konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının araştırılması. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 75–85.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., Sutcliffe, R. G. (1999). Investigation of students&#039; cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33(3), 134–141.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Barraza, L. (1999). Children&#039;s drawings about the environment. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 49-66.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Demirkaya, H. (2009). Prospective primary school teachers’ understanding of the environment: A qualitative study. European Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 75-81.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Desjean-Perrotta, B., Moseley, C., and Cantu, L.E. (2008). Preservice teachers&#039; perceptions of the environment: Does ethnicity or dominant residential experience matter?. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 21-32,</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gökdere, M. (2005). A study on environmental knowledge level of primary students in science education. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), artical 5.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gunston, R. F. (1980). Word association and the description of cognitive structure. Research in Science Education 10, 45-53.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lang, J. (2000). Tracing changes in teacher environmental education understanding. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 15/16, 59-67. in Loughland, T, Reid, A., and Petocz, P. (2002). Young people&#039;s conceptions of environment: A phenomenographic analysis. Environmental Education Research, 8(2),187-197</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Loughland, T., Reid, A., and Petocz, P. (2002). Young people&#039;s conceptions of environment: A phenomenographic analysis. Environmental Education Research, 8(2),187-197, doi: 10.1080/13504620220128248</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Miles, M. B., Huberman, A.M. (1994).Qualitative data analysis. USA: Sage Publication.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Moseley, C., Desjean‐Perrotta, B., and Utley, J. (2010). The draw‐an‐environment test rubric (DAET‐R): Exploring pre‐service teachers’ mental models of the environment. Environmental Education Research, 16(2), 189-208.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nakiboğlu, C. (2008). Using word associations for assessing non major science students’ knowledge structure before and after general chemistry instruction: the case of atomic structure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 9, 309-322.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (second edition). USA: Sage Publications.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shepardson, D. P. (2005) Student ideas: What is an environment?. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(4) 49-58.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shepardson, D.P, Wee, B., Priddy, M., Harbor, J. (2007). Students&#039; mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2),327–348.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shavelson, R. J. (1974). Methods for examining representations of a subject matter structure in a student’s memory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 11(3), 231-249.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tsai, C.C., Huang, C.M. (2002). Exploring students&#039; cognitive structures in learning science: a review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 163-169.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Timur, S. (2012). Examining cognitive structures of prospective preschool teachers concerning the subject “force and motion”. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. (Special Issue, Autumn), 3039-3049.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özata Yücel, E., Özkan, M. (2013). 2013 fen bilimleri programının 2005 fen ve teknoloji programıyla çevre konularının işlenişi açısından karşılaştırılması. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1), 237-265.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özsoy, S. (2012). Investigating elementary school students’ perceptions about environment through their drawings. Educational Science: Theory &amp; Practice, 12(2), 1132-1139.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yardımcı, E., Bağcı Kılıç, G. (2010). Çocukların gözünden çevre ve çevre sorunları. İlköğretim Online, 9(3),1122-1136.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yavetz, B.,Goldman, D., and Pe’er, S. (2014). How do preservice teachers perceive ‘environment’ and its relevance to their area of teaching?. Environmental Education Research, 20(3),354-371.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research design and methods. USA: Sage Publications.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Determining the Environmental Perceptions of Pre-Service</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Science Teachers through Word Association</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
