The Attitude toward Obese Children Scale:A Study of Validity and Reliability

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 40 - 53, 03.07.2015

Prof.dr.seher Balcı Çelik Öğrt.gör.meryem Vural Batık Kemal Özcan Seval Aksoy

https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.94465

Cited By: 1

Öz

Obesity appears as the disease and problem of our age and continues to increase day by day. This continuing increase is the focus of attention especially for studies in the field of health (Kabalcıoğlu vd., 2012). Obesity is not regarded as only a health problem. It has also been of interest to psychology due to its adverse social and psychological effects on children (Buğrul vd., 2012; Puhl and Brownell, 2001; Chandler vd., 1994). These adverse effects are stated to be resulted from people’s negative attitudes toward obese children (Yılmaz vd., 2010). The present study aims to develop a valid and reliable Attitude Scale to be used to determine children’s attitudes toward their obese peers.
Method: Within the development process of “Attitude Toward Obese Children Scale”, the aim of the study, data were obtained from 823 students in total, 479 (58.2%) of whom are females and 344 of whom are males (41.8%) studying in secondary schools in Samsun in 2012-2013 academic year. Students’ age ranged between 10 and 14. Further, 38.6% (n=318) were fifth-grade students; 16.4% (n=135) were sixth-grade students; 23.8% (n=196) were seventh-grade students and 21.1% (n=174) were eighth-grade students among those who participated in the survey. The first version of the scale developed to determine attitudes of obese children consisted of 95 items. Following the item analysis, 41 items remained. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis conducted for structure validity yielded two factors called “rejection of obese peer and acceptation of obese peer”. The last and most ideal version of the scale consisted of 16 items and two sub-dimensions. The reliability coefficient determined by the test-retest method and Cronbach's alpha.
Findings: The scale consists of 16 items and two sub-dimensions. The lowest point and the highest point to be taken from the six-point Likert-type scale are 0 and 80 respectively. Higher the scores obtained from the scale indicates positive attitude toward obese peer. Sub-dimension of “Rejection of Obese Peer” consists of 9 items and accounts for 24.72% of the variance. Sub-dimension of “Acceptation of Obese Peer consists of 7 items and accounts for 20.23% of the variance. These two sub-factors together account for 44.95% of the total variance concerning the variable of attitude toward obese children. The factor loadings of the scale items range between .44 and .70. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, the proposed model with 16 observed variables and 2 latent variables was found significant. It was determined that the values whose standardized values are shown in the diagram were not above “1”. There was no inconsistency between observed and latent variables. Thus, the values obtained and factor loadings of the items show that the model is acceptable ( /sd=1.57, RMSEA= 0.04, GFI= 0.93, AGFI= 0.91, SRMR= 0.05, NNFI= 0.94 ve CFI= 0.95, p< .00). The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach’s Alpha) of the scale conducted on the secondary school students was computed .76. The reliability coefficient determined by the test-retest method was calculated .78 (p<.001). The split-half reliability coefficient was .82 for the first half and .76 for the second.
Conclusions and Recommendations: The values obtained from the present study indicate that the “Attitude toward Obese Children Scale” developed for Turkish Culture in order to determine students’ attitudes toward obese peers is a valid and reliable scale. This study was performed along with the data obtained from students studying in secondary schools. Scale versions appropriate for all age groups could be developed thereby carrying out validity and reliability studies of the scale with different groups and age ranges. Studies should not only determine levels, factors and results of obesity, but also primarily aim to inform parents and teachers about obesity as a public health problem and to prepare training programs concerning this issue. Considering psychological and social problems obese children experience, improving attitudes toward obese children is as essential as the prevention of obesity in terms of health. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Obesity, Obese children, Attitude toward obese children, Attitude scale

Obez Çocuklara Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, obez çocuklara karşı akranlarının tutumlarını belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Çalışma 2012-2013 eğitim öğretim yılında Samsun ilinde ortaokul düzeyindeki 823 öğrenci grubundan elde edilen veriler üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen “Obez Çocuklara Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği” 16 maddelik altılı Likert tipi bir ölçektir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliğini belirlemek amacıyla yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda iki alt boyutlu bir yapıya sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin “Obez Akranı Reddetme” olarak adlandırılan birinci alt boyutu 9 maddeden oluşmakta ve varyansın %24.72’sini açıklamaktadır. “Obez Akranı Kabul Etme” olarak adlandırılan ikinci alt boyutu ise 7 maddeden oluşmakta ve varyansın % 20.23’ünü açıklamaktadır. Bu iki alt boyut birlikte obez çocuklara yönelik tutum değişkenine ilişkin toplam varyansın %44.95’ini açıklamaktadır. Ölçeği oluşturan maddelere ilişkin faktör yükleri ise .44 ile .70 arasında değişmektedir. Ayrıca yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile modelin iyi uyum gösterdiği belirlenmiştir ( /sd=1.57, RMSEA= 0.04, GFI= 0.93, AGFI= 0.91, SRMR= 0.05, NNFI= 0.94 ve CFI= 0.95, p< .00). Ortaokul öğrencileri üzerinde geliştirilen ölçeğin iç tutarlılık (Cronbach’s alpha) katsayısı .76 ve test tekrar test güvenirlik korelasyon katsayısı .78 (p<.001) bulunmuştur. Test yarılama güvenirliği katsayısı ise, ilk yarı için .82, ikinci yarı için .76’dır. Elde edilen bu değerler Obez Çocuklara Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği’nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğunu göstermektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Obezite, Obez Çocuklar, Obez Çocuklara Yönelik Tutum, Tutum Ölçeği

Kaynakça

• Arslan, M., Başkal, N. ve Çorakçı, A. (1999). Ulusal Obezite Rehberi. Türkiye Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Derneği Yayını.
• Arslan, C. ve Ceviz, D. (2007). Ev Hanımı ve Çalışan Kadınların Obezite Prevalansı ve Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 21 (5): 211 – 220.
• Bacardi-Gascon, M., Leon-Reyez, M.J. & Jimenez-Cruz, A. (2007). Stigmatization of Overweight Mexican Children. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 38(2):99-105.
• Bacon, J. G., Scheltema, K. E. & Robinson, B. E. (2001). Fat Phobia Scale Revisited: The Short Form. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 25(2):252-7.
• Bagley, C.R., Conklin, D.N., Isherwood, R.T., Pechiulis, D.R. & Watson, L.A. (1989). Attitudes of Nurses Toward Obesity and Obese Patients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68:954.
• Buğrul, N., Tözün, M., Arslantaş, D. ve Ünsal A. (2012). Lise Öğrencileri Arasında Umutsuzluk ve Depresyon. Halk Sağlığı Günleri 2. Ulusal Okul Sağlığı Sempozyumu, Mayıs 2012, Adana.
• Butler, G.S., Vallis, T.M., Perey, B., Veldhuyzenvan Zanten, S.J., MacDonald, A.S. & Konok, G. (1999). The Obesity Adjustment Survey: Development of a Scale to Assess Psychological Adjustment to Morbid Obesity. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders,23(5):505-11.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009).Sosyal Bilimler Için Veri Analizi El Kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. Ankara: PegemYayınları.
• Cacherlin, F.M., Rebeck, R.M., Chung, G.H. & Pelayo, E. (2002). Does Ethnicity İnfluence Body-Size Preference? A Comparison of Body İmage and Body Size. Obesity Research,10(3):158-166.
• Chambliss, H. O., Finley, C. E. & Blair, S. N. (2004). Attitudes Toward Obese İndividuals Among Exercise Science Students. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36(3):468-74.
• Chandler, B., Abood, A., Dae, T. & Cleveland, Z. (1994). Pathogenic Eating Studies And Behaviors And Body Dissatisfaction Differences Among Black and White College Students. International Journal of Eating Disorders,2:319-28.
• Dedeli, Ö. ve Fadıloğlu, Ç. (2011). Obezitede Sağlık İnanç Modeli Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 10(5): 533-542.
• DeJong, W. (1993). Obesity as a characterological stigma: The issue of responsibility and judgments of task performance. Psychological Reports, 73, 963–970.
• Harris, M. B., Sandoval, W. M. & Cortese, S. (1998). Introductory Nutrition Students´ Attitudes Towards Obesity: Ethnic and Gender Differences, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 22(4),231-40.
• Harper, D.C., Wacker, D. P., & Seaborg-Cobb, L. S. (1986). Children’s social preferences toward peers with visible physical differences. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11, 323–342.
• Hill, J.O.,Sallis, J.F. & Peters, J.C. (2004). Economic Analysis of Eating and Physical Activity. A Next Step for Research and Policy Change. The American College of Preventive Medicine, 27 (3S):111-116.
• Hovell, M.F, Zakarian, J.M., Wahlgren, D.R. & Matt, G.E. (2000). Reducing Children’s Exposure To Environmental Tobacco Smoke: The Empirical Evidence And Directions For Future Research. Tobacco Control, (2); ii40-i47.
• International Obesity Taskforce, (2013). The Global Epidemic. http://www.iaso.org/iotf/obesity/obesitytheglobalepidemic/ Erişim tarihi: 02.07.2013.
• Jiménez-Cruz, A., Castellón-Zaragoza, A.M., García-Gallardo, J.L., Bacardí- Gascón, M. & Hovell, M.F. (2008). Strong Beliefs On Personal Responsibilities And Negative Attitudes Towards The Child With Obesity Among Teachers And Parents. Revista Biomedica 2008; 19 (2) :84-91. http://www.revbiomed.uady.mx/pdf/rb081922.pdf Erişim tarihi:02.07.2013.
• Kabalcıoğlu, F., Polat, B. ve Vakar, İ. (2012). Şanlıurfa İli Mehmet Saçlı İlköğretim Okulu 6. 7. Ve 8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinde Obezite Durumu Ve Etkileyen Faktörler. Halk Sağlığı Günleri 2. Ulusal Okul Sağlığı Sempozyumu, Mayıs 2012, Adana.
• Koçak, S., Saraç, L. Ve Hürmeriç, I. (2005). Determining the Relationship Among Body Mass Index, Body Composition and Attitudes Toward Fat People. Congress Proceedings Book of the 46th ICHPERD.SD World Congress, 263-264.
• Köksal, G. ve Özel-Gökmen, H. (2008). Çocukluk ve Ergenlik Dönemi Obezite. (Ed.Coşkun, A., Kesici, C., Çelikcan, E. ve Bilici, S.) Hastalıklarda Beslenme ve Obezite Bilgi Serisi. Sağlık Bakanlığı Temel Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, 139-155, Ankara.
• Latner, J.D. & Stunkard, A.J. (2003). Getting Worse: The Stigmatizatio of Obese Children. Obesity Research,93:452-456.
• Leon-Reyes, M.J., Bacardi-Gascón, M. & Jimenez-Cruz, A. (2004). The Stigmatization of Obese Children by Their Mexican Mothers. Obesity Research,12 (Suppl): A75-P287.
• Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M. & Harris, T. (1999). Beliefs and Attitudes about Obesity among Teachers and School Health Care Providers Working with Adolescents. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,31: 3-9.
• Poon, M. Y. & Tarrant, M. (2009). Obesity: Attitudes Of Undergraduate Student Nurses And Registered Nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(16):2355-65.
• Price, J.H, Desmond, S.M, Krol, R.A., Snyder, F.F. & O’Connell, J.K. (1987). Family Practice Physicians Beliefs, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Obesity. The American College of Preventive Medicine, 3:339-45.
• Pudel, V., Metzdorff, M., & Oetting, M. (1975). Zur Personlichkeit Adiposer in Psychologischen Testsunter Berucksichtigunglatent Fettsuhtiger. Zeitschriftfuur Psychosomatische Medizinund Psychoanalys, 21, 345-361.
• Puhl, R. & Brownell, K.D. (2001). Bias, Discrimination, and Obesity.Obesity Research, 9:788-805.
• Puhl, R.M. & Brownell, K.D. (2003). Psychosocial Origins of Obesity Stigma: Toward Changing a Powerful and Pervasive Bias. Obesity Reviews,4:213-27.
• Richardson, S. A., Goodman, N., Hastorf, A. H., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1961). Cultural uniformity in reaction to physical disabilities. American Sociological Review, 26, 241–247.
• Saltzer, E.B. (1982). The Weight Locus of Control (WLOC) Scale: a Specific Measure for Obesity Research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46(6):620-8.
• Sikorski, C.,Luppa, M., Schomerus, G., Werner, P., König H-H & Riedel-Heller, SG. (2012). Public Attitudes towards Prevention of Obesity. PLoS ONE, 7(6): e39325. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039325
• Strauss, R.S. (2000). Childhood Obesity and Self-Esteem. Pediatrics,105(1).
• Stunkard, A.J. (1998). Stigmatization of Obesity in Medieval Times: Asianand Europe. International Journal of Obesity,22:1141-1144.
• Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.
• Şakar. Ş. (2006). Obezitenin Tıbbi Beslenme Tedavisi. Obezite Dergisi, 6(9): s.15-17.
• T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, (2008). Türkiye Sağlıkta Dönüşüm Programı ve Temel Sağlık Hizmetleri. http://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/TSDP.pdf Erişim tarihi:02.07.2013.
• T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı (2010). Türkiye Obezite (Şişmanlık) İle Mücadele ve Kontrol Programı (2010-2014). http://www.bsm.gov.tr/docs adresinden 02.07.2012 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
• World Health Organization, (2013). “Obesity and Overweight”, “Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health”. Erişim tarihi:02.07.2013. http://www.who.int/topics/obesity/en/
• Yabancı, N. (2004). Okul Çağı Çocuklarda Büyüme ve Obezite Durumunun Saptanması, Etkileyen Etmenlerin Değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Beslenme ve Diyetetik Programı DoktoraTezi, Ankara, 2004.
• Yalçın, S.S., Tuğrul, B., Naçar, N., Tuncer, M. ve Yurdakök, K. (2002). Factors that Effect Television Viewing Time in Preschool and Primary School children. Pediatrics International,44(6): 622-627.
• Yılmaz, C.Y., Dinç, Z.F. ve Oskay K. (2010). Kız ve Erkek Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kilolu Bireylere Karşı Tutumlarının Karşılaştırılması. 11th International Sports Sciences Congress, October, Antalya.
• Yu, H.J. (2011). Parental Communication Style’s Impact on Children’s Attitudes Toward Obesity and Food Advertising. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, Spring, 87–107. ISSN 0022-0078.
• The Attitude toward Obese Children Scale: A Study of Validity and Reliability