Investigation of the Effect of Different Content of Mouthwashes on Rezin CAD / CAM Blocks

Abstract

Aim: Using of mouthwashes has become more popular recently as a result of the studies on reducing the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The aim of this study is to examine the effect of different content mouthwashes on the color changes. Methods: Two different resin-based CAD/CAM materials (Vita Enamic and Brilliant Crios) were used in the study (n=32). 64 samples were prepared by taking 2 × 7 × 12 mm sized sections from CAD/CAM blocks (n=32). After the samples were kept in artificial saliva at 37° C for 24 hours, initial color measurements were made with a spectrophotometer device (VITA Easy shade V, Germany). Then the samples were kept in 3 different mouthwashes containing Cetylpyridinium chloride (Oral-B), Povidone iodine (Batiqon) and Chlorhexidine (Kloroben) twice a day for 1 minute (n=8). Color measurement of the samples was repeated on the 7th, 14th and 30th days. Color change values (ΔE00) were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test (p<0.05). Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the color changes of resin-based CAD/CAM blocks held in mouthwash at the end of the 7th, 14th and 30th days (p>0.05). Conclusion: At the end of the 30th day, color change was observed below the noticeable threshold value (ΔE00>0.8) in the hybrid ceramic CAD/CAM block samples (Vita Enamic) . In composite-reinforced CAD/CAM samples (Brilliant Crios), only Povidone-iodine-containing mouthwash produced color change above the noticeable threshold value (ΔE00>0.8), while Chlorhexidine and Cetylpyridinium chloride did not produce a noticeable change.

Keywords

• Mouthwash
• COVID-19
• CAD / CAM materials
• Discoloration

References

1. 1. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltratedceramic- network materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29:419-26.
2. 2. Malekipour MR, Sharafi A, Kazemi S, Khazaei S, Shirani F. Comparison of color stability of a composite resin in different color media. Dent Res J. 2012;9:441-6.
3. 3. Gunsolley JC. A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1649-57.
4. 4. Carrouel F, Gonçalves LS, Conte MP, Campus G, Fisher J, Fraticelli L, et al. Antiviral Activity of Reagents in Mouth Rinses against SARS-CoV-2. J Dent Res. 2021 Feb;100:124-32.
5. 5. Peng X, Xu X, Li Y, Cheng L, Zhou X, Ren B. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12:9.
6. 6. To KK, Tsang OT, Chik-Yan Yip C, Chan KH, Wu TC, Chan JMC, et al. Consistent detection of 2019 novel coronavirus in saliva. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:841-3.
7. 7. Herrera D, Serrano J, Roldán S, Sanz M. Is the oral cavity relevant in SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?. Clin Oral Invest. 2020;24:2925-30.
8. 8. Sharma G, Wu W, Dalal E. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl. 2005;30:21-30.

9. 9. Gurgan S, Yalcin Cakir F. The effect of three different mouthrinses on the surface hardness, gloss and colour change of bleached nano composite resins. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2008;16:104-8.
10. 10. Kuzu TE, Karatas O. The effects of mouthwashes and antiseptics on color stability of different composite resin. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2021;31:71-6.