Evaluation of clinical success of condansable composite restorations in class-I cavities in fluorosed teeth according to USPHS Modified Ryge criteria

Year 2012, Volume: 39 Issue: 2 - Volume: 39 Issue: 2, 57 - 66, 01.05.2012

Yıldırım Erdoğan Çiğdem Küçükeşmen

Abstract

Dental fluorosis is a developmental problem of teeth, caused by intake of chronical high levels of fluoride during tooth development. In many cases, tooth enamel becomes an opaque, porous and mottled appearance ranging from white to yellow-brown and black. Isparta is an endemic fluorosis area in Turkey. The aim of this study was evaluate the clinical performance of a packable composite resin Filtek P60, 3M-ESPE, USA which applied to fluorosed permanent molar teeth according to “Modified Ryge Criteria” in children and adolescents. Teeth were grouped according to ThylstrupFejerskov Index as; TFI into normal TFI 0 , mild fluorosis TFI 1-2 , moderate fluorosis TFI 3-4 and severe fluorosis TFI 5-7 . 145 Class I restorations were placed in these permanent molar teeth. Restorations were assesed by two previously calibrated operators in 3rd and 6th and 12th month for marginal discoloration, secondary caries, marginal adaptation, anatomic form, postoperative sensitivity, retantion.and colour matching At the final appointment after one year 99.2 %, 99.5 %, 99.1 %, 96.9 % respectively of the restorations in normal, mild, moderate and severe fluorosis groups received Alfa ratings. A high percentage of optimal scores were recorded for secondary caries, anatomic form and retantion. For marginal adaptation, three restorations in severe fluorosis group received a score of Bravo 11.1 % . The clinical performance of Filtek P60 packable composite resin was excellent after 1 year. Nevertheless, we thought that, long-term clinical evaluations are necessary.

Keywords

Clinical performance, Condansable composites, Dental fluorosis

Florozisli dişlerde sınıf-I kavitelerde kondanse edilebilir kompozit restorasyonların klinik başarısının USPHS Modifiye Ryge kriterlerine göre değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Dişsel florozis, diş gelişimi sırasında kronik olarak yüksek seviyede flor alımına bağlı olarak meydana gelen gelişimsel bir problemdir. Birçok olguda diş minesi opak, pöröz, beyazdan sarıkahverengi ve siyaha kadar değişen renklenmiş bir görünüme sahiptir. Isparta, Türkiye’de bulunan endemik bir florozis bölgesidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, çocuk ve adölesan hastalardaki florozisli daimi büyük azı dişlerine uygulanan bir kondanse edilebilir kompozit rezinin Filtek P60, 3M-ESPE, USA klinik performansının “Modifiye Ryge Kriterleri” doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesidir. ve bütün dişlere Sınıf I restorasyonlar uygulanmıştır. Restorasyonlar 3., 6. ve 12. aylarda, daha önceden kalibre olmuş iki diş hekimi tarafından, kenar renklenmesi, sekonder çürük, kenar uyumu, anatomik form, postoperatif hassasiyet, retansiyon ve renk uyumu kriterleri bakımından değerlendirilmiştir. Dişlerin bir yılın sonundaki son değerlendirilmelerinde, normal, hafif, orta şiddette ve şiddetretansiyon kriterlerinde yüksek oranda başarı gözlenmiştir. Kenar uyumu kriteri için, şiddetli florozis grubunda üç restorasyon “Bravo” skoru almıştır % 11.1 .Bir yıl sonunda Filtek P60 kondanse edilebilir kompozit rezinin klinik performansı oldukça iyi bulunmuştur. Ancak, daha uzun süreli klinik takibin de gerekli olduğu düşünülmektedir

Keywords

Klinik performans, Kondanse edilebilir kompozitler, Dişsel florozis

References

• Aoba T, Fejerskov O. Dental fluorosis: chemistry and biology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002; 13: 155-70.
• NRC (National Research Council), Comission on Life Sciences. Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1993.
• Ulusu T, Ölmez S, Köse MR, Üstündağ M, Aycan E. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlügü Türkiye’nin Su Flor Haritası. Ankara: Bakanlık Basımevi, 2003.
• Usmen E, Altay N, Ölmez S, Ataç A, Batırbaygil Y. Türkiye genelinde sulardaki flor seviyeleri. TDBD 1997; 39: 42-3.
• Whitford GM, Ekstrand J. Summary of Session I: Metabolism of fluoride. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 513.
• Buzalaf MA, Granjeiro JM, Damante CA, de Ornelas F. Fluoride content of infant formulas prepared with deionized, bottled min- eral and fluoridated drinking water. ASDC J Dent Child 2001; 68: 37-41.
• Rahul P, Hedge AM, Munshi AK. Es- timation of the fluoride concentrations in hu- man breast milk, cow’s milk and infant formu- lae. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003; 27: 257-60.
• Küçükeşmen Ç, Sönmez H. Dişhekimliğinde florun, insan vücudu ve dişler üzerindeki etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. SDÜ Tıp Fak Derg. 2008; 15: 43-53.
• Waggoner WF, Johnston WM, Schu- mann S, Schikowski E. Microabrasion of hu- man enamel in vitro using hydrochloric acid and pumice. Pediatr Dent 1989; 11: 319-23.
• Ateyah N, Akpata E. Factors affecting shear bond strength of composite resin to fluo- rosed human enamel. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 216-22.
• Küçükeşmen Ç, Sönmez H, Üşümez A, Küçükeşmen HC. Effects of dental fluorosis on microleakage from Class-V ormocer resto- rations in permanent molar teeth. Fluoride 2007; 40: 134-9.
• Küçükeşmen Ç, Sönmez H. Microlea- kage of Class-V composite restorations with different bonding systems on fluorosed teeth. Eur J Dent. 2008; 2: 48-58.
• Aras ù, ùaroğlu I, ùen Tunç E, Küçükeşmen Ç. Florozis Tanısında Hasta Hi- kayesinin Önemi (Vaka nedeniyle). A.Ü Diş Hek.Fak Derg 2005; 32: 71-8.
• Aras ù, Küçükeşmen Ç, Küçükeşmen HC. Influences of dental fluorosis and deprote- inisation treatment on shear bond strengths of composite restorations in permanent molar teeth. Fluoride 2007; 40: 290-1.
• Kırzıoğlu Z, Küçükeşmen Ç, Altun AC, Erdoğan Y. Evaluation of caries incidence and severity of age-6 teeth in children between 7 and 10 years-old with dental fluorosis and non-fluorosis. Fluoride 2007; 40: 290.
• Sönmez H, Bezgin T. Mineralizasyon ve Maturasyon Sorunlu Dişlerde Adeziv Sis- temlerin Uygulanmasında Dikkat Edilecek Hu- suslar. Türkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci-Special Topics 2011; 2: 23-30.
• McCabe JF, Walls A. Applied dental materials. 8th ed. Madlen MA-USA: Blackwell Publishing Co: 1998.
• Baghdadi ZD. Preservation-based ap- proaches to restore posterior teeth with amal- gam, resin or a combination of materials. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 54-65.
• Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ Jr. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 234-49.
• Küçükeşmen Ç, Küçükeşmen HC. " Konik Diş Anomalisi " bulunan üç farklı olgu- nun, kompozit veneer restorasyonlarla estetik ve fonksiyonel tedavisi (Olgu bildirimi). AÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2005; 32: 215-21.
• Küçükeşmen HC, Üşümez A, Uludağ BC, Küçükeşmen Ç, Gündüz B. LED ışık kaynağı ile polimerize edilen farklı rezin kom- pozit materyallerin polimerizasyon düzeyleri- nin incelenmesi. Türk Diş Hekimliği Dergisi 2007;68:108-12.
• Küçükeşmen Ç, Öztaş DD, Küçükeşmen HC, ERKUT S. Farklı ışık kaynakları ile polimerize edilen kompozit, kompomer ve cam iyonomer siman materyalle- rin su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük düzeylerinin incelenmesi. SDÜ Tıp Fak Derg. 2007 Haziran 14:17-23.
• Li Y, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK, Roberts TA. Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 1396-401.
• Choi KK, Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ, Charlton D. Properties of packable dental composites. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 216-26.
• Ferracane JL, Antonio RC, Matsumoto H. Variables affecting the fracture toughness of dental composites. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1140-5.
• Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler lev- el, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997; 76(7): 1405-11.
• Dayangaç B. Kompozit Rezin Restora- syonlar. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 2000.
• Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig 2005; 9: 215-32.
• Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent As- soc 1973; 87: 369-77.
• Marshall TA, Levy SM, Warren JJ, Broffitt B, Eichenberger-Gilmore JM, Stumbo PJ. Associations between intakes of fluoride from beverages during infancy and dental fluo- rosis of primary teeth. J Am Coll Nutr 2004; 23: 108-16.
• Vieira AP, Hancock R, Limeback H, Maia R, Grynpas MD. Is fluoride concentra- tion in dentin and enamel a good indicator of dental fluorosis? J Dent Res 2004; 83: 76-80.
• Wright JT, Chen SC, Hall KI, Yamau- chi M, Bawden JW. Protein characterization of fluorosed human enamel. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1936-41.
• Ellwood R, O'Mullane D, Clarkson J, Driscoll W. A comparison of information rec- orded using the Thylstrup Fejerskov index, Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis and Deve- lopmental Defects of Enamel index. Int Dent J 1994; 44: 628-36.
• Rozier, R.G. Epidemiologic indices for measuring the clinical manifestations of dental fluorosis: Overview and critique. Adv Dent Res 1994; 8: 39-55.
• Arenholt-Bindslev D. Environmental aspects of dental filling materials. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 713-20.
• Bayne SC, Thompson JY. Biomate- rials. In: Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, eds. 5th ed., Missouri: Mosby Inc; 2006.
• Roberson TM., Heymann HO, Ritter AV. Introduction To Composite Restorations. In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, eds. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed.,Missouri: Mosby Inc; 2006: p. 497-526.
• Loguercio AD, Reis A, Hernandez PA, Macedo RP, Busato AL. 3-Year clinical evalu- ation of posterior packable composite resin res- torations. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 144-51.
• Hayashi M, Wilson NH. Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensi- tivity. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 681-8.
• Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 305-9.
• Dresch W, Volpato S, Gomes JC, Ri- beiro NR, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in post- erior teeth: 12-month results. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 409-17.
• Sadeghi M, Lynch CD, Shahamat N. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of micro- hybrid, packable and nanofilled resin compo- sites in Class I restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 532-7.
• Kiremitci A, Alpaslan T, Gurgan S. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable com- posite restorations. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 11-7.
• Waidyasekera PGK, Nikaido T, Wee- rasinghe DDS, Tagami J. Bonding of acid-etch and self-etch adhesives to human fluorosed dentine. J Dent 2007; 35: 915-22.
• Agee K, Pashley E, Itthagarun A, Sano H, Tay F, Pashley D. Submicron hiati in acid- etched dentin are artifacts of desiccation. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 60-8.
• Carvalho R, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley D, Prati C, Tay F. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1035-42.