Measurement Of Electromagnetıc Radıatıon Emıtted By Dect Phones Used In Offıce Envıronments And Evaluatıon Of The Results In Terms Of Occupatıonal Health And Safety

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 7 - 22, 27.06.2019

Pınar Baykan Ebru Senemtaşı Ünal

Öz

In our age, depending on the development of technology, the need for electricity and energy is increasing. With these developments, the use of electric tools and equipment in daily life is becoming widespread. Studies have shown that almost all electrical devices emit electromagnetic field (EMF). Therefore, it can be said that all electrical devices used in home and office environments are EMF sources. Some of these devices can be listed as computers, copiers, printers, WLANs and dect phones. Exposure to the electromagnetic field emitted by these devices, which are widely used in office environments where we spend a long part of the day, leads to many health problems. Identifying the factors that threaten the health of the employees and reducing the exposure to EMF in working environments is one of the main objectives of occupational health and safety studies. For this purpose, the amount of electromagnetic radiation emitted by the DECT phones, which is one of the EMF sources used in the office environment, was investigated experimentally. The electromagnetic radiation emitted by the DECT phones was measured on the phone without any action, depending on the distance, and then the same measurements were repeated at the time the phone was called and during the incoming call. Aaronia Spectrun Analyzer HF - 6085 handheld spectrum analyzer was used in the measurements. The measurement results show that the amount of electromagnetic radiation increases as the distance decreases. However, compared to the amount of radiation emitted during a phone call and an incoming call, it was concluded that the radiation emitted during a telephone call was higher. When the measurement results are compared with the limit values ​​determined by the International Commssion on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), it is seen that these values ​​are below the limit values.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Electromagnetic Field (EMF), EMA Sources, Spectrum Analyzer, Radiation, Dect Phones, Exposure

Kaynakça

• Armstrong, B., Thériault, G., Guénel, P., Deadman, J., Goldberg, M., Héroux, P.(1994).Association between exposure to pulsed electromagnetic fields and cancer in electric utility workers in Quebec, Canada, and France. AmJ Epidemiol1994, 140:805-820.
• Arslantaş, N.(2012). Elektromanyetik Alan Şiddetinin Okul ve Sağlık Kuruluşları Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi (tez).Ankara: Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu
• Bethwaite, P., Cook, A., Kennedy, J., Pearce, N. (2001). Acute leukemia in electrical workers: a New Zealand case-control study, Cancer Causes Control, 12(8), 683-9.
• Davis, S., & Mirick, D.K.(2007). Residential Magnetic Fields, Medication Use, and the Risk of Breast Cancer,Epidemiology, 18(2), 266-269.
• Davis, S., Mirick, D.K., Stevens, R.G. (2002). Residential magnetic fields and the risk of breast cancer, Am J Epidemiol,155 (5), 446 – 454.
• Demers, PA, Thomas, DB , Rosenblatt, KA , Jimenez, LM, Mctiernan, A., Stalsberg, H., ... West, DW (1991). Erkeklerde elektromanyetik alanlara ve meme kanserine mesleki maruz kalma . Amerikan Epidemiyoloji Dergisi , 134 (4), 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116095
• Düzgün, S.(2009). Elektromanyetik Alanların İnsan Sağlığı Üzerindeki Zararlı Etkileri (Yayınlanmamış Yükseklisans Tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi/Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,Adana.
• Electromagnetic fields and public health, exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields, Fact Sheet No:322, Geneva: WHO; 2007.
• Erren, T.C. (2001). A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies of electric and magnetic fields and breast cancer in women and man, Bioelectromagnetics suppl, 5,105-19.Extremely low frequency fields, Environmental Health Criteria No:238, Geneva: WHO;2008.
• Grunner, O. (1980). Intermittent electromagnetic fields and their effect on awareness and headache. Fysiatr Revmatol Vestn,58(4),206-215.
• Güler, İ., Çetin, T., Özdemir, A.R., Uçar, N. (2010).Türkiye elektromanyetik alan maruziyet raporu. Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu
• Hardell, L., & Sage, C.(2008). Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy , 62(2), 104-109.
• Harmancı, H., Emre, M., Gurvit, H., Bilgic, B., Hanagasi, H., Gurol, E., et all.(2003). Risk factors for Alzheimer disease: a population-based case-control study in Istanbul, Turkey. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord,17(3):139-45.
• ICNIRP (Uluslararası İyonlaştırıcı Olmayan Radyasyondan Korunma Komisyonu) Zamanla değişen elektriksel, manyetik ve elektromanyetik alanlara (300 GHz'e kadar) maruz kalmanın sınırlandırılması için kılavuz . 1998; 74 : 494-522.
• İlhan, M.N.(2008). Bir Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesinde Elektromanyetik Alan Haritası Çıkarılması ve Sağlık Çalışanlarında Sağlık Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi (Yayınlanmamış Yükseklisans Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi/Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Kapucu, N., Develi, İ. ve Sorgucu, U. (2011). Arama ve Aranma Sırasında GSM 900 MHz Cep Telefonunun Yaydığı Elektromanyetik Radyasyonun Değişiminin Deneysel Olarak Gözlenmesi, Elektrik-Elektronik ve Bilgisayar Sempozyumu, Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
• Karadağ, T., Özdemir, A.R., Abbasov, T.(2014). Seçilmiş bir pilot bölgede uzun süreli ve sürekli elektromanyetik kirlilik seviyelerinin ölçülmesi ve haritalanması. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi ,2(3),239–46.
• Lınet, M.S., Wacholder, S., Zahm, S.H.(2003).Interpreting epidemiologic research: lessons from studies of childhood cancer. Pediatrics. 112 (lptz):218-232.
• NIEHS, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, (2002). Electric and Magnetic Fields Associated with the Use of Electric Power .Erişim:https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/index.cfm
• NIEHS, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, (2018). Erişim. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/Qiu C, Fratiglioni L, Karp A, Winblad B, Bellander T.(2004). Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of Alzheimer's disease. Epidemiology Cambridge, 15(6), 687-94.
• Raymond, A.S. & John W.J. (2014). Physics. (1.Cilt)USA
• Schreier, N., Huss, A., Röösli, M., (2006). The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland, Soz Praventiv Med, 51, 202-209.
• Silsüpür, G.(2014). Ofis Ortamındaki Mesleki Elektromanyetik Alan Maruziyetinin Belirlenmesi ve Risk Düzeyinin Tespit Edilerek Çözüm Önerilerinin Geliştirilmesi, Uzmanlık Tezi, Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
• Şeker, S., & Çerezci, O. (1995) Elektromagnetik Alanların Biyolojik Etkileri Güvenlik standartları ve Koruma Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları
• Türkkan, A. (Ed.). (2012). Elektromanyetik alan ve sağlık etkileri.Bursa: F.Özsan Matbaacılık.
• Türkkan, A., Pala, K. (2009). Çok Düşük Frekanslı Elektromanyetik Radyasyon ve Sağlık Etkileri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2),11-22.
• Uygunol, O.(2009). Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemi Yardımıyla GSM Baz İstasyonlarında Elektromanyetik Alan Kirliliğinin Tespiti ve Konya Örneği (Yayınlanmamış Yükseklisans Tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi/ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
• Van Wıjngaarden, E., Savıtz, D., A. (2000). Exposure to electromagnetic fields and suicide among electric utility workers: a nested case-control study, Occup Environ Med,57:258-263.
• Washburn, E.P., Orza, M.J., Berlin, J.A., Nicholson, W.J., Todd, A.C., Frumkın, H., Chalmers, T.C.(1994). Residential proximity to electricity transmission and distribution equipment and risk of childhood leukemia, childhood lymphoma, and childhood nervous system tumors: systematic review, evaluation, and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control, 5(4),299–309.
• Wertheimer,N., & Leeper,E.(1979). Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer, Am.J.Epidemiol. 109, 273-284.
• Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health, Public Perception of EMF Risks, Fact Sheet 184, Geneva:WHO; 1998.