Evaluation of Online Orthodontics Course Perceptions and Learning Levels of Dentistry Faculty Students

Abstract

Aim This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions, learning levels, and overall experience of dental school students regarding the online Orthodontics course Material and method In this cross-sectional study, 145 participants answered a 25-question survey using Google Forms. The questionnaires were sent to the study participants via e-mail. The findings were analyzed by the Pearson Chi-Square test when the sample size assumption was met (n>5) and Fisher's Exact test when it was not met. Multiple Chi-Square test was used to investigate the relationship between multiple-choice questions. Results A total of 145 participants answered 25 survey questions between February 2022 and May 2022. It was determined that 62.1% of the participants were female and 75.9% were 4th-grade students. It was determined that 57.9% of the participants attended all online courses. Although most of the participants thought that online orthodontic education was well structured (53.1%), well understood (53.8%), had good audio-visual quality (60%), was a good option for orthodontic theoretical learning (54.5%), and provided motivation (42.8%), only 36.7% preferred online education to face-to-face education. It was found that the majority of the participants (37.2%) thought that the amount of online education in the future curriculum should be in the range of 0-25%, regardless of the pandemic. Conclusion Although students' perceptions and evaluations of online courses were found to be positive, they prefer face-to-face education.

Keywords

• Dental students
• Learning level
• Online learning
• Orthodontic education
• Undergraduate

References

1. Moore JL, Dickson-Deane C, Galyen K. e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: are they the same? Internet High Educ. 2011;14(2):129-35.
2. Hillenburg KL, Cederberg RA, Gray SA, Hurst CL, Johnson GK, Potter BJ. E-learning and the future of dental education: opinions of administrators and information technology specialists. Eur J Dent Educ. 2006;10:169–77.
3. Adeoye I, Adanikin A, Adanikin A. COVID-19 and E-Learning: Nigeria Tertiary Education System Experience. Int. J. Res. Innov. Appl. Sci. 2020; 5: 28–31.
4. Peng X, Xu X, Li Y, Cheng L, Zhou X, Ren B. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-0075-9.
5. Sweet J, Pugsley L, Wilson J. Stakeholder perceptions of chairside teaching and learning in one UK dental school. Br Dent J. 2008; 205:499– 503. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.934.
6. Ebner M, Schön S, Braun C, Ebner M, Grigoriadis Y, Haas M, Leitner P, Taraghi B. COVID-19 Epidemic as E-Learning Boost? Chronological Development and Effects at an Austrian University against the Background of the Concept of “E-Learning Readiness”. Future Internet. 2020;12:94.
7. Haden NK, Hendrickson WD, Kassebaum DK, Ranney RR, Weinstein G, Anderson EL, et al. Curriculum changes in dental education, 2003–09. J Dent Educ. 2010; 74(5):539–57.
8. Ruiz JG, Mintzer, MJ, Leipzig, RM. The Impact of E-Learning in Medical Education. Acad. Med. 2006; 81, 207–212.

9. Cook DA. Web-based learning: pros, cons, and controversies. Clin Med. 2007;7:37–42
10. de Jong N, Verstegen DL, Tan FS, O’Connor SJ. A comparison of classroom and online asynchronous problem-based learning for students undertaking statistics training as part of a public health master’s degree. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013; 18(2):245–64.
11. Gaupp R, Körner M, Fabry G. Effects of a case-based interactive e-learning course on knowledge and attitudes about patient safety: a quasiexperimental study with third-year medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16(1):172.
12. Zheng M, Bender D, Reid L, Milani J. An interactive online approach to teaching evidence-based dentistry with Web 2.0 technology. J Dent Educ. 2017; 81(8): 995–1003.
13. Nold E, Demeter V, Erdelt KJ, Edelhoff D, Liebermann A. Dental education during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany – cross-sectional lecturer-side evaluation for the application of digital teaching concepts F1000Research. 2022;11:767.
14. Istadi Y, RaharjoTJ , Azam M , Mulyono SE. Academic Performance in Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review. Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2022; 13:1423-38.
15. Linjawi AI, Alfadda LS. Students’ perception, attitudes, and readiness toward online learning in dental education in Saudi Arabia: a cohort study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:855–63.
16. Elgreatly A, Mahrous A. Enhancing student learning in dental anatomy by using virtual three-dimensional models. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(3):269-71. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13152
17. Mahrous A, Schneider GB. Enhancing student learning of removable prosthodontics using the latest advancements in virtual 3D modeling. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(4):471-472.
18. Qutieshat AS, Abusamak MO, Maragha TN. Impact of blended learning on dental students’ performance and satisfaction in clinical education. J Dent Educ. 2020;84(2):135–142.
19. Maresca C, Barrero C, Duggan D, et al. Utilization of blended learning to teach preclinical endodontics. J Dent Educ. 2014;78(8):1194–204.