Research Article

A bibliometric review on spatial ability studies in education

Number: 53 June 30, 2024
EN TR

A bibliometric review on spatial ability studies in education

Abstract

In the current study, it is aimed to bibliometrically examine the published scientific documents on spatial ability in the field of education. Within the scope of the research, a scan was performed using the formula -“spatial abil*” and “educat*”- in the Web of Science (WoS) database. VOSviewer program has been used in the analysis of the data. As a result of the analysis, 1317 scientific studies published between 1975-2022 were reached. The first study published in WoS in the related subject area belongs to the year 1984. The most publications on the concept of spatial ability, which began to gain popularity as of the 2000s, were produced in 2020. The country that produces the most publications, has the strongest relationship network and receives the most citations is the USA. The organization with the strongest relationship network is Tomsk State University, the organization with the most publications is La Laguna University, and the organization with the most citations is Vanderbilt University. The scientific document with the strongest relationship network and the most cited is Wai et al. (2009). The scientific resource with the strongest citation relationship and the highest number of citations is the Journal of Educational Psychology

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis , Collaboration , Education , Network analysis , Spatial ability

References

  1. Agbo, F. J., Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., & Suhonen, J. (2021). Application of virtual reality in computer science education: A systemic review based on bibliometric and content analysis methods. Education Sciences, 11(3), 142-165. doi: 10.3390/educsci11030142
  2. Al, U. (2008). Türkiye’nin bilimsel yayın politikası: Atıf dizinlerine dayalı bibliyometrik bir yaklaşım (Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara. Ariel, R., Lembeck, N. A., Moffat, S., & Hertzog, C. (2018). Are there sex differences in confidence and metacognitive monitoring accuracy for every day, academic, and psychometrically measured spatial ability? Intelligence, 70, 42–51. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.08.001
  3. Bangirana, P., Menk, J., John, C. C., Boivin, M. J., & Hodges, J. S. (2013). The association between cognition and academic performance in Ugandan children surviving malaria with neurological involvement. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e55653. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055653
  4. Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20(5-6), 327–344. doi:10.1007/bf00287729
  5. Caci, B., Chiazzese, G., & D’Amico, A. (2013). Robotic and virtual world programming labs to stimulate reasoning and visual-spatial abilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1493–1497. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.070
  6. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Chao, C. C., Yang, J. M., ve Jen, W. Y. (2007). Determining technology trends and forecasts of RFID by a historical review and bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2005. Technovation, 27(5), 268-279. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.09.003
  8. * Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9
  9. Di, X., & Zheng, X. (2022). A meta-analysis of the impact of virtual technologies on students’ spatial ability. Educational technology research and development, 70(1), 73-98.
  10. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., & Harman, H. H. (1979). Cognitive factors: Their identification and replication. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 79(2), 3-84.
APA
Yıldızhan Kökten, B., & Ertekin, E. (2024). A bibliometric review on spatial ability studies in education. Educational Academic Research, 53, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1421882