Research Article

Teacher Candidates' Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education

Number: 56 March 11, 2025
TR EN

Teacher Candidates' Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education

Abstract

In this research, the aim was to examine the opinions of teacher candidates in the Painting-Teaching Program of Education Faculties, Fine Arts Education Department, on the "Basic Competence Test" exam score requirement to enter the Painting-Teaching Program and formation training. This research was designed within the scope of qualitative research, and data was collected through face-to-face individual semi-structured interviews. In the data collection phase of the research, teacher candidates at different class levels studying in the Painting-Teaching program of the Fine Arts Education Department at a state university were selected as the study group through a non-random non-probability sampling method, convenience sampling. The data obtained from the interviews were analyzed using content analysis, and the findings are presented in tables. Participants' opinions were supported by direct quotations in the tables. The most striking finding of this study is that teacher candidates believe that the 800 thousand threshold should be applied. However, teacher candidates are opposed to formation training. Therefore, it is recommended that the requirement to enter the 800 thousand threshold should also be applied to candidates receiving formation training.

Keywords

Basic competence test threshold score, pedagogical formation education, fine arts education, teacher candidate.

Ethical Statement

Etik kurul belgemi sisteme yüklemiştir

References

  1. Atik, A., & Kasapoğlu Tankutay, H. (2023). A study of teachers' opinions on the abolition of the minimum passing score in the higher education ınstitutions examination. İnönü University Faculty of Education Journal, 24(3),1554–1570. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1219450
  2. Balkaş, G. (2020). A study on the relationship between child and art (Unpublished master's thesis). Kirikkale University, Institute of Social Sciences.
  3. Başbuğ, Ç., & Kaya, A. (2022). The effects of the success rankıng of basıc profıcıency test ın specıal talent selectıon exam for musıc educatıon program. Trakya Journal of Education, 12(3), 1356–1371. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.979210
  4. Buyurgan, S., & Buyurgan, U. (2020). Arts education and training. Pegem A Publishing.
  5. Chmiliar, L. (2010). Multiple-case designs. In A. J. Mills, G. Eurepas, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 582-583). SAGE Publications.
  6. Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2015). Framing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, part II. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 7–20.
  7. Council of Higher Education. (2019, May) Higher education institutions exam (YKS) higher education programs and quotas guide. Measurement, Selection and Placement Center. https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2019/YKS/kontkilavuz_18072019.pdf
  8. Council of Higher Education. (2020, June) Higher education institutions exam (YKS) higher education programs and quotas guide. Measurement, Selection and Placement Center. https://www.osym.gov.tr/TR,19431/2020-yuksekogretim-kurumlari-sinavi-yks-yuksekogretim-programlari-ve-kontenjanlari-kilavuzu.html
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  10. Çetin, Ş. (2000). A research on the ideal teacher. The Journal of National Education, 149, 23–37. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47.
APA
Öztürk, E., Keleş, B., & Dinç Altun, Z. (2025). Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education. Educational Academic Research, 56, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1487599
AMA
1.Öztürk E, Keleş B, Dinç Altun Z. Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education. Educational Academic Research. 2025;(56):18-28. doi:10.33418/education.1487599
Chicago
Öztürk, Edanur, Büşra Keleş, and Zühal Dinç Altun. 2025. “Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education”. Educational Academic Research, nos. 56: 18-28. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1487599.
EndNote
Öztürk E, Keleş B, Dinç Altun Z (March 1, 2025) Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education. Educational Academic Research 56 18–28.
IEEE
[1]E. Öztürk, B. Keleş, and Z. Dinç Altun, “Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education”, Educational Academic Research, no. 56, pp. 18–28, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.33418/education.1487599.
ISNAD
Öztürk, Edanur - Keleş, Büşra - Dinç Altun, Zühal. “Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education”. Educational Academic Research. 56 (March 1, 2025): 18-28. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1487599.
JAMA
1.Öztürk E, Keleş B, Dinç Altun Z. Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education. Educational Academic Research. 2025;:18–28.
MLA
Öztürk, Edanur, et al. “Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education”. Educational Academic Research, no. 56, Mar. 2025, pp. 18-28, doi:10.33418/education.1487599.
Vancouver
1.Edanur Öztürk, Büşra Keleş, Zühal Dinç Altun. Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on the Threshold Score and Formation Training in the Department of Fine Arts Education. Educational Academic Research. 2025 Mar. 1;(56):18-2. doi:10.33418/education.1487599