Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis

Number: 59 December 12, 2025
TR EN

Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

This research was conducted to analyze the application, utilization or use of brainstorming technique in the education field. The aim of this study is to examine the studies published on the brainstorming technique with bibliometric analysis and to determine and evaluate the publications, trends, citation relationships etc. followed in this field. Bibliometric analysis is used to identify the current status of research and the critical points in bibliometric data mapping can help predict future research trends so it is aimed to benefit scientists doing research in these fields and to produce usable data by providing statistical information on the basis of publications, authors, sources, institutions and countries. Therefore, it is given the general, conceptual, intellectual and social structure of brainstorming technique in the study. In this context, 305 articles on the brainstorming technique published in the WoS database between 1981 and 2022 were analyzed through the R program. According to the analysis results, 803 authors used the brainstorming technique in their research in 218 different journals. Additionally, an average of 9.06 publications were made annually and 15.14 citations per article were made to these publications annually. Among these studies, the author who published the most on the brainstorming technique was Paulus PB. Creativity Research Journal has the most articles published, with 14 publications. In terms of countries, the most publications were made in the United States of America.

Keywords

Bibliometric Analysis, Brainstorming, Social Network Analysis, Trends, Education

References

  1. Abumalloh, R. A., Nilashi, M., Ismail, M. Y., Alhargan, A., Alghamdi, A., Alzahrani, A. O., Saraireh, L., Osman, R., & Asadi, S. (2022). Medical image processing and Covid-19: a literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 15, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.11.013
  2. Aini, S. D. (2022). Methods of the influence of brainstorming learning on student learning outcomes. The Ellite of Unira, 5 (2).
  3. Al, U. (2008). Evaluation of scientific publications: h-index and Turkey’s performance. Information World, 9(2), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2008.307
  4. Al-Bayati, A. H., & Mizban, A. J. (2022). The effectiveness of brainstorming in the achievement of fourth-grade students in science. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(5), 1506 -1520.
  5. Alrubai, F. H. (2014). The Effectiveness of the brainstorming technique toward enhancing creative and critical thinking skills among secondary Iraqi physics students. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur.
  6. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  7. Asadi, S., & Dahlan, H. M. (2017). Organizational research in the feld of Green IT: a systematic literature review from 2007 to 2016. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 1191–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.009
  8. Barker, A. & Barker, G. (1997). Beyond brainstorming where to go from here. Direction The Learning Consultancy. Bellia, C., Bacarella, S., & Ingrassia, M. (2022). Interactions between street food and food safety topics in the scientific literature—a bibliometric analysis with science mapping. Foods, 11, 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060789
  9. Benckendorff, P. (2009). Themes and trends in Australian and New Zealand tourism research: a social network analysis of citations in two leading journals (1994–2007). Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1375/jhtm.16.1.1
  10. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R. & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Are there better iındices for evaluation purposes than the h ındex? a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 830-837. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20806
APA
İnciman Çelik, T., & Akay, C. (2025). Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Academic Research, 59, 182-198. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1624241
AMA
1.İnciman Çelik T, Akay C. Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Academic Research. 2025;(59):182-198. doi:10.33418/education.1624241
Chicago
İnciman Çelik, Tuğba, and Cenk Akay. 2025. “Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis”. Educational Academic Research, nos. 59: 182-98. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1624241.
EndNote
İnciman Çelik T, Akay C (December 1, 2025) Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Academic Research 59 182–198.
IEEE
[1]T. İnciman Çelik and C. Akay, “Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis”, Educational Academic Research, no. 59, pp. 182–198, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.33418/education.1624241.
ISNAD
İnciman Çelik, Tuğba - Akay, Cenk. “Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis”. Educational Academic Research. 59 (December 1, 2025): 182-198. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1624241.
JAMA
1.İnciman Çelik T, Akay C. Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Academic Research. 2025;:182–198.
MLA
İnciman Çelik, Tuğba, and Cenk Akay. “Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis”. Educational Academic Research, no. 59, Dec. 2025, pp. 182-98, doi:10.33418/education.1624241.
Vancouver
1.Tuğba İnciman Çelik, Cenk Akay. Study on Brainstorming from 1981 to 2022 in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Academic Research. 2025 Dec. 1;(59):182-98. doi:10.33418/education.1624241