Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A Review on the Impact of Organic, Conventional and Nano Fertilizer Application in Crop Production

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 101 - 109, 29.12.2022

Öz

Both organic, conventional, and nano fertilizers have advantages and disadvantages. This paper aimed to find out the three kinds of fertilizers and its efficiency in crop production and managment. However, it will also depend on some factors to consider. An example is the area of farm for crop production and the capacity of a farmer to acquire such fertilizers. Organic fertilizers are bulky to carry on the farm. These require high transportation costs when compared with synthetic fertilizers. These also lower costs and can be made locally. The slow-release of nutrients into the plants is the vital action of these fertilizers. On which this will increase the nutrient use efficiency of a plant. The nutrients are slowly distributed into the plants making them sustainable and continually. Conventional fertilizers are not bulky to carry as compared to organic fertilizers. Since these fertilizers contain a high amount of macronutrients and has fast release. Meaning the nutrients are rapidly distributed into the plants. This will lead to elemental loss through leaching, evaporation, or volatilization, and other losses which decrease the availability of these fertilizers into the plants. Similarly, this also pollutes the environment such as water, air, and soil. On the other hand, nano fertilizers are cost-effective. Only 25% is used from the recommended rate as compared with conventional fertilizers. This is also slow-release like with the organic fertilizers. This slow-release action of nano fertilizers results in higher nutrient use efficiency. When large crop plantation, nano fertilizers is suitable while smaller farms are suitable by using organic and conventional fertilizers. This strategy resulted to crop production efficiency.

Destekleyen Kurum

Visayas State University

Proje Numarası

NA

Teşekkür

Thank you.

Kaynakça

  • Abdel-Aziz, H. M. M., Soliman, M. I., Abo Al-Saoud, A. M., & El-Sherbeny, G. A. (2021). Waste-derived npk nanofertilizer enhances growth and productivity of capsicum annuum l. MPDI-Plants, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061144
  • Adegbidi, H. G., Briggs, R. D., Volk, T. A., White, E. H., & Abrahamson, L. P. (2003). Effect of organic amendments and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer on willow biomass production and soil chemical characteristics. Biomass and Bioenergy, 25(4), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00038-2
  • Assefa, S., & Tadesse, S. (2019). The Principal Role of Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and Agricultural Productivity. Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal, 22(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2019.22.556192
  • Astaneh, N., Bazrafshan, F., Zare, M., Amiri, B., & Bahrani, A. (2021). Nano-fertilizer prevents environmental pollution and improves physiological traits of wheat grown under drought stress conditions. Scientia Agropecuaria, 12(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.17268/SCI.AGROPECU.2021.005
  • Benzon, H. rose, Rubenecia, M. R., Ultra, V. U., & Lee, S. C. (2015). Nano-fertilizer affects the growth, development, and chemical properties of rice. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 7(1), 2223–7054.
  • Burhan, M. G., & AL-Hassan, S. A. (2019). Impact of nano npk fertilizers to correlation between productivity, quality and flag leaf of some bread wheat varieties. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 50(SpecialIssue), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v50ispecial.171
  • Chandini, Kumar, R., Kumar, R., & Prakash, O. (2019). The impact of chemical fertilizers on our environment and ecosystem. Research Trends in Environmental Sciences, February, 69–86.
  • Han, S. H., An, J. Y., Hwang, J., Kim, S. Bin, & Park, B. B. (2016). The effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on the growth and nutrient concentrations of yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera Lin.) in a nursery system. Forest Science and Technology, 12(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2015.1135827
  • Hassani, A., Tajali, A. A., Mazinani, S. M. H., & Hassani, M. (2015). Studying the conventional chemical fertilizers and nano-fertilizer of iron, zinc and potassium on quantitative yield of the medicinal plant of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) in Khuzestan. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 3(4), 1078–1082.
  • Janmohammadi, M., Pornour, N., Javanmard, A., & Sabaghnia, N. (2016). Effects of bio-organic, conventional and nanofertilizers on growth, yield and quality of potato in cold steppe. Botanica Lithuanica, 22(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/botlit-2016-0014
  • Kakar, K., Xuan, T. D., Noori, Z., Aryan, S., & Gulab, G. (2020). Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer application on growth, yield, and grain quality of rice. Multi-Disciplinary Publishing Institute -Agriculture, 10(11), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110544
  • Khalid, U., Sher, F., Noreen, S., Lima, E. C., Rasheed, T., Sehar, S., & Amami, R. (2021). Comparative effects of conventional and nano-enabled fertilizers on morphological and physiological attributes of Caesalpinia bonducella plants. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.06.011
  • Lin, W., Lin, M., Zhou, H., Wu, H., Li, Z., & Lin, W. (2019). The effects of chemical and organic fertilizer usage on rhizosphere soil in tea orchards. PLoS ONE, 14(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018
  • Nizamuddin, Mahmood, M. M., Farooq, K., & Riaz, S. (2003). Response of potato to Various Levels of NPK (pp. 149–151).
  • Savci, S. (2012). An Agricultural Pollutant: Chemical Fertilizer. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2012.v3.191
  • Ukoje, J., & Yusuf, R. (2013). Organic Fertilizer: The Underestimated Component in Agricultural Transformation Initiatives for Sustainable Small Holder Farming in Nigeria. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 6(6), 794. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v6i6.10s
  • Ullah, M., Islam, M., Islam, M., & Haque, T. (2008). Effects of organic manures and chemical fertilizers on the yield of brinjal and soil properties. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 6(2), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v6i2.4821
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 101 - 109, 29.12.2022

Öz

Proje Numarası

NA

Kaynakça

  • Abdel-Aziz, H. M. M., Soliman, M. I., Abo Al-Saoud, A. M., & El-Sherbeny, G. A. (2021). Waste-derived npk nanofertilizer enhances growth and productivity of capsicum annuum l. MPDI-Plants, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061144
  • Adegbidi, H. G., Briggs, R. D., Volk, T. A., White, E. H., & Abrahamson, L. P. (2003). Effect of organic amendments and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer on willow biomass production and soil chemical characteristics. Biomass and Bioenergy, 25(4), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00038-2
  • Assefa, S., & Tadesse, S. (2019). The Principal Role of Organic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and Agricultural Productivity. Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal, 22(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2019.22.556192
  • Astaneh, N., Bazrafshan, F., Zare, M., Amiri, B., & Bahrani, A. (2021). Nano-fertilizer prevents environmental pollution and improves physiological traits of wheat grown under drought stress conditions. Scientia Agropecuaria, 12(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.17268/SCI.AGROPECU.2021.005
  • Benzon, H. rose, Rubenecia, M. R., Ultra, V. U., & Lee, S. C. (2015). Nano-fertilizer affects the growth, development, and chemical properties of rice. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 7(1), 2223–7054.
  • Burhan, M. G., & AL-Hassan, S. A. (2019). Impact of nano npk fertilizers to correlation between productivity, quality and flag leaf of some bread wheat varieties. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 50(SpecialIssue), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v50ispecial.171
  • Chandini, Kumar, R., Kumar, R., & Prakash, O. (2019). The impact of chemical fertilizers on our environment and ecosystem. Research Trends in Environmental Sciences, February, 69–86.
  • Han, S. H., An, J. Y., Hwang, J., Kim, S. Bin, & Park, B. B. (2016). The effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on the growth and nutrient concentrations of yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera Lin.) in a nursery system. Forest Science and Technology, 12(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2015.1135827
  • Hassani, A., Tajali, A. A., Mazinani, S. M. H., & Hassani, M. (2015). Studying the conventional chemical fertilizers and nano-fertilizer of iron, zinc and potassium on quantitative yield of the medicinal plant of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) in Khuzestan. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 3(4), 1078–1082.
  • Janmohammadi, M., Pornour, N., Javanmard, A., & Sabaghnia, N. (2016). Effects of bio-organic, conventional and nanofertilizers on growth, yield and quality of potato in cold steppe. Botanica Lithuanica, 22(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/botlit-2016-0014
  • Kakar, K., Xuan, T. D., Noori, Z., Aryan, S., & Gulab, G. (2020). Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer application on growth, yield, and grain quality of rice. Multi-Disciplinary Publishing Institute -Agriculture, 10(11), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110544
  • Khalid, U., Sher, F., Noreen, S., Lima, E. C., Rasheed, T., Sehar, S., & Amami, R. (2021). Comparative effects of conventional and nano-enabled fertilizers on morphological and physiological attributes of Caesalpinia bonducella plants. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.06.011
  • Lin, W., Lin, M., Zhou, H., Wu, H., Li, Z., & Lin, W. (2019). The effects of chemical and organic fertilizer usage on rhizosphere soil in tea orchards. PLoS ONE, 14(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217018
  • Nizamuddin, Mahmood, M. M., Farooq, K., & Riaz, S. (2003). Response of potato to Various Levels of NPK (pp. 149–151).
  • Savci, S. (2012). An Agricultural Pollutant: Chemical Fertilizer. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2012.v3.191
  • Ukoje, J., & Yusuf, R. (2013). Organic Fertilizer: The Underestimated Component in Agricultural Transformation Initiatives for Sustainable Small Holder Farming in Nigeria. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 6(6), 794. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v6i6.10s
  • Ullah, M., Islam, M., Islam, M., & Haque, T. (2008). Effects of organic manures and chemical fertilizers on the yield of brinjal and soil properties. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 6(2), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v6i2.4821
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ziraat Mühendisliği
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Je-ar Colipano Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-4544-2844

Ulysses Cagasan

Proje Numarası NA
Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Colipano, J.-a., & Cagasan, U. (2022). A Review on the Impact of Organic, Conventional and Nano Fertilizer Application in Crop Production. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(2), 101-109.
AMA Colipano Ja, Cagasan U. A Review on the Impact of Organic, Conventional and Nano Fertilizer Application in Crop Production. EJAR. Aralık 2022;6(2):101-109.
Chicago Colipano, Je-ar, ve Ulysses Cagasan. “A Review on the Impact of Organic, Conventional and Nano Fertilizer Application in Crop Production”. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research 6, sy. 2 (Aralık 2022): 101-9.
EndNote Colipano J-a, Cagasan U (01 Aralık 2022) A Review on the Impact of Organic, Conventional and Nano Fertilizer Application in Crop Production. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research 6 2 101–109.
IEEE J.-a. Colipano ve U. Cagasan, “A Review on the Impact of Organic, Conventional and Nano Fertilizer Application in Crop Production”, EJAR, c. 6, sy. 2, ss. 101–109, 2022.
ISNAD Colipano, Je-ar - Cagasan, Ulysses. “A Review on the Impact of Organic, Conventional and Nano Fertilizer Application in Crop Production”. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research 6/2 (Aralık 2022), 101-109.
JAMA Colipano J-a, Cagasan U. A Review on the Impact of Organic, Conventional and Nano Fertilizer Application in Crop Production. EJAR. 2022;6:101–109.
MLA Colipano, Je-ar ve Ulysses Cagasan. “A Review on the Impact of Organic, Conventional and Nano Fertilizer Application in Crop Production”. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, c. 6, sy. 2, 2022, ss. 101-9.
Vancouver Colipano J-a, Cagasan U. A Review on the Impact of Organic, Conventional and Nano Fertilizer Application in Crop Production. EJAR. 2022;6(2):101-9.
Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research (EJAR)   ISSN: 2636-8226   Web: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejar   e-mail: agriculturalresearchjournal@gmail.com