Research Article

Determining the Appropriate Tool for In-Stand Debarking with Analytical Hierarchy Process

Volume: 8 Number: 2 December 30, 2022
EN

Determining the Appropriate Tool for In-Stand Debarking with Analytical Hierarchy Process

Abstract

The bark of logs from coniferous trees is mostly debarked in the stand or roadside. At the terminal points, storages, and mills industrial debarking machines have been operated for debarking of timber, as well. In recent time chainsaw mounted debarking apparatus (C-Debarker), axe, and a new tool that is brushcutter mounted debarking apparatus (B-Debarker) have been used for peeling barks in-stand. Debarking process is very time-consuming work phase within the total time for unit of wood procurement. In order to save operation time and to minimize unit costs for the operation, the logging operators have to make a difficult decision on suitable tools for debarking. The purpose of this study is to determine a procedure that helps to select the appropriate tool in-stand debarking of timber logs. In addition to the axe and C-Debarker, traditionally used in debarking, the recently developed peeling tool B-Debarker has been evaluated in terms of various criteria and compared with other methods. In multi-criteria analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been used to describe the appropriate tool. The criteria set are based on technically appropriate, economically viable, environmentally friendly, and socially acceptable debarking tool and operation. While the application potential of C-Debarker is high in terms of operational efficiency, the B-Debarker offers high potential in terms of ergonomics. On the other hand, it has been determined that the axe is a preferable tool for ease of use and accessibility.

Keywords

In-stand debarking , Debarkers , Log debarkers , Axe , Brush cutter , Technology selection , AHP

References

  1. Baroth, R. 2005. Literature review of the latest development of wood debarking. University of Oulu Control Engineering Laboratory, Report A-No: 27, 32 p.
  2. BASEH, 2022. Tree Bark Peeling Apparatus. Bahtiyar Motor Sanayi Ltd. Şti., İzmir. http://www.baseh.com/v/category/106-kabuk-soyma-aparatlari.html (Accessed: 18 November 2022)
  3. Chahal, A., Ciolkosz, D., Puri, V., Jacobson, M., Liu, J. 2021. Mechanical characteristics of wood-bark interface of shrub willow. Industrial Crops & Products, 162: 113236
  4. Çağlar, S. 2021. Work efficiency and physical workload during the manual debarking of Scotch pine trees. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 32(3): 246-255.
  5. Eker, M. 2004. Development of Annual Operational Planning Model for Timber Harvesting. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trabzon, p. 239.
  6. Eker, M., Çoban, H. O., Acar, H.H. 2011. Time study and productivity analysis of chainsaw mounted log debarker in southern pine forests of Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 2146-2156.
  7. Eker, M., Özer, D. 2015. Selection of debarking technique for pine logs in cut-to-length harvesting method. Proceedings of the 48th International FORMEC Symposium: 4-8 October, Linz, Austria, pp.123-128.
  8. Eker, M., Çoban, H. O. 2019. The Relationship Between Forest Operations and Climate Change. International Conferences on Climate Change and Forestry, November 13-14, Antalya, Türkiye.
  9. Eker, M., Şefik, M., 2019. Developing and testing of a debarking tool (moto-debarker) mounted to brushcutter. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 20(4): 411-420.
  10. Enez, K., Nalbantoğlu, S.S. 2019. Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from OWAS and REBA in forestry timber harvesting. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 70: 51-57.
APA
Eker, M. (2022). Determining the Appropriate Tool for In-Stand Debarking with Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Forest Engineering, 8(2), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1216881