Comparison of Ergonomic Risk Analysis Methods for Working Postures of Forest Nursery Workers

Year 2019, , 18 - 24, 29.06.2019

Derya Yaylı Erhan Çalışkan

https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.556997

Cited By: 4

Abstract

The
chores of forest nursey workers are comprised of manual labor based on the
physical structure of the worker. Long term working postures repeated
throughout the shift results in strains at various levels in the body of the
worker thereby having adverse impacts on their performances. There are various
methods developed in literature for ergonomic risk assessment. The purpose of
this study was to examine the working postures of nursery workers working at
the Bayburt and Hendek forest nurseries and to analyze problematic working
postures using the ergonomic risk analysis methods of OWAS (Owako Working position Analysis System), REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment), and RULA (Rapid
Upper Limbs Assessment) the reliabilities of which have been proven in literature.
This result reveals that hazardous and very hazardous ratios
in working postures were 4.6%, 8%, 20% in OWAS, REBA, and RULA methods,
respectively. Based on the opinion that the method
yielding greater risks is more sensitive for eliminating the risks in the
shortest amount of time, it can be put forth that the RULA method gave more
sensitive results in comparison with the OWAS and REBA methods. 

Keywords

Forest, Nursery worker, Ergonomic, OWAS, REBA, RULA

References

• Acar, H.H., Eroğlu, H., 2001. Research on Health Problems in Wood Production and Nursery-Afforestation Workers in Forestry, 8. National Ergonomics Congress, 25-26 October, p.8-14, İzmir.
• Anas, A., Qutubuddin, S.M., Hebbal, S.S., Kumar, A.C.S., 2012. An Ergonomic Study of Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among the Workers Working in Typical Indian Saw Mills. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 3(9):38-45.
• Anonim, 2014. Observation-Based Posture Assessment Review of Current Practice and Recommendations for Improvement. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. USA, 32p.
• Ayan, B., 2015. Ergonomic Risk Factors Investigation in Assembly Line: An Application in the Automotive Industry. Ministry of Labour and Social Security, Centre for Labour and Social Security Training and Research, Thesis. Ankara. 109 s.
• Calvo, A., 2009. Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSD) Risks in Forestry: A Case Study to Suggest an Ergonomic Analysis. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 11(4):1-9.
• Chang S. W., Wang M.J., 2007. Digital Human Modeling and Workplace Evaluation: Using an Automobile Assembly Task as an Example. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries, 17(5):445-455.
• Curtis, V., 1994. Women and the Transport of Water. London, IT Publications.
• Çalışkan, E., 2016. Comparison of Workers Timber Harvesting in Ergonomic Risk Assesment Methodology, International Conference on Safetry&Health, 8-11 May, Abstracts Book s.137, İstanbul Turkey.
• Dockrell, S., O’Grady, E., Bennett, K., Mullarkey, C., Mc Connell, R., Ruddy, R., Twomey, S., Flannery, C., 2012. An Investigation of the Reliability of Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) as a Method of Assessment of Children’s Computing Posture, Applied Ergonomics, 43:632-636.
• Enez, K., Nalbantoğlu, S.S., 2015. Forestry Activities Evaluation of the Method in terms of REBA. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 3(3):127-131.
• Erdaş, O., Acar, H., 1995. Occupational health in forest workers in the Eastern Black Sea region, 5. National Ergonomics Congress, İstanbul, p:312-322.
• Gallis, C., 2006. Work-related prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among Greek forest workers. Int. J. Indust. Ergon. 36:731-736.
• Gangopadhyay, S., Das, B., Das, T., Ghoshal, G., 2005. An Ergonomic Study on Posture-Related Discomfort Among Preadolescent Agricultural Workers of West Bengal, India, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 11(3):315-322.
• Hansson, J.E., 1990. Ergonomic Design of Large Forestry Machines, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 5(3):255-266.
• Harstela, P., 1990. Work Postures and Strain of Workers in Nordic Forest Work: A Selective Review. Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 5(3):219-226.
• Hignett, S., McAtamney, L., 2000. Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics. 31:201- 205.
• Hoy, J., Mubarak, N., Nelson, S., Sweerts de Landas, M., Magnusson, M., Okunribido, O., Pope, M., 2005. Whole Body Vibration and Posture as Risk Factors for Low Back Pain Among Forklift Truck Drivers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 284:933-946.
• Jafry, T., O’Neill, D.H., 2000. The application of ergonomics in rural development: a review. Applied Ergonomics, 31(3):263-268.
• Karhu, O., Harkonen, R., Sorvali, P., Vepsalainen, P., 1981. Observing working postures in industry: Examples of OWAS application. Applied Ergonomics, 12(4): 13-17.
• Kaya, A., 2016. Evaluation of Some Anthropometric Characteristics and Working Postures in Female Forest Nursery Workers. Master Thesis. Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon. 123 s.
• Kır İ., 2016. Evaluation of Ergonomic Risks Faced by Employees in Greenhouse Sector in Adana and Mersin Region. Ministry of Labor and Social Security, General Directorate of Occupational Health and Safety, Ankara. 87 s.
• MctAmney L., Corlett E.N., 1993. RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders, Appl Ergon., 24 (2):91-99.
• Melemez, K., Tunay, M., Fevzi, Ç., Tuna, E., 2012. A Case Study on Health Examinations of Forest Workers in Forest Harvesting Works. Bartın Faculty of Forestry Journal, 14(21):37-46.
• Saraji, J.N., Hassanzadeh, M.A., Pourmahabadian, M., Shahtaheri, S.J., 2004. Evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders risk factors among the crew of the İranian ports and shipping organization’s vessels. Acta Medica Iranica, 42(5):350-354.
• Ulker, O., Burdurlu, E., 2012. Analysis of Postural Load During Tasks in Some Machines Related to Panel Furniture Production By Using The OVAKO Working Posture Analyzing System (OWAS). Kastamonu Univ.,Journal of ForestryFaculty, 12 (2):291-300.
• Ünver Okan, S., Kaya, A., 2015. Analysis of the Working Postures with Reba Method for the Repikaj Works in Nursery. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 3(3):157-163.
• Ünver Okan, S., Acar,H.H., Kaya, A., 2017. Determination of Work Postures with Different Ergonomic Risk Assessment Methods in Forest Nurseries, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26(12):7362-7371.