Efficiency Comparison of Mechanization Techniques in Nursery

Year 2019, , 68 - 76, 21.12.2019

Tugrul Varol , Halil Barış Özel , Tuna Emir , Recep Özdil

https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.581652

Cited By: 2

Abstract

In this
study, the five-stage mechanization techniques applied in the production of
seedlings at the Gökçebey Nursery Department were compared with the activities
carried out using manpower. These stages are soil tillage, preparation of
seeding beds, sowing, maintenance of seedlings and uprooting of seedlings.
During the production of seedlings of 2 + 0 aged, Tefen origin in Gökçebey
nursery, unit time analyzes were performed with 30 replicates. The most
efficient activity in terms of manpower was the preparation of pillows with
60%, followed by tillage (84), maintenance (59%), seedling (52%), planting
(46%), and tillage (39%). Furthermore, the economics of mechanization according
to manpower was examined by Break-even analysis. According to the results, it
was determined that machine operation is more economical in case of carrying
out 157 soil cultivation annually, preparing 158 seeding beds, planting 310
seeding beds, performing maintenance on 218 seeding beds and performing
seedling dismantling activities in 182 seeding bedsowing cushions. According to
the examinations and evaluations made, the use of appropriate mechanization
techniques positively affected and supported the nursery production activities
because of the fact that it ensured shorter time, healthier and lower costs,
production with a minimum loss, and uninterrupted production. Utilization of
appropriate mechanization techniques determined in accordance with the
necessary criteria at the seedling production stages and rehabilitation works
in order to ensure the contribution to the forest areas, which are now
destroyed due to various reasons, to the national economy, and to realize the
forestry policies and targets in a timely manner, will always increase the
success, and it will create an important opportunity for preventing a
significant portion of occupational accidents that emerge while applying
classical methods.

Keywords

Nursery, mechanization, manpower, seeding bed, soil tillage

Supporting Institution

Bartın University

Project Number

2017-FEN-CY-017

Thanks

This research was supported by Bartın University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit with 2017-FEN-CY-017 project number.

References

• Aldhous, J.R., Mason, W.L., 1994. Forest Nursery Practice. Forestry Commission Bulletin No. 111. Londan, UK. 268 p.
• Anonymous, 2019. https://zonguldakobm. ogm.gov.tr/GökçebeyOFM/Sayfalar/default.aspx.
• Bamsey, C., 1985. Silvicultural equipment used by the Alberta Forest Service. Information report NOR-X-series. Northern Forest Research Centre. Canada.
• Blanke, M. M., 2010. Managing open field production of perennial horticultural crops with technological innovations. In XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): Colloquia and Overview 916: 121-128.
• Borz, S. A., Ignea, G., Popa, B., Spârchez, G., Iordache, E., 2015. Estimating time consumption and productivity of roundwood skidding in group shelterwood system–a case study in a broadleaved mixed stand located in reduced accessibility conditions. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering: Journal for Theory and Application of Forestry Engineering, 36(1):137-146.
• Ersson, B.T., 2010. Possible concepts for mechanized tree planting in southern Sweden, An Introductory Essay on Forest Technology. ISRN SLU–SRG–AR–269–SE. Umea. 51 p.
• Ersson, B.T., 2014. Concepts for mechanized tree planting in southern Sweden, Doctoral Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Umea, Sweden. 76 p.
• Ersson, B.T., Bergsten, U., Lindroos, O., 2014. Reloading mechanized tree planting devices faster using a seedling tray carousel. Silva Fennica 48(2), 14 p. ISSN: 0037-5330.
• Ersson, B. T., Laine, T., Saksa, T., 2018. Mechanized tree planting in Sweden and Finland: Current state and key factors for future growth. Forests, 9(7):370. Elashry, E. R., 1983. Methods of seed-bed preparation in Egypt. In Agricultural Mechanization conference, arranged by DAAD vol. 1, 8 p. Alex, Egypt.
• Gammoh, I.A., 2011. Double fur row with raised bed—A new improved mechanized water-harvesting technique for large-scale rehabilitation of arid rain-fed areas, Soil&Tillage Research, 113: 61-69.
• Gleed, J. A., 1967. Mechanization in a forest nursery. NZJ For, 12(2):174-182.
• Güner, S., Comez, A., Karatas, R., Genc, M., 2013.[The Effect of Seedbed Density on the Field Performance of Anatolian Black Pine Seedlings, Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Forestry, 62(2):89-96.
• Hormozi, M.A., Asoodar, M.A., Abdeshahi, A., 2012. Impact of mechanization on technical efficiency: A case study of rice farmers in Iran. Procedia Economics and Finance, 1:176-185.
• Kelly, L.A., Wentworth, T.R., 2009. Effects of mechanized pine straw raking on population densities of longleaf pine seedlings, Forest Ecology and Management 259:1-7.
• Khobragade, B. V., Bokade, N. A., Jadhavrao, K. S., Chaudhari, M. S., 2011. Feasibility testing of tractor operated seed drill for sowing sorghum. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 4(2):176-178.
• Laine, T, 2017. Mechanized tree planting in Finland and improving its productivity. Academic dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki, 48 p.
• Li, Z., Ma, X., Xie, J., Chen, G., Zhen, Z., Tan, Y., & Huang, Y. (2014). Experiment on precision seedling raising and mechanized transplanting of hybrid rice under low sowing rate in double cropping area. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(6):17-27.
• Liegel, L.H., Venator, C.R., 1987. A technical guide for forest nursery management in the Caribbean and Latin America. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-67. New Orleans, LA: US Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 156 p.
• Narang, M. K., Chandel, R., Goyal, R., Singh, D. P., Tiwana, U. S., Thakur, S. S., 2016. Comparative field evaluation of different mechanized planting techniques in Napier-Bajra. Scientific Journal Agricultural Engineering, XLI(2): 31-40.
• Odabasi, T., 2004. Silvikültür Tekniği. [Silviculture Technique], Publication of Istanbul University Faculty of Forestry, I.U. Publication No: 4459, O.F. Publication No: 475, Istanbul.
• Osmolovskiy, M. K., Granik, A. M., 2014. Technological advancement of saplings growth in a forest nursery. Proceedings of BSTU. Forestry, 2014(1):79-82.
• Ürgenç, S., 1998. General Plantation and Afforestation Techniques. Publication of Istanbul University. Faculty of Forestry, 407:509.
• Varol, T., 1997. The Investigation of Loading, Unloading and Stacking Operations in Forest Transportation In Terms of Time, Capacity and Cost In Western Black Sea Region, Master's thesis, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, 185 p.
• Varol, T., Özel, H. B., 2015. The Efficiency of Mechanization in Weed Control in Artificial Regeneration of Oriental Beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky.). World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering, 9(1):18-21.
• Visser, R., Spinelli, R., 2012. Determining the shape of the productivity function for mechanized felling and felling processing. Journal of Forest Research, 17(5):397-402.
• Wang, R., Cheng, T., Hu, L., 2015. Effect of wide-narrow row arrangement and plant density on yield and radiation use efficiency of mechanized direct-seeded canola in Central China, Field Crops Research, 172: 42-52.