A Review on Decision Processes for Wood Harvesting in Turkish Forestry

Year 2020, , 41 - 51, 26.06.2020

Mehmet Eker

https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.739789

Cited By: 2

Abstract

This review article provides an overview of decision-making processes for harvesting of wood based forest products, which should include criteria that are environmentally friendly, technically feasible, economically viable, socially and institutionally acceptable. The decision-making on wood harvesting is a complex task that requires supporting management strategies for, not only satisfy socio-economic expectations but also handle environmental considerations. The changing paradigms and developing technologies related to forestry have a significantly impact on the contents of the decisions. In order to measure and evaluate the effectiveness of the decisions, it is necessary to analyze the issues taken into consideration and focused in decision making processes. The aim of the article was to demonstrate the state-of-the-art of the decision making processes in Turkish forestry and review the contents of decisions in terms of adaptation to changing forestry operations management and technologies. Depending on the current status, the decision process related to wood harvesting system was firstly divided into two sub-process as managerial (administrative) and operational (technical), and then, each process was separately analyzed. To analyze managerial process in forest administrations, it was used a job analysis method by following of hierarchical and ordinary the paper-work procedure. For analysis of operational process, process mapping and work flowcharts were used by means of work study methods belonging to previous researches. It was found that the decisions were economical oriented (budget balanced) and societal sophisticated in administrative process. In the operational step, the harvest operations were based on technical and economic completion with basic and to moderate technologies. Environmental issues were not completely prioritized as a primary subject in any of the decision-making processes, yet.

Keywords

Wood harvesting, Managerial process, Operational decisions, Decision-making process, Job analysis method, Turkish forestry

References

• Acar, N., 2001. Production Planning Methods and Applications, MPM (National Productivity Centre) Publications No:280, 215 p., Ankara, Turkey.
• Acar, H. H., Eroğlu, H., 2003. Extraction with Fiberglass Log Chute. Karadeniz Technical University, Report of Project No: 22.113.001-2, Trabzon, Turkey.
• Akay, A.E., 2005. Using farm tractors in small-scale forest harvesting operations. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 1(2): 196-199.
• Akay, A.E., Özkan, D., Bilici, E., 2016. Assessing productivity and work safety of a mechanized logging operation. The International Forestry Symposium (IFS 2016). 7-11 December, Kastamonu, Turkey.
• Alkan, H., Eker, M., 2005. A narrow view to the sustainability of utilizing forest resources. Proceedings of Chamber of Forest Engineers Symposium, 22-24 December, Antalya, Turkey. pp: 423-437.
• Aust, W. M., Blinn, C. R., 2004. Forestry best management practices for timber harvesting and site preparation in the Eastern United States: An overview of water quality and productivity research during the past 20 years (1982–2002). Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus, 4: 5–36.
• Berg, S., 1995. The environmental load of fossil fuels in Swedish forestry-an inventory for a LCA. Life-Cycle Analysis-a Challenge for Forestry and Forest Industry, EFI Proceedings (Ed. by Frühwald and Solberg, B.) No:8, 57-65.
• Bilici, E., Akay, A.E., Abbas, D., 2017. An evaluation of a fully mechanized forest harvesting operation in Bursa, Turkey. ISFOR 2017 International Symposium on New Horizons in Forestry. 18-20 October, Isparta, Turkey.
• Cavalli, R., 2015. Forest operations in steep terrain. Forest Engineering Conference - CROJFE 2015, 18-20 March 2015, Zagreb, Croatia.
• Dykstra, D.P. and Heinrich, R., 1996. FAO Model Code of Forest Harvesting Practice. FAO Publications, 85 p., Rome, Italy.
• Eker, M., 2004. Development of Annual Operational Planning Model for Timber Harvesting. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. 239 p.
• Eker, M., Acar, H.H., 2004. A review on the log wizard using in terms of forest workmanship, X. Ergonomic Congress, Uludağ University, 08-10 October, Bursa, Turkey.
• Eker, M., 2005. A Research on the Logistics Design for Turkish Wood Supply Chain Management. Individual Research Project with Tunca, M.Z., Sütçü, A., Alkan, H., Uysal, S., SDÜ-APYB-Project No: 1087-m-05, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
• Eker, M., Acar, H.H., 2006. Operational Planning in Wood Harvesting. SDU-Faculty of Forestry Journal, A(2): 128-140
• Eker, M., Özer, D., 2015. Precision forestry in forest harvesting: Conceptual framework. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 16(2):183-194.
• Eker, M., 2016. Life cycle inventory in wood harvesting for sensitive forest operations. 1st International Symposium of Forest Engineering and Technologies-FETEC 2016, 2-4 June, Bursa, Turkey. Book of Abstracts, p. 31.
• Eker, M., Çoban, H.O., 2017. Forestry operations in the context of changing paradigms and developing technology. IV. National Forestry Congress, The Foresters’ Association of Turkey, 15-16 November, Antalya, Turkey.
• Eker, M., Önal, Y.E., 2017. Life cycle assessment for wood harvesting in Turkish forestry conditions. Proceedings of International Symposium on New Horizons in Forestry, 18-20 October, Isparta, Turkey. p. 431.
• Eker, M., Çoban, H.O., 2019. The relationship between forest operations and climate change. Proceedings of the Conference on Climate Change and Forestry. 13-14 Nov., Antalya, pp: 260-268.
• Elias, G. A., Kartawinata, K.M., Klassen, A., 2001. Reduced Impact Logging Guidelines for Indonesia, CIFOR, Bogor-Indonesia.
• Enez, K., Arıcak, B., 2012. Evaluation of the technical and working conditions of the tree harvester, KSU J. Engineering Sci., Special Issue, I: 108-114.
• Erdaş, O., Acar, H.H., Eker, M., 2014. Transportation Techniques for Forest Products. Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Forestry, No:233/39, Trabzon, Turkey. p. 504.
• FAO, 1982. Basic Technology in Forest Operation, FAO Forestry Paper No: 31, Rome, Italy.
• FS,2020. Forestry Statistics, Official Statistics, General Directorate of Forestry. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Sayfalar/Istatistikler. Accessed: 10 April 2020.
• Türker, A., Geray, A. U., Yılmaz, E., 2001. A different approach to functional (functional) planning Forest Engineering Journal, 38(3): 19-23, Ankara, Turkey.
• GDF, 1996. Official Inspection about Harvesting of Main Forest Products-No.288. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara, Turkey.
• GDF, 2019. Strategic Plan (2019-2023) of General Directorate of Forestry. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Ankara, Turkey. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/StratejikPlan/
• GDF, 2020. Official Communique about Harvesting of Wood-based Forest Products – No:310. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara, Turkey. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Tebligler Accessed: 13 February 2020.
• Heinimann, H.R., 1999. Forest Operations Under Mountainous Conditions, Forests in Sustainable Development, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. 7p.
• Heinimann, R.H., 2007. Forest operations engineering and management, the ways behind and ahead of scientific discipline. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 28 (1): 107-121.
• IFC, 2007. Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines – Forest Harvesting Operations. International Finance Corporation World Bank Group, April 30, 21 p.
• ILO, 1998. Safety and Health in Forestry Work: An ILO Code of Practice. ILO, Geneva, 166 p.
• IUFRO, 2017. Scientific Divisions, Division 3 - Forest Operations Engineering and Management. https://www.iufro.org/science/divisions/division-3/ Access:15 July 2017.
• Kovacsova, P., Antalova, M, 2010. Precision forestry – definition and technologies. Šumarski list br. 11-12, CXXXIV (2010): 603-611.
• Odabaşı, T., Özalp, G., 1994. Operation methods of forests and understanding of forestry suitable for nature. İstanbul University Faculty of Forestry Journal – B, 44(1-2):35-47.
• Öncer, M., 1991. Production Planning and Control in Forest Product Industry. MPM Publication No: 443, 72p.
• Özçelik, K., 2013. Investigation of decision-making process on harvest operations in the context of environmentally sensitive forestry. MSc. thesis, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
• Paivinen, R. and Lindner, M., 2006. Assessment Sustainability of Forest Wood-Chains. EFI Technical Report-23, European Forest Institute, 13 p.
• Şafak, İ., Eker, M., Erdem, M., Turan, İ., 2019. Time and motion analysis on cable skidding with agricultural tractors of coniferous logs. Turkish Journal of Forestry Research, 6(1): 58-47.
• World Bank, 2017. Forest Policy Note-TURKEY, World Bank Group, 112 p.