Yıl 2022,
Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 18 - 20, 30.12.2022
Alparslan Esen
,
Gökhan Gürses
Kaynakça
- 1. Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous
jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17: 232–236.
- 2. Chiapasco M1, Brusati R, Ronchi P. Le Fort I osteotomy
with interpositional bone grafts and delayed oral implants
for the rehabilitation of extremely atrophied maxillae:
a 1-9-year clinical follow-up study on humans. Clin Oral
Implants Res. 2007 Feb;18(1):74-85.
- 3. Isaksson S, Ekfeldt A, Alberius P, Blomqvist JE. Early
results from reconstruction of severely atrophic (Class
VI) maxillas by immediate endosseous implants in
conjunction with bone grafting and Le Fort I osteotomy. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;22: 144–148.
- 4. Cawood JI, Stoelinga PJW, Brouns JJA. Reconstruction
of the severely resorbed (Class VI) maxilla. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 1994;23: 219–225.
- 5. Kahnberg KE, Nilsson P, Rasmusson L. Le Fort I
osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts and implants
for rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla: a
2-stage procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:
571–578.
- 6. Precious DS, Morrison A, Richard D. Pterygomaxillary
separation without the use of osteotome. J Oral Maxillofac
Surg 1991;49:98 –9.
- 7. Jensen OT, Leopardi A, Gallegos L. The case for bone graft
reconstruction including sinus grafting and distraction
osteogenesis for the atrophic edentulous maxilla. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62: 1423–1428.
- 8. Ferri J, Dujoncquoy J-P, Carneiro JM, Raoul G. Maxillary
reconstruction to enable implant insertion: a retrospective
study of 181 patients. Head Face Med. 2008;4: 31.
- 9. Shirota T, Ohno K, Motohashi M, Michi K-I. Histologic
and microradiologic comparison of block and particulate
cancellous bone and marrow grafts in reconstructed
mandibles being considered for dental implant placement.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54: 15–20.
- 10. Jones RHB. Orthognathic surgery and implants. Ann R
Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2002;16: 105–108.
- 11. Li KK, Stephens WL, Gliklich R. Reconstruction of the
severely atrophic edentulous maxilla using Le Fort I
osteotomy with simultaneous bone graft and implant
placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54: 542–546.
Le Fort I Osteotomy with Iliac Bone Grafts and Delayed Oral Implants for the Rehabilitation of Extremely Atrophied Maxilla
Yıl 2022,
Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 18 - 20, 30.12.2022
Alparslan Esen
,
Gökhan Gürses
Öz
In this case report, the rehabilitation of a severely resorbed edentulous maxilla with Le Fort I osteotomy combined with interpositional
autogenous bone grafts was presented. A 46-year-old woman applied to our clinic for the rehabilitation of edentulous
maxilla and mandible. Her systemic history revealed diabetes type 1. It was seen that the maxilla was severe atrophic and interocclusal
distance was increased due to excessive bone loss both vertically and horizontally. The patient was planned to undergo
iliac bone graft with Le Fort 1 osteotomy. The maxilla was positioned 6 mm forward and 3 mm down. First, interposition grafting
was performed in combination with Le Fort I surgery. Implants were placed after 4 months. Le Fort I osteotomy combined with
inter-positional autogenous bone grafts gives successful results in the edentulous patient who has excessive resorption pattern
with Class-III occlusal relationships and increased inter-occlusal distance.
Kaynakça
- 1. Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous
jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17: 232–236.
- 2. Chiapasco M1, Brusati R, Ronchi P. Le Fort I osteotomy
with interpositional bone grafts and delayed oral implants
for the rehabilitation of extremely atrophied maxillae:
a 1-9-year clinical follow-up study on humans. Clin Oral
Implants Res. 2007 Feb;18(1):74-85.
- 3. Isaksson S, Ekfeldt A, Alberius P, Blomqvist JE. Early
results from reconstruction of severely atrophic (Class
VI) maxillas by immediate endosseous implants in
conjunction with bone grafting and Le Fort I osteotomy. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;22: 144–148.
- 4. Cawood JI, Stoelinga PJW, Brouns JJA. Reconstruction
of the severely resorbed (Class VI) maxilla. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 1994;23: 219–225.
- 5. Kahnberg KE, Nilsson P, Rasmusson L. Le Fort I
osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts and implants
for rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla: a
2-stage procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:
571–578.
- 6. Precious DS, Morrison A, Richard D. Pterygomaxillary
separation without the use of osteotome. J Oral Maxillofac
Surg 1991;49:98 –9.
- 7. Jensen OT, Leopardi A, Gallegos L. The case for bone graft
reconstruction including sinus grafting and distraction
osteogenesis for the atrophic edentulous maxilla. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62: 1423–1428.
- 8. Ferri J, Dujoncquoy J-P, Carneiro JM, Raoul G. Maxillary
reconstruction to enable implant insertion: a retrospective
study of 181 patients. Head Face Med. 2008;4: 31.
- 9. Shirota T, Ohno K, Motohashi M, Michi K-I. Histologic
and microradiologic comparison of block and particulate
cancellous bone and marrow grafts in reconstructed
mandibles being considered for dental implant placement.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54: 15–20.
- 10. Jones RHB. Orthognathic surgery and implants. Ann R
Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2002;16: 105–108.
- 11. Li KK, Stephens WL, Gliklich R. Reconstruction of the
severely atrophic edentulous maxilla using Le Fort I
osteotomy with simultaneous bone graft and implant
placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54: 542–546.