DOĞAL DOĞUMA DÖNÜŞ: EBELER BUNA HAZIR MI? TÜRKİYE'NİN BATISINDAN KESİTSEL BİR ÇALIŞMA

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 31 - 50, 30.12.2023

Nevin Akdolun Balkaya , Keziban Amanak , Hale Uyar Hazar

https://doi.org/10.17339/ejovoc.1392416

Öz

This study aimed to report current knowledge and opinions of midwives regarding natural birth. Cross-sectional data were collected from 213 midwives. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. Midwives’ mean age and work experience were 37.85±5.81 and 18.36±6.49 years, respectively. Midwives assisted in normal births (65.3%), C-sections (33.3%) and natural births (1.6%), and indicated that the C-section is the riskiest birth (72.3%). Only 35% of midwives had received childbirth preparation classes training. Many midwives did not know about natural birth at all (21.2%) or about preparations for natural birth (41.7%). The midwives supported normal and natural births and believed such births to be healthy, but were not knowledgeable regarding natural birth and preparations for natural birth, and continued conventional birth practices.

P.S. Bu çalışma 21-23 Eylül 2012’de Çeşme’de düzenlenen I. Doğuma Hazırlık Eğitimi ve Eğitimciliği Kongresi’nde sözel bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ebe, Doğal Doğum, Bilgi, Düşünce

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma 21-23 Eylül 2012’de Çeşme’de düzenlenen I. Doğuma Hazırlık Eğitimi ve Eğitimciliği Kongresi’nde sözel bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma 21-23 Eylül 2012’de Çeşme’de düzenlenen I. Doğuma Hazırlık Eğitimi ve Eğitimciliği Kongresi’nde sözel bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.

RETURN TO NATURAL CHILDBIRTH: ARE OUR MIDWIVES READY FOR THIS? A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY FROM WESTERN TURKEY

Öz

This study aimed to report current knowledge and opinions of midwives regarding natural birth. Cross-sectional data were collected from 213 midwives. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. Midwives’ mean age and work experience were 37.85±5.81 and 18.36±6.49 years, respectively. Midwives assisted in normal births (65.3%), C-sections (33.3%) and natural births (1.6%), and indicated that the C-section is the riskiest birth (72.3%). Only 35% of midwives had received childbirth preparation classes training. Many midwives did not know about natural birth at all (21.2%) or about preparations for natural birth (41.7%). The midwives supported normal and natural births and believed such births to be healthy, but were not knowledgeable regarding natural birth and preparations for natural birth, and continued conventional birth practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Midwifes, Natural Childbirth, Knowledge, Opinion

Kaynakça

• ACOG (2019a). Approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth. ACOG Committee Opinion No: 766. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(2): e164-e173.
• ACOG. Cesarean delivery on maternal request (2019b). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761:. Obstet Gynecol, 133: 73-77.
• Akadlı Ergöçmen B, Çavlin A, Abbasoğlu Özgören A (2014). Üreme sağlığı. In: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü, Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması (2013). T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı ve TÜBİTAK, Ankara, Türkiye, Pp. 141-156 (in Turkish).
• Akyıldız D, Çoban A, Gör Uslu F, Taşpınar A (2021). Effects of Obstetric Interventions During Labor on Birth Process and Newborn Health. Florence Nightingale J Nurs, Feb 1;29(1):9-21. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2021.19093.
• Amanak K, Akdolun Balkaya N (2013). Ebelik bölümü öğrencilerinin doğal doğuma yönelik bilgi ve düşünceleri. Gümüşhane Ünv Sag Bil Derg, 2: 169-192 (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Antoniou E, Orovou E, Iliadou M, Sarella A, Palaska E, Sarantaki A, Iatrakis G, Dagla M (2022). Factors Associated with the Type of Cesarean Section and the Risk of Postoperative Complications in Greek Women. Journal of Women’s Health and Development 5: 081-096.
• Bagheri A, Simbar M, Samimi M, Nahidi F, Alavimajd H, Sadat Z (2021). Comparing the Implications of Midwifery-Led Care and Standard Model on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes during Pregnancy, Childbirth and Postpartum. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 9(3): 2863-2872. DOI: 10.22038/jmrh.2021.55639.1678
• Barol Kurtoğlu Z, Kaya N (2019). Doğumda defansif tıp uygulamalarının hasta hakları ve ebelik etik kodları yönünden değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Health Science and Profession, 6(3): 610-20.
• Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP (2008). Evidence-based labor and delivery management. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 199: 445-454.
• Camlibel M, Mete S (2020). Women’s Thoughts about Education Class for Awareness of Labor: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 13(1): 738-745.
• Caudwell-Hall J, Atan IK, Rojas RG et al (2018). Atraumatic normal vaginal delivery: how many women get what they want? YMOB, 219(4): 377.e1–377.e8
• CIMS (2015). The mother-friendly childbirth initiative Consensus initiative from the coalition for improwing maternity services. https://cims.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/CIMS'%20Mother-Friendly%20Childbirth%20Initiative%20(2015).pdf (accessed on January 30, 2023).
• Darra S (2009). ‘Normal’, ‘natural’, ‘good’ or ‘goodenough’ birth: examining the concepts. Nurs Inq, 16: 297-305.
• Dasikan S, Elmas S, Elmas C, Kiratlı D, Erdoğan M (2020). Routine Interventions During Normal Birth: Women’s Birth Experiences and Expectations. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 13(3): 1868-1867.
• Davis-Floyd, R (2022). The International Childbirth Initiative: An Applied Anthropologist’s Account of Developing Global Guidelines. In: Wallace, L.J., MacDonald, M.E., Storeng, K.T. (eds) Anthropologies of Global Maternal and Reproductive Health. Global Maternal and Child Health. Springer, Cham.
• Edmonds JK, Ivanof J, Kafulafula U (2020). Midwife Led Units: Transforming Maternity Care Globally. Ann Glob Health. Apr 28;86(1):44. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2794.
• Ely S, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2020).'Normal birth': Time to change our tune? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 60(5):810-812.
• Erbaydar N (2021). Mother-friendly hospital programme of Turkey: national intervention to improve the quality of maternity services. EMHJ, 27(2): 202-210.
• Fabbri D, Monfardini C, Castaldini I, Protonotari A (2016). Cesarean section and the manipulation of exact delivery time. Health Policy, 120: 780–789.
• Fiszer, E., Weiniger, C.F (2023). To Eat or Not to Eat? A Review of Current Practices Regarding Food in Labor. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-023-00549-1
• Goer H, Sagady, Leslie M, Romano A (2007). Does not routinely employ practices, procedures unsupported by scientific evidence: The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services. J Perinat Educ, 16: 32S-64S.
• Güleç Şatir D, Ünsal Atan Ş, Taner A, Gün S (2018). Kadın doğum kliniklerinde çalışan hemşire ve ebelerin doğal doğum ve doğumda uygulanan müdahalelere ilişkin bilgi ve görüşlerinin belirlenmesi. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştirma Dergisi, 15 (4): 222-227.
• Guzewicz, P.; Sierakowska, M (2022). The Role of Midwives in the Course of Natural Childbirth— Analysis of Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Factors—A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19, 15824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph192315824
• Hildingsson I, Karlström A, Rubertsson C, Larsson B (2021). Quality of intrapartum care assessed by women participating in a midwifery model of continuity of care. Eur J Midwifery. 23;5:11. doi: 10.18332/ejm/134502.
• Hua J, Zhu L, Du L, Li Y, Wu Z, Wo D, Du W (2018). Effects of midwife-led maternity services on postpartum wellbeing and clinical outcomes in primiparous women under China's one-child policy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, Aug 13;18(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1969-9.
• ICM (2014a). Position Statement The Midwife is the First Choice Health Professional for Childbearing Women. https://internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/statement-files/2018/04/the-midwife-is-the-first-choice-eng.pdf
• ICM (2014b). The philosophy and model of midwifery care. Available at https://internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2020/07/cd0005_v201406_en_philosophy-and-model-of-midwifery-care.pdf (accessed on January 31 2022).
• ICM (2014c). Position Statement: Keeping Birth Normal. https://internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/statement-files/2018/04/keeping-birth-normal-eng.pdf
• ICM (2017). Position Statement: Appropriate use of intervention in childbirth. https://internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/statement-files/2018/04/eng-appropriate-intervention.pdf.pdf
• ICM (2019). Essential competencies for midwifery practice. . https://internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2019/10/icm-competencies-en-print-october-2019_final_18-oct-5db05248843e8.pdf (accessed on January 31 2022).
• ICM (2021). Position Statement: Midwife-led Continuity of Care (MLCC). https://internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/statement-files/2021/09/ps2021_en_midwife-led-continuity-of-care-mlcc.pdf
• International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, International Confederation of Midwives, White Ribbon Alliance, International Pediatric Association, World Health Organization (2015). Mother−baby friendly birthing facilities. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 128(2):95–9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.013
• Jiang XM, Chen QY, Guo SB, Jin LZ, Huang XX, Liu XW, Hong JX, Qu HB, Hu RF (2018). Effect of midwife-led care on birth outcomes of primiparas. Int J Nurs Pract, Dec;24(6):e12686. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12686.
• Karlström, A., Nystedt, A. & Hildingsson, I (2015). The meaning of a very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth , 15: 251
• Lalonde A, Herschderfer K, Pascali-Bonaro D, Hanson C, Fuchtner C, Visser GHA (2019). The International Childbirth Initiative: 12 steps to safe and respectful Mother Baby-Family maternity care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, Jul;146(1):65-73.
• Lalonde AB, Herschderfer K, Miller S (2021). FIGO collaboration for safe and respectful maternity care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, Mar;152(3):285-287. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13310. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
• Lamaze International (2007). Position paper: Promoting, supporting, and protecting normal birth. J Perinat Educ. 16: 11–15.
• Lauzon L, Hodnett E (2001). Labour assessment programs to delay admission to labour wards. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3: CD000936.
• Liu, Y., Li, T., Guo, N. et al (2021). Women’s experience and satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care: a cross-sectional survey in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03638-3
• Logsdon K, Smith-Morris C (2017). An ethnography on perceptions of pain in Dutch "Natural" childbirth. Midwifery, Dec;55:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep
• Lothian JA (2007). Introduction: The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services. J Perinat Educ , 16: 1S-4S.
• Masoumi SZ, Kazemi F, Oshvandi K, Jalali M, Esmaeili-Vardanjani A, Rafiei H (2016). Effect of Training Preparation for Childbirth on Fear of Normal Vaginal Delivery and Choosing the Type of Delivery Among Pregnant Women in Hamadan, Iran: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Family Reprod Health, Sep;10(3):115-12.
• Mousavi SR, Amiri-Farahani L, Haghani S, Pezaro S (2022). Comparing the effect of childbirth preparation courses delivered both in-person and via social media on pregnancy experience, fear of childbirth, birth preference and mode of birth in pregnant Iranian women: A quasi-experimental study. PLoS ONE, 17(8): e0272613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272613
• Nilsson C, Bondas T, Lundgren I (2010). Previous birth experience in women with intense fear of childbirth. JOGNN, 39:298-309.
• Nilsson C, Olafsdottir OA, Lundgren I, Berg M, Dellenborg L (2019). Midwives' care on a labour ward prior to the introduction of a midwifery model of care: a field of tension. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. Dec;14(1):1593037. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1593037.
• OECD Health Statistics (2019). StatLink https://doi.org/10.1787/888934017918
• Olgaç Z, Karaçam Z (2017). Doğum ve kadın hastalıkları alanında çalışan hemşire, ebe ve hekimlerin anne-dostu doğum uygulamalarına ilişkin görüşleri. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi, 25(3):153-65.
• Onchonga D, Várnagy Á, Keraka M, Wainaina P (2020). Midwife-led integrated pre-birth training and its impact on the fear of childbirth. A qualitative interview study. Sex Reprod Healthc. Oct;25:100512. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100512.
• Pinar G, Avsar F, Aslantekin F (2018). Evaluation of the Impact of Childbirth Education Classes in Turkey on Adaptation to Pregnancy Process, Concerns About Birth, Rate of Vaginal Birth, and Adaptation to Maternity: A Case-Control Study. Clin Nurs Res, Mar;27(3):315-342. doi: 10.1177/1054773816682331. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
• Preis, H., Benyamini, Y., Eberhard-Gran, M. et al. (2018). Childbirth preferences and related fears - comparison between Norway and Israel. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 18, 362 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1997-5
• Queensland Clinical Guidelines (2017). Normal birth. Maternity and Neonatal Clinical Guideline. RBWH Post Office, Herston Qld 4029. Document number MN 17.25-V3-R22
• Sak S, Yıldırım Baş F, Gürdal O (2022).Evaluation of pregnancy information classes trainings on birth fear and birth method selection. J Educ Res Nurs. 19(1):93-97.
• Stark MA, Remynse M, Zwelling E.J (2016). Importance of the Birth Environment to Support Physiologic Birth. Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, Mar-Apr;45(2):285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2015.12.008.
• Suwanrath, C., Chunuan, S., Matemanosak, P. et al (2021). Why do pregnant women prefer cesarean birth? A qualitative study in a tertiary care center in Southern Thailand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 21: 23.
• T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı (2017). Sağlık istatistikleri yıllığı haber bülteni. Erişim tarihi: 06.04.2018, https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,30485/saglikistatistikleri-yilligi-2016-yayinlanmistir.html
• T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı (2022). Sezaryen klinik protokolü. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Araştırma, Geliştirme ve Sağlık Teknolojisi Değerlendirme Dairesi Başkanlığı Araştırma, Geliştirme ve Sağlık Teknolojisi Değerlendirme Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara. 1-98.
• WHO (2018). WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization, Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO