Foreign Bodies in the Nasal Cavity: A Single Center Experience

Year 2021, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 12 - 15, 01.04.2021

Mustafa Altıntaş

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the age groups at risk of nasal cavity foreign bodies, investigate the types of materials that might pose a danger and the measures that can be taken to avoid them, as well as to evaluate these measures in the light of the literature.

Material and Methods: The files of patients diagnosed with foreign body in the nose who were admitted to the Emergency Service or Ear-Nose-Throat Clinic in our hospital between January and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Various parameters such as the variety and frequency of foreign bodies, the nostril in which they were placed, the foreign body observed as per the age group, and gender were recorded. Patients who were admitted and completed their treatment in the pediatric clinic were excluded from the study. Clinical symptoms and treatment
protocols were investigated and these cases were discussed in the light of the literature.

Results: A total of 120 patients applied to our hospital during the study period. Seventy-nine of them (65.8%) were male and 41 (34.2%) were female patients. The average age was 4.25 years (13 months to 74 years). Endoscopic nasal examination was performed in the outpatient clinic. Foreign bodies were removed from the right nasal passage in 70 (58.3%), left nasal passage in 47 (39.2%), and both nasal passages in three (2.5%) cases. Treatment of 113 patients (94.2%) was successfully completed in the outpatient clinic. In the remaining seven patients (5.8%), foreign bodies were removed under sedation in the operating room. Five of the patients who underwent sedation were children and two were adult patients. Smelly rhinolith fragments could be removed from adult patients by breaking them. The limestone plaques formed around it caused bleeding. After the procedure, merocele tampon was placed. Most of the patients were between 0–5 years old in the pre-school group (n=94, 78.3%). This was followed by the school age group of children aged 6-15 years (n=17, 14.2%). The lowest proportion was the group consisting of adults aged 16 years and above (n=9, 7.5). The most common foreign bodies were small pieces of plastic toys (n=37, 30.8%). The most common age group in which the plastic toy parts were encountered was the 0–5 years age group (n=29, 78.4%). The second most common foreign bodies (n=23, 19.2%) were granular foods such as roasted chickpeas, hazelnuts, corn, and pomegranate seeds. The most common age group in which the granular foods were encountered was the pre-school age group with children aged 0–5 years (n=19, 82.6%).

Conclusion: The presence of foreign bodies in the nasal cavity is a common problem in otolaryngology, especially in the pediatric age group. It can cause serious side effects such as aspiration and obstruction; therefore, immediate intervention is required. Parents should be informed about this issue. Warning notices should be written especially on plastic toys that they may be dangerous for younger age groups.

Keywords

Foreign Body , nasal cavity , toy

References

• Botma M, Bader R, Kubba H. 'A parent's kiss': Evaluating an unusual method for removing na-sal foreign bodies in children. The Journal of laryngology and otology 2000; 114: 598-600.
• Chiun KC, Tang IP, Tan TY, Jong DE. Review of ear, nose and throat foreign bodies in Sarawak General Hospital. A five year experience. The Medical journal of Malaysia 2012; 67: 17-20
• Sharif S, Roberts G, Phillips J. Transnasal penetrating brain injury with a ballpen. Br J Neuro-surg 2000; 14: 159-160.
• Kadish HA, Corneli HM. Removal of nasal foreign bodies in the pediatric population. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 1997; 15: 54-6.
• Roland N, McRae R, Mccombe A. Key Topics in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers; 2005
• Kalan A, Tariq M. Foreign bodies in the nasal cavities: A comprehensive review of the aetio-logy, diagnostic pointers, and therapeutic measures. Postgrad Med J 2000; 76: 484-87
• Baluyot S Foreign bodies in the nasal cavity. In: Paparella M, Shumrick D (eds) Otolarygngology Vol 3. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders PA; 1980; pp 2009-16.
• Endican S, Garap JP, Dubey SP. Ear, nose and throat foreign bodies in Melanesian children: An analysis of 1037 cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 1539-45.
• Figueiredo RR, Azevedo AA, Kós AO, Tomita S. Nasal foreign bodies: Description of types and complications in 420 cases. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 72: 18-23.
• Chan TC, Ufberg J, Harrigan RA, Vilke GM. Nasal foreign body removal. J Emerg Med 2004; 26: 441-45.
• Balbani AP, Sanchez TG, Butugan O, et al. Ear and nose foreign body removal in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 46: 37-42.
• Kiger JR, Brenkert TE, Losek JD. Nasal foreign body removal in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008; 24: 785-92.
• Backlin SA. Positive-pressure technique for nasal foreign body removal in children. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25: 554-5.
• Mukherjee A, Haldar D, Dutta S, Dutta M, Saha J, Sinha R. Ear, nose and throat foreign bodies in children: a search for socio-demographic correlates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 75: 510-2.
• Ogunleye AO, Sogebi OA. Nasal foreign bodies in the African children. Afr J Med Med Sci 2004; 33: 225-8
• Tong MC, Ying SY, van Hasselt CA. Nasal foreign bodies in children. Int J Pediatr Otor-hinolaryngol 1996; 35: 207-11.
• Memis M, Ilhan E, Ulucanli S, Yaman H, Guclu E. [Nasal foreign bodies: an analysis of 130 pa-tients]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2015; 25: 109-12.
• Ozdemir S, Akbas Y, Görgülü O, Selçuk T, Sayar C. Rhinolithiasis: Review of 21 cases. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010; 24:136-39.