Research Article

A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty

Volume: 9 Number: 2 August 5, 2026

A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty

Abstract

Objective: To compare the performance of a novel piezoelectric tip with that of a conventional tip for dorsal hump resection in primary open septorhinoplasty, with the hypothesis that the new design would shorten resection time without increasing postoperative edema, ecchymosis, or compromising aesthetic satisfaction. Method: In this randomized clinical trial, adults aged 18–50 years undergoing primary open septorhinoplasty were allocated 1:1 to dorsal hump resection with either a novel piezoelectric tip or a conventional tip. Fifty patients meeting the eligibility criteria were included (25 per group). The primary outcome was hump resection time. Secondary outcomes were periorbital edema and ecchymosis at postoperative day 2, graded using the Kara–Gökalan scale, and patient- and physician-rated nasal shape satisfaction at 1 year using a visual analog scale. Results: The groups were comparable in age and sex distribution. Mean hump resection time was significantly shorter in the novel-tip group than in the conventional-tip group (4.73 ± 0.88 vs 5.79 ± 0.98 minutes, p < 0.001), representing an approximately 18% reduction. Early postoperative edema and ecchymosis scores did not differ significantly between groups. Likewise, patient- and physician-rated nasal shape satisfaction at 1 year were similar. Multivariable analysis confirmed that tip type was not associated with satisfaction outcomes. Conclusion: The novel piezoelectric tip significantly improved procedural efficiency during hump resection without worsening early soft-tissue morbidity or long-term aesthetic satisfaction. These findings support its safe and practical use in primary open septorhinoplasty.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Taşkın Ü, Batmaz T, Erdil M, Aydın S, Yücebaş K. The comparison of edema and ecchymosis after piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2017;274(2):861-865.
  2. 2. Mirza AA, Alandejani TA, Al-Sayed AA. Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Laryngoscope. 2020;130(5):1158-1165.
  3. 3. Khajuria A, Krzak AM, Reddy RK, Lai K, Wignakumar T, Rohrich RJ. Piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery–Global Open. 2022;10(11):e4673.
  4. 4. Robiony M, Toro C, Costa F, Sembronio S, Polini F, Politi M. Piezosurgery: a new method for osteotomies in rhinoplasty. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2007;18(5):1098-1100.
  5. 5. Kara CO, Gökalan I. Effects of single-dose steroid usage on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1999;104(7):2213-2218.
  6. 6. Wähmann M, Riedel F, Kovacevic M, Hopf A, Albers A. Comparison of piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Hno. 2019;67(2):98-109.
  7. 7. Safia A, Abd Elhadi U, Farhat R, et al. Is Piezosurgery Associated with Improved Patient Outcomes Compared to Conventional Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(13):3635.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Otorhinolaryngology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 5, 2026

Submission Date

March 17, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 11, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 2

APA
Karatan, B., Uzun, T., Uzunoğlu, E., & Müderris, T. (2026). A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 9(2), 76-79. https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1911128
AMA
1.Karatan B, Uzun T, Uzunoğlu E, Müderris T. A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2026;9(2):76-79. doi:10.65396/ejra.1911128
Chicago
Karatan, Berrak, Tankut Uzun, Eray Uzunoğlu, and Togay Müderris. 2026. “A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 9 (2): 76-79. https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1911128.
EndNote
Karatan B, Uzun T, Uzunoğlu E, Müderris T (August 1, 2026) A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 9 2 76–79.
IEEE
[1]B. Karatan, T. Uzun, E. Uzunoğlu, and T. Müderris, “A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty”, Eur J Rhinol Allergy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 76–79, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.65396/ejra.1911128.
ISNAD
Karatan, Berrak - Uzun, Tankut - Uzunoğlu, Eray - Müderris, Togay. “A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 9/2 (August 1, 2026): 76-79. https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1911128.
JAMA
1.Karatan B, Uzun T, Uzunoğlu E, Müderris T. A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2026;9:76–79.
MLA
Karatan, Berrak, et al. “A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, vol. 9, no. 2, Aug. 2026, pp. 76-79, doi:10.65396/ejra.1911128.
Vancouver
1.Berrak Karatan, Tankut Uzun, Eray Uzunoğlu, Togay Müderris. A Novel Piezoelectric Tip for Dorsal Hump Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Open Septorhinoplasty. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2026 Aug. 1;9(2):76-9. doi:10.65396/ejra.1911128

You can find the current version of the Instructions to Authors at: https://www.eurjrhinol.org/en/instructions-to-authors-104

Starting on 2020, all content published in the journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 International
License which allows third parties to use the content for non-commercial purposes as long as they give credit to the original work. This license
allows for the content to be shared and adapted for non-commercial purposes, promoting the dissemination and use of the research published in
the journal.
The content published before 2020 was licensed under a traditional copyright, but the archive is still available for free access.