Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction

Gürcan Sünnetçi; Ahmet Altuntaş; Mesut Yeşilova

doi:10.65396/ejra.1965316

Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction

Abstract

Objective Surgeons can now manage the projection, rotation, stability, and long-term aesthetic results of the nose using extension grafts, which are crucial components of structural rhinoplasty. Several extension graft methods have been published, but there is a lack of comparable clinical evidence. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the three different extension graft methods, namely Classic Septal Extension Graft (SEG), Full-Transfixion Septal Extension Graft (FT-SEG), and Extended Spreader Extension Graft (ESEG), in terms of their effectiveness and aesthetic results. Methods Roughly 90 individuals who underwent rhinoplasty between 2022 and 2025 comprised the study's retrospective comparison cohort. Each of the three groups of patients (n=30 per group) was randomly assigned to a different extension graft technique. The Integrated Nasal Tip Aesthetic Score (INTAS), nasolabial angle, and tip projection ratio were the main outcome measures. Evaluation of Nasal Obstruction Symptoms (NOSE), Rhinoplasty Outcome (ROE), patient satisfaction, complications, and revision rates were included as secondary outcomes. There was a comparison of pre- and post-operative results across groups. Results All three methods markedly enhanced nostril tip rotation, projection, functional results, and patient satisfaction. The FT-SEG group had significantly higher final INTAS scores (51.6 ± 2.3) compared with the SEG (47.8 ± 2.6) and ESEG (46.3 ± 2.9) groups (p < 0.001). The group that received FT-SEG had the highest level of patient satisfaction (9.4 ± 0.4; p < 0.001). All groups showed functional improvement as measured by NOSE scores; the SEG and FT-SEG groups had lower NOSE ratings. There was little variation in the rates of complications and revisions across the groups. Conclusion The cosmetic and functional results of any extension graft method were satisfactory. Patient satisfaction was higher, and objective aesthetic performance was better with the Full-Transfixion Septal Extension Graft, despite similar functional outcomes. These results provide further evidence that FT-SEG may improve the long-term control of tip projection and rotation in structural rhinoplasty.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

N/A

Ethical Statement

Ethics Committee Approval: This study strictly followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from Toros University ethics committee (meeting date: May 2026).

References

1. Espinosa J, Ochoa JD, García RFFP. Enhancing Nasal Tip Control: The Role of Septum Anchorage Sutures in Modern Rhinoplasty. Facial Plastic Surgery. Published online December 19, 2025. doi:10.1055/a-2773-5517
2. Schertzer J, Farrior EH, Toman J. Tip Tensioning in Rhinoplasty. Facial Plastic Surgery. Published online December 5, 2025. doi:10.1055/a-2764-3583
3. Glass GE, Badia L, East C. Next-generation Septal Contouring in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: A Structural Viewpoint. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2022;10(2). doi:10.1097/gox. 0000000000004042
4. Lee N, Winkler AA. Structural Nasal Tip Grafting: Anatomy, Evaluation, and Technique Selection for Durable Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes. Facial Plastic Surgery. Published online December 5, 2025. doi:10.1055/a-2764-3269
5. Mookerjee VG, Shah J, Carney MJ, Alper DP, Steinbacher DM. Long-term Control of Nasal Tip Position: Quantitative Assessment of Caudal Septal Extension Graft. Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum. 2023;5. doi:10.1093/asjof/ojad027.006
6. Rohrich RJ, Durand P, Dayan E. Changing Role of Septal Extension versus Columellar Grafts in Modern Rhinoplasty. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2020;145(5). doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000006730
7. Özdemir E., Bayar Muluk N., Arslanoğlu A., Sünnetçi G., Bal C., Yazır M., Barışkan S., Topan Y. E., Kaya F., Değirmenci A., Altuntaş A., Yeşilova M., Aynacı S., Cingi C. Validation and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Integrated Nasal Tip Aesthetic Score (INTAS): Kombine Burun Ucu Estetik Skoru (KOBUCES), Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, Airway and Facial Surgery 2026;1(1): 1-9
8. Giuli RD, Mafi P, Belloni L, Vaccari S, Klinger F, Roxo CW. Achieving a Strong and Straight Septal Extension Graft: A Novel Four-step Surgical Approach in Rhinoplasty. PubMed Central. 2024;12(10). doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000006272

9. Ortíz R, Hamaguchi R, Bartlett RA, Austen WG. Optimizing Nasal Tip Position. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2025;95(4):350-355. doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000004489
10. Brandstetter M, Bhatt M, Pham M, Gubisch W, Haack S. Comparative Analysis and Long-Term Results of Various Septal Extension Graft Types. Facial Plast Surg. 2020;36(3):263-267. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1712468
11. Assiri H, Alhejaily M, Alfaleh M, Alarfaj A, AlNassar R, Alanzi O. Surgical Outcomes of Bilateral Technique of Septal Extension Graft in Septorhinoplasty: A Single-center Experience. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2025;13(5). doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000006780
12. Yazir M, Muluk NB, Kaya F, et al. Rhinoplasty Grafts: Surgical Utility Versus Patient-Perceived Aesthetic Impact. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. Published online March 18, 2026. doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000012583
13. Jeon YJ, Lee TH, Joo YH, Kim S. Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of Combined Use of Extended Spreader Graft and Septal Extension Graft. Life. 2025;15(4):546-546. doi:10.3390/life15040546
14. Resuli AS, Dilber M, Bayar Muluk N, Cingi C. Septal extension graft use in the treatment of alar collapse. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(2 Suppl):8-13. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202303_31695
15. Cingi C, Bayar Muluk N, Winkler A, Thomas JR. Nasal Tip Grafts. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(7):1914-1921. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005044
16. rdenas JCC, Carvajal J, Ruiz Á. Securing Nasal Tip Rotation through Suspension Suture Technique. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2006;117(6):1750-1755. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000210029.58404.51
17. Dadacı M, Zuhour M, İnce B, ALTUNTAŞ Z. Internal mucosal resection and LLC suspension: a new method to establish a stable tip rotation angle and reduce the nasal bridge length. Turkish Journal Of Medical Sciences. 2024;54(2):431-440. doi:10.55730/1300-0144.5808
18. Kurt Y, Oğuz O, Bayar Muluk N, Cingi C. Caudal septal extension grafts: conchal cartilage or PDS foil-empowered nasal cartilage. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(5 Suppl):95-100. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202310_34077
19. Chun M, Kumar T, O’Connell S, Metzinger SE. Increasing Nasal Tip Projection Using Structural Grafts: A Review of Outcomes. Southern Medical Journal. 2022;115(10):765-772. doi:10.14423/smj.0000000000001458
20. Naguib MB, Ahmed M, Madian YT, Elnahriry TM, Eldeeb WE. Functional and aesthetic outcomes of spreader graft and auto-spreader flap after nasal hump removal. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology. 2020;36(1). doi:10.1186/s43163-020-00058-6
21. Kim MH, Choi J, Kim M, Kim SK, Lee KC. An Introduction to the Septal Extension Graft. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2014;41(1):29-34. doi:10.5999/aps.2014.41.1.29
22. Haavisto L, Sipilä J. Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and visual analogue scale before and after septal surgery: a prospective 10-year follow-up. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2012;38(1):23-29. doi:10.1111/coa.12043
23. Khajuria A, Rupra RS, Daneshi K, et al. A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rhinoplasty. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. Published online October 9, 2025. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000012513
24. Pawar S, Garcia GJM, Kimbell JS, Rhee JM. Objective Measures in Aesthetic and Functional Nasal Surgery: Perspectives on Nasal Form and Function. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2010;26(4):320-327. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1262314

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Otorhinolaryngology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Gürcan Sünnetçi ^*
Türkiye

Ahmet Altuntaş
Türkiye

Mesut Yeşilova
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 5, 2026

Submission Date

June 6, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 11, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1965316

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA94ZK24DT

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Sünnetçi, G., Altuntaş, A., & Yeşilova, M. (2026). Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 9(2), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1965316

AMA

1.Sünnetçi G, Altuntaş A, Yeşilova M. Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2026;9(2):80-86. doi:10.65396/ejra.1965316

Chicago

Sünnetçi, Gürcan, Ahmet Altuntaş, and Mesut Yeşilova. 2026. “Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 9 (2): 80-86. https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1965316.

EndNote

Sünnetçi G, Altuntaş A, Yeşilova M (August 1, 2026) Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 9 2 80–86.

IEEE

[1]G. Sünnetçi, A. Altuntaş, and M. Yeşilova, “Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction”, Eur J Rhinol Allergy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 80–86, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.65396/ejra.1965316.

ISNAD

Sünnetçi, Gürcan - Altuntaş, Ahmet - Yeşilova, Mesut. “Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 9/2 (August 1, 2026): 80-86. https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1965316.

JAMA

1.Sünnetçi G, Altuntaş A, Yeşilova M. Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2026;9:80–86.

MLA

Sünnetçi, Gürcan, et al. “Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction”. European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, vol. 9, no. 2, Aug. 2026, pp. 80-86, doi:10.65396/ejra.1965316.

Vancouver

1.Gürcan Sünnetçi, Ahmet Altuntaş, Mesut Yeşilova. Comparative Performance of Septal Extension Graft Techniques in Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Nasal Tip Rotation, Projection, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2026 Aug. 1;9(2):80-6. doi:10.65396/ejra.1965316