Effects of moisture conditions on winter wheat yield using the Palmer drought severity index: A case study of the Rostov region, Russia

Year 2026, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 24 - 34, 02.01.2026

Vasiliy Gudko Sudeep Tanwar , Tatiana Minkina , Svetlana Sushkova Alexander Usatov Kirill Azarin Tayfun Aşkın , Rıdvan Kızılkaya

https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.1819523

Abstract

The paper examines the effect of fluctuations in moisture conditions in different seasons on spatiotemporal changes in winter wheat yields in the Rostov region of Russia in 2010-2024. The Palmer drought severity index (PDSI) was used as a moisture indicator. In general, the yield value from the maximum values of 4.0–5.0 t/ha in the southern and western parts of the region decreases with removal to the northern and eastern parts to the minimum values of 2.0–3.0 t/ha. During the study period, most of the districts were characterized by a significant trend of increasing crop yields at an average rate of 0.14 t/ha per year. There were no spatial features in increasing yields. During this time interval, periods of increasing and stagnating crop yields were observed in the region, and these dynamics correlated with fluctuations in the PDSI index. The most significant influence on the yield of winter wheat in various regions of the region was exerted by the moisture conditions in the spring season. As a factor, this indicator explained, depending on the region, from 24.8% to 69.2% of the interannual variability in the yield of this crop. The influence of moisture conditions in the autumn and winter seasons was less pronounced. The most significant decrease in yields was observed in 2013, when moderate and severe droughts were observed in most of the region during the previous autumn, winter and spring seasons. Our experience has shown that PDSI is a fairly informative and reliable indicator that can be successfully used in analyzing the impact of moisture conditions on winter wheat yields.

Keywords

Moisture conditions , Drought , Winter wheat yield , PDSI , Rostov region

Supporting Institution

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russia

Project Number

075-15-2025-667

Thanks

The research was supported by the Strategic Academic Leadership Program of the Southern Federal University ("Priority 2030") and with the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russia (Agreement No. 075-15-2025-667) using the equipment of the Soil Bioengineering Center for Collective use.

References

• Alley, W.M., 1984. The Palmer drought severity index: limitations and assumptions. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 23(7): 1100–1109.
• Bonea, D., Urechean, V., 2020. Response of maize yield to variation in rainfall and average temperature in central part of Oltenia. Romanian Agricultural Research 37: 1–8.
• Coles, P.A., Egesdal, M., Ellen, I.G., Li, X., Sundararajan, A., 2017. Airbnb usage across New York city neighborhoods: Geographic patterns and regulatory implications. Cambridge Handbook on the Law of the Sharing (Forthcoming) Economy. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048397
• Dietz, K.J., Zörb C., Geilfus, C.M., 2021. Drought and crop yield. Plant Biology 23(6): 881–893.
• Gudko, V., Usatov, A., Denisenko, Y., Duplii, N., Azarin, K., 2022. Dependence of maize yield on hydrothermal factors in various agro-climatic zones of the Rostov region of Russia in the context of climate change. International Journal of Biometeorology 66(7), 1461–1472
• Gudko, V., Usatov, A., Ioshpa, A., Denisenko, Y., Shevtsova, V., Azarin, K., 2021b. Agro-climatic conditions of the Southern Federal District of Russia in the context of climate change. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 145(3): 989–1006.
• Gudko, V., Usatov, A., Minkina, T., Azarin, K., Tarigholizadeh, S., Sushkova, S., Kravchenko, E., 2024. Spatiotemporal shifts in humidification zones: assessing climate impact on bioclimatic landscapes. International Journal of Biometeorology 68(12): 2565–2578.
• Gudko, V.N., Usatov, A.V., Azarin, K.V., 2021a. Analysis of hydrothermal conditions in the Rostov region in the period 1960–2019. Arid Ecosystems 11(4): 337–342.
• Guttmann, G., 1992. Zur Psychophysiologie des Bewußtseins. In: Das Bewußtsein: Multidimensionale Entwürfe. Guttmann, G., Langer, G. (Eds.). Springer, Vienna. Volume 4, pp. 262–307.
• Kendall, MG., 1990. Rank correlation methods. 4th Edition. Charles Griffin, London.
• Kirilenko, A., Dronin, N., 2022. Recent grain production boom in Russia in historical context. Climatic Change 171: 22.
• Liu, Q., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Yao, F., Bai, Y., Zhang, S., Meng, X., Liu, Q., 2021. Evaluating the performance of eight drought indices for capturing soil moisture dynamics in various vegetation regions over China. Science of the Total Environment 789: 147803.
• Lukyanets, A.S., Bragin, A.S., 2021. The impact of climate risks on Russia’s economic development: Example of the North Caucasian Federal District. RUDN Journal of Economics 29(2): 439–450.
• Mameev, V.V., 2016. State of grain production of winter cereal crops in the Russian Federation and Bryansk region. Vestnik of Bryansk State University 1: 3–9.
• Mann, H.B., 1945. Nonparametric tests against Trend. Econometrica 13(3): 245-259.
• Mika, J., Horváth, S.Z., Makra, L., Dunkel, Z., 2005. The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) as an indicator of soil moisture. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 30(1-3): 223–230.
• Palmer, W.C., 1965. Meteorological drought. Office of Climatology Research Paper 45. Weather Bureau. Washington D.C. 58 pp.
• Samofalov, A.P., Podgorny, S.V., Skripka, O.V., Gromova, S.N., Chernova, V.L., 2023. Changes in yield and its structure elements of winter bread wheat depending on the conditions of a moisture supply and a genotype. Agrarian Science 7: 85–91 [in Russian].
• Shoba, S.A., Alyabina, I.O., Golozubov, O.M., Chekmaryov, P.A., Lukin, S.V., Chernova, O.V., Kolesnikova, V.M., 2023. Experience in creating an information system for the rational use of soil resources. Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin 78(4): 327–338.
• Szép, I.J., Mika, J., Dunkel, Z., 2005. Palmer drought severity index as soil moisture indicator: physical interpretation, statistical behaviour and relation to global climate. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 30(1–3): 231–243.
• Thornthwaite, C.W., 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review 38: 55–94.
• Tunalıoğlu, R., Durdu, Ö.F., 2012. Assessment of future olive crop yield by a comparative evaluation of drought indices: a case study in western Turkey. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 108(3): 397–410.
• Weber, L., Kkemdirim, L., 1998. Palmer's drought indices revisited. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography 80(2): 153–172.
• Wegren, S.K., 2011. Food security and Russia's 2010 drought. Eurasian Geography and Economics 52(1): 140–156.
• Wilhite, D.A., Glantz, M.H., 1985. Understanding: the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water international 10(3): 111–120.
• Yan, H., Wang, S.Q., Wang, J.B., Lu, H.Q., Guo, A.H., Zhu, Z.C., Myneni, R.B., Shugart, H.H., 2016. Assessing spatiotemporal variation of drought in China and its impact on agriculture during 1982–2011 by using PDSI indices and agriculture drought survey data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 121(5): 2283–2298.
• Zargar, A., Sadiq, R., Naser, B., Khan, F.I., 2011. A review of drought indices. Environmental Reviews 19: 333–349.