Effects of soil types and land use - land cover on soil organic carbon density at Madendere watershed

Abstract

Identifying the primary factors influencing watershed scale soil organic carbon (SOC) spatial distribution is critical for improving the accuracy of SOC stock estimates. The primary objective of the current study is to determine the effects of soil type and land use-land cover on SOC in Maden Dere Watershed. To determine land use and land cover of the study area, Geoeye satellite image was used. Four main land use and land cover that are forest, pasture, orchard and cultivated land were determined. Results indicate soil types and land use-land cover were two influencing factors of SOC density spatial variation. SOC density of soil profiles, Haplustept (37.58 kg/m²) was significantly higher than other soil great groups. Main reasons of this result are indicated as profile depth and pedological development. In addition, it was determined land use and land cover affect on SOC by taking soil samples. For surface soils SOC density, the lowest average carbon storage (5.05 kg/m²) was found in cultivated soils. In conclusion, it should be developed proper land use policy and sustainable soil management and cropping practices to combat the ongoing soil degradation and improve soil fertility in the study area.

Keywords

• Soil type, Land use-land cover, SOC density, Maden Dere Watershed

References

1. Blacke, G.R., Hartge, K.H. 1986. Bulk density. In Klute, A. (ed). Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9: pp.363-382.
2. Bauer, A., Black, A.L. 1994. Quantification of the effect of soil organic matter content on soils productivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58: 186-193.
3. Christensen, B.T., 2001. Physical fractionation of soil and structural and functional complexity in organic matter turnover. European Journal of Soil Science 52: 345-353.
4. Chiti, T., Gardin, L., Perugini, L., Quaratino, R., Vaccari, F.P., Miglietta, F., Valentini, R., 2011. Soil organic carbon stock assessment for the different cropland land uses in Italy. Biology and Fertility of Soils 48(1):9-17
5. Chaplot, V., Bouahom, B., Valentin, C., 2009. Soil organic carbon stocks in Laos: spatial variations and controlling factors. Global Change Biology 16(4)1380-1393
6. Fang, X., Xue, Z., Li, B., An, S., 2012. Soil organic carbon distribution in relation to land use and its storage in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 88(1): 6-13
7. Jaiarree, S, Chidthaisong, A, Tangtham, N., Polprasert, C., Sarobol, E., Tyler, S.C., 2011. Soil organic carbon loss and turnover resulting from forest conversion to maize fields in Eastern Thailand. Pedosphere. 21(5): 581-590.
8. Guggenberger, G., Zech, W., Thomas, R.J., 1995. Lignin and carbohydrate alteration in particle size separates of an Oxisol under tropical pastures following native savanna. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27: 1629–1638.

9. Gülser, C., Candemir, F., 2012. Changes in penetration resistance of a clay field with organic waste applications. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 1: 16-21.
10. Kussainova, M., Durmuş, M., Erkoçak, A., Kızılkaya, R., 2013. Soil dehydrogenase activity of natural macro aggregates in a toposequence of forest soil. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 2:69-75
11. McCarthy, J.F., Ilavsky, J., Jastrow, J.L., Mayer, L.M., Perfect, E., Zhuang, J., 2008. Protection of organic carbon in soil microaggregates via restructuring of aggregate porosity and filling of pores with accumulating organic matter. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72: 4725-4744.
12. Nelson, D.W., Sommers, L.E., 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page, L.A., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Methods (2 nd ed). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 539-579.
13. Noellemeyer, E., Frank, F., Alvarez, C., Morazzo, G., Quiroga, A., 2008. Carbon contents and aggregation related to soil physical and biological properties under a land-use sequence in the semiarid region of central Argentina. Soil and Tillage Research 99: 179-190.
14. Plante, A.F., McGill, W.B., 2002. Soil agregate dynamics and retention of organic matter in laboratory-incubated soil with differing simulated tillage frequencies. Soil and Tillage Research 66: 79-92.
15. Post, W.M.M., Kwon, K.C.C., 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential Global Change Biology 6: 317–27
16. Robinson, C.A., Cruse, R.M., Kohler, K.A. 1994. Soil management. In: Hatfield, J.L. and D.L. Karlen (Eds.), Sustainable Agricultural Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 109-134.
17. Sbih, M., Karam, A., N’Dayegamiye, A., Bensid, Z., Boukaboub, A., 2012. Dynamic of the active fraction of organiz matter in some meadow soils. . Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 1 : 22-27
18. Shang, C, Tiessen, H., 2003. Soil organic carbon sequestration and stabilization in karstic soils of Yucatan. Biogeochemistry 62:177–196.
19. Soil Taxonomy. 1999. A Basic of soil classification for making and interpreting soil survey. USDA Handbook No: 436, Washington D.C. USA (1999).
20. White II, D.A., Welty-Bernard, A., Rasmussen, C., Schwartz, E., 2009. Vegetation controls on soil organic carbon dynamics in an arid, hyperthermic ecosystem. Geoderma 150 (1-2): 214-223
21. Zhang, M., Zhang, X.K., Liang, W.J., Jianf, Y., Dai, G.H., Wang, X.G., Han, S.J., 2011. Distribution of soil organic carbon fractions along the altitudinal gradient in Changbai mountain, China. Pedosphere. 21(5): 615-620.