Öz
The present investigation was conducted to examine the extent of phenotypic and genotypic correlation in bi-parental mating
and selfing for yield and related components. Sixty plants from every cross of barley (IBON-W-61 x DWR91, BH935 x
BH902 and BH902/DWRUB64) were randomly selected and crossed as well as selfed to generate 30 BIPs and 30 selfed
progenies in 2012-13. In 2013-14 those slefed and intermated progenies were grown in a compact family block design with
three replications. Data were recorded on days to heading, days to maturity, plant height, spike length, grain/spike, effective
tiller number per plant, biomass yield per plant, grain yield per plant, harvest index and 1000-grain weight. The genotypic
and phenotypic correlation coefficients were calculated between pair of characters. From the study it was concluded that
intermating has improved mean performance and variance of characters by breaking linkages between genes and resulted
in breakage of coupling phase and repulsion phase linkages that led to decreased and increased correlations, respectively.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Intermating selfing biparental coupling phase repulsion phase.
Kaynakça
- Al-Tabbal JA and Al-Fraihat AH (2012). Genetic variation, heritability, phenotypic and genotypic correlation studies for yield and yield components in promising barley genotypes. J. Agri. Sci. 4 (3): 193-210.
- Amudha K, Arumugachamy S and Thiyagarajan K, (2006). Studies on selfed and biparental progenies involving upland rice genotypes. Crop Res. 31(1): 157-159.
- Anonymous (2012). Barley. Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research Centres (CGIAR). http://www.cgiar.org/our-research/ crop-factsheets/barley/. Accessed on 20/11/2013.
- Comstock RE and Robinson HF (1952). Estimation of average dominance of genes, pp. 494-515. In: Heterosis, Gowen, J.W. (Ed), Iowa State College Press-Ames.
- Falconer DS (1989). Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edition John Wiley, New York.
- Fredrickson LJ and Kronsrad WE (1985). A comparison of intermating and selfing following selection for heading date in two diverse w
- Guddadamath S, Mohankumar HD and Salimath PM (2011). Genetic analysis of segregating populations for yield in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 24 (2): 114-117.
- Guddadamath SG, Mohankumar HD and Salimath PM (2012). Effect of biparental mating on association pattern among quantitative characters in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]. Int. J. of Hort. 2(5): 21-24.
Öz
Kaynakça
- Al-Tabbal JA and Al-Fraihat AH (2012). Genetic variation, heritability, phenotypic and genotypic correlation studies for yield and yield components in promising barley genotypes. J. Agri. Sci. 4 (3): 193-210.
- Amudha K, Arumugachamy S and Thiyagarajan K, (2006). Studies on selfed and biparental progenies involving upland rice genotypes. Crop Res. 31(1): 157-159.
- Anonymous (2012). Barley. Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research Centres (CGIAR). http://www.cgiar.org/our-research/ crop-factsheets/barley/. Accessed on 20/11/2013.
- Comstock RE and Robinson HF (1952). Estimation of average dominance of genes, pp. 494-515. In: Heterosis, Gowen, J.W. (Ed), Iowa State College Press-Ames.
- Falconer DS (1989). Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edition John Wiley, New York.
- Fredrickson LJ and Kronsrad WE (1985). A comparison of intermating and selfing following selection for heading date in two diverse w
- Guddadamath S, Mohankumar HD and Salimath PM (2011). Genetic analysis of segregating populations for yield in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 24 (2): 114-117.
- Guddadamath SG, Mohankumar HD and Salimath PM (2012). Effect of biparental mating on association pattern among quantitative characters in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]. Int. J. of Hort. 2(5): 21-24.
Ayrıntılar
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
|---|---|
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Ocak 2017 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2017 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 |